AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Core i7-10700F Comparison

The Intel Core i7-10700F and AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS represent two distinct approaches to modern computing: a desktop-focused, high-core-count part from Intel’s 10th Gen lineup against a power-efficient, mobile-oriented chip from AMD’s 7000 series. Benchmark data shows a clear overall winner, but the AMD part carves out specific niches where its architecture shines. The Intel processor takes 14 of the 17 head-to-head comparisons, while the AMD chip claims 3 wins, yet the margin of victory varies dramatically by workload.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most decisive Intel victories come in data compression and random string sorting. In PassMark’s data compression test, the i7-10700F scores 253,358 against the Ryzen 5 7533HS’s 168,692, a 50.2% lead. Random string sorting shows an even larger gap: 31,625 versus 17,669, a 79% advantage. These results indicate the Intel chip’s 8 cores and 16 threads provide substantial throughput advantages in memory-intensive, parallelizable tasks.

The Cinebench suite tells a consistent story across all six tests. Whether running R15, R20, or R23, the Intel part wins both multi-core and single-core by exactly 10.9%. For example, Cinebench R23 multi-core shows 13,689 versus 12,342, while single-core lands at 1,932 versus 1,742. This uniformity suggests the 10.9% delta is a fundamental architectural advantage rather than a workload-specific quirk. The i7-10700F’s 4.80 GHz boost clock clearly outpaces the Ryzen’s 4.40 GHz, and the extra two cores and four threads compound that advantage in multi-threaded rendering.

PassMark’s math and instruction tests follow the same pattern. Floating point math favors Intel by 38.8% (38,578 versus 27,800), integer math by 23.2% (62,579 versus 50,800), and extended instructions by 46.1% (16,389 versus 11,219). The multithread score gives Intel an 11.8% edge (16,227 versus 14,520), while single-thread is closer at 4.9% (2,875 versus 2,740). The 3DMark results, available only for the Intel part, show scores of 6,476 for 16 threads and 6679 for max threads, reinforcing its multi-core strength.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS wins are fewer but notable. Its biggest victory is in data encryption, scoring 10,718 against Intel’s 5,378 — a 49.8% advantage that flips the compression result almost exactly. The AMD chip also wins PassMark physics (821 versus 803, a 2.2% lead) and find prime numbers (48 versus 47, a 2.1% edge). These wins suggest the Zen 3+ architecture handles certain cryptographic and physics workloads more efficiently, even with fewer cores. The overall average benchmark scores are nearly identical — 19,499 for Intel versus 19,364 for AMD — placing both at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs.

Architecture Differences

The fundamental divide is process technology. Intel builds the i7-10700F on a 14 nm node at its own foundry, while AMD uses TSMC’s 6 nm process for the Ryzen 5 7533HS. The AMD chip’s die measures 208 mm², a figure not available for the Intel part. This process advantage allows the Ryzen to pack Zen 3+ architecture into a 35W TDP, compared to the Intel chip’s 65W TDP.

Core counts differ significantly: Intel provides 8 cores and 16 threads, while AMD offers 6 cores and 12 threads. Cache configurations show a split — both share 16 MB of L3 cache, but per-core L2 cache differs: Intel uses 256 KB per core, AMD doubles that to 512 KB per core. L1 cache remains identical at 64 KB per core. The extra L2 cache per core helps AMD offset its core-count deficit in certain workloads.

Memory support marks another generational divide. The i7-10700F uses DDR4 with dual-channel memory and 46.9 GB/s bandwidth, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS supports DDR5 with dual-channel memory and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth — a 63% bandwidth advantage for AMD. PCIe connectivity also differs: Intel provides Gen 3 with 16 CPU lanes, while AMD offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes. The Ryzen includes integrated Radeon 660M graphics, whereas the i7-10700F has no integrated graphics listed.

The Intel chip uses the LGA 1200 socket and targets the desktop segment, released April 2020. The AMD part uses the FP7 socket, targets mobile, and released August 2024 — over four years later. Both are currently listed as active production parts, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-10700F is the clear choice for multi-threaded desktop workloads. Its 10.9% lead across every Cinebench test makes it superior for video rendering, 3D modeling, and any task that scales with core count. The 50.2% data compression and 79% random string sorting advantages point to strengths in database operations, file archiving, and data processing. For general productivity, the 23.2% integer math and 38.8% floating point leads cover spreadsheet calculations, coding, and scientific computing. The 4.9% single-thread advantage also gives it a slight edge in everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS wins where its architecture and modern features matter most. The 49.8% data encryption lead makes it the better option for security-focused tasks, VPN operations, and encrypted storage workloads. The physics score advantage (2.2%) suggests it handles game physics and simulation tasks slightly better, despite having fewer cores. The prime number finding edge (2.1%) hints at efficient integer operations in specific mathematical contexts. More broadly, the AMD chip’s 35W TDP versus Intel’s 65W means it belongs in thin-and-light laptops where battery life and thermals take priority over raw compute. Its DDR5 support and 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth provide future-proofing for memory-hungry applications, and the integrated Radeon 660M graphics eliminate the need for a separate GPU in basic systems.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-10700F has 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: How much faster is the Intel chip in multi-core rendering?

A: The i7-10700F leads by 10.9% across all three Cinebench versions. In R23 multi-core, it scores 13,689 versus the Ryzen’s 12,342.

Q: Is the AMD chip better at any major benchmark?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 7533HS wins PassMark data encryption by 49.8% (10,718 versus 5,378). It also edges out Intel in physics (821 versus 803) and prime numbers (48 versus 47).

Q: What memory types do these processors support?

A: The Intel i7-10700F supports DDR4 with 46.9 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS supports DDR5 with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Do both processors have integrated graphics?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS includes Radeon 660M integrated graphics. The Intel Core i7-10700F has no integrated graphics listed.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel i7-10700F boosts to 4.80 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS boosts to 4.40 GHz.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i7-10700F | AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 6 |

| Threads | 16 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 2.90 GHz | 3.30 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | 4.40 GHz |

| TDP | 65W | 35W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1200 | AMD Socket FP7 |

| Architecture | Comet Lake | Zen 3+ |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Die Size | Not listed | 208 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 46.9 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes | Gen 4, 20 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | None | Radeon 660M |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2020-04-29 | 2024-08-31 |

| Part Number | SRH70 | 100-000001632(FP7)100-000001634(FP7r2) |