AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Core i9-14901KE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database shows a striking asymmetry in available benchmark data between these two processors. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a complete suite of 17 recorded measurements across Cinebench and Passmark tests, while the Intel Core i9-14901KE currently has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This makes a direct numerical head-to-head comparison impossible based on the recorded data alone. What the data does show is where the Ryzen 5 7533HS positions itself within the broader processor landscape, and what its individual scores indicate about its performance profile.

The Ryzen 5 7533HS delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12342 and a single-core score of 1742. In Passmark testing, it records an integer math score of 50800, a floating point math score of 27800, and a multithread score of 14520. Its single-thread Passmark score sits at 2740. The data also shows a data compression score of 168692, a data encryption score of 10718, and an extended instructions score of 11219. Prime number finding yields a score of 48, while physics testing produces 821. Random string sorting records 17669.

Because the Intel Core i9-14901KE has no benchmark entries in the database, the head-to-head section must rely on what the recorded data can tell us about the Ryzen's standing. The Ryzen 5 7533HS holds a 73rd percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 19364. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V with an average score of 19368 (a 0% delta), the Intel Core i5-1345U with 19411 (-0.2% delta), the Intel Core i7-8700K with 19238 (+0.7% delta), and the Intel Core i7-10700F with 19499 (-0.7% delta). This places the Ryzen in a tightly contested performance band where a few points in either direction separate it from its closest competitors.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two processors is substantial. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the Rembrandt-R codename, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i9-14901KE uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-R codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The die sizes reflect this process difference: the AMD chip measures 208 mm², while the Intel chip comes in at 257 mm².

Core and thread counts differ as well. The Ryzen 5 7533HS offers 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Core i9-14901KE provides 8 cores and 16 threads. Clock speeds show the Intel part with a higher base clock of 3.80 GHz versus 3.30 GHz on the AMD, and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz versus 4.40 GHz. The thermal design power figures are starkly different: the Ryzen is rated at 35 W, while the Core i9 draws 125 W.

Cache configurations also diverge significantly. The AMD processor provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB L3 cache. The Intel processor offers 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. The Intel part's larger per-core L2 allocation and more than double the L3 capacity suggest a design aimed at higher sustained throughput.

Memory support shows another split. The Ryzen 5 7533HS supports DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration with a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Core i9-14901KE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, though the database does not record a memory bandwidth figure for it. ECC memory support is absent on the AMD part but present on the Intel part. PCIe capabilities differ as well: the Ryzen provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the Core i9 provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Integrated graphics differ between the two. The Ryzen 5 7533HS uses a Radeon 660M, while the Core i9-14901KE uses UHD Graphics 770. The market segments also diverge: the Ryzen is classified as a mobile processor on AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel part is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700. The multiplier is unlocked on the Intel chip but locked on the AMD chip. Release dates place the Intel part first at June 30, 2024, with the AMD following on August 31, 2024.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901KE has a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a boost clock of 4.40 GHz.

Q: How do the core counts compare?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901KE provides 8 cores and 16 threads, whereas the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS provides 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What process nodes are used for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Core i9-14901KE uses a 10 nm process at Intel.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901KE supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS does not.

Q: What is the thermal design power difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a TDP of 35 W, while the Intel Core i9-14901KE has a TDP of 125 W.

Q: Does the database contain benchmark scores for the Intel Core i9-14901KE?

A: No. The database records benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS across 17 tests, but the Intel Core i9-14901KE currently has no benchmark entries.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification field in the database.

• Cores: 6 (AMD) vs 8 (Intel)
• Threads: 12 (AMD) vs 16 (Intel)
• Base Clock: 3.30 GHz (AMD) vs 3.80 GHz (Intel)
• Boost Clock: 4.40 GHz (AMD) vs 5.80 GHz (Intel)
• TDP: 35 W (AMD) vs 125 W (Intel)
• Socket: AMD Socket FP7 (AMD) vs Intel Socket 1700 (Intel)
• Architecture: Zen 3+ (AMD) vs Raptor Lake (Intel)
• Codename: Rembrandt-R (AMD) vs Raptor Lake-R (Intel)
• Process Node: 6 nm (AMD) vs 10 nm (Intel)
• Foundry: TSMC (AMD) vs Intel (Intel)
• Die Size: 208 mm² (AMD) vs 257 mm² (Intel)
• L1 Cache: 64 KB per core (AMD) vs 80 KB per core (Intel)
• L2 Cache: 512 KB per core (AMD) vs 2 MB per core (Intel)
• L3 Cache: 16 MB shared (AMD) vs 36 MB shared (Intel)
• Memory Support: DDR5 (AMD) vs DDR4, DDR5 (Intel)
• Memory Bandwidth: 76.8 GB/s (AMD) vs null (Intel)
• ECC Memory: false (AMD) vs true (Intel)
• PCIe: Gen 4, 20 Lanes (AMD) vs Gen 5, 16 Lanes (Intel)
• Integrated Graphics: Radeon 660M (AMD) vs UHD Graphics 770 (Intel)
• Market Segment: Mobile (AMD) vs Desktop (Intel)
• Release Date: 2024-08-31 (AMD) vs 2024-06-30 (Intel)
• Multiplier Unlocked: false (AMD) vs true (Intel)
• Part Number: 100-000001632(FP7)100-000001634(FP7r2) (AMD) vs Q49DSRNJC (Intel)

The Verdict

The recorded data presents a clear picture for the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS: it has a complete benchmark profile and a 73rd percentile standing among all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score of 19364 places it within 0.7% of its nearest rivals, including the Intel Core i7-8700K and the Intel Core i7-10700F. This indicates a processor that sits comfortably in the upper-middle tier of the database's performance distribution.

For the Intel Core i9-14901KE, the database contains no benchmark scores, no average score, and no nearest rivals. Its percentile ranking is recorded at 50, but this figure carries little interpretive weight without underlying measurements to support it. The specification data shows a high-core-count desktop part with substantial cache and a 125 W TDP, but the absence of recorded performance data prevents any quantitative assessment.

The choice between these two processors depends entirely on what the data can support. For users who prioritize the mobile form factor, the Ryzen 5 7533HS offers a complete, measured performance profile with a 35 W TDP and integrated Radeon 660M graphics. For users who need a desktop processor with 8 cores, 16 threads, and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, the Core i9-14901KE offers those specifications, but the database does not yet contain the benchmark results needed to validate its performance claims.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS wins in every category where the database has recorded measurements, simply because the Intel Core i9-14901KE has no recorded benchmark data. The Ryzen's wins span Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 tests in both single-core and multi-core variants, plus Passmark tests covering data compression, encryption, extended instructions, prime number finding, floating point math, integer math, multithread performance, physics, random string sorting, and single-thread performance.

Looking at the Ryzen's individual scores reveals where its strengths lie. The data compression score of 168692 and the multithread score of 14520 suggest strong parallel workload handling. The single-thread score of 2740 in Passmark and 1742 in Cinebench R23 indicate respectable per-core performance for a mobile part. The 6 nm TSMC process and 35 W TDP position it as an efficiency-oriented mobile processor, and the 73rd percentile ranking confirms it performs well above the median CPU in the database.

For the Intel Core i9-14901KE, the specification sheet points to potential advantages in raw compute capacity: 8 cores versus 6, a 5.80 GHz boost clock versus 4.40 GHz, and 36 MB of L3 cache versus 16 MB. The desktop socket, unlocked multiplier, and PCIe Gen 5 support suggest a part designed for enthusiast desktop builds. The ECC memory support and dual memory type compatibility (DDR4 and DDR5) add flexibility for workstation-oriented configurations. However, without recorded benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm whether these specifications translate into measured performance wins.

The data supports a conditional split: the Ryzen 5 7533HS wins on measured performance and efficiency metrics within the database, while the Core i9-14901KE wins on paper specifications for core count, clock speed, cache capacity, and platform features. The absence of Intel benchmark data means any performance comparison remains speculative until the database records scores for that processor.