AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS

CORE STATE Rembrandt-R
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.3 Base / 4.4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 35W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 3+
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
AMD
AMD

Ryzen AI 9 365

CORE STATE Strix Point
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,243
2,842
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
175
303
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
5,183
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
731
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
12,342
18,698
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,742
1,992
passmark_data_compression
168,692
354,510
passmark_data_encryption
10,718
18,297
passmark_extended_instructions
11,219
25,113
passmark_find_prime_numbers
48
117
passmark_floating_point_math
27,800
62,802
passmark_integer_math
50,800
101,831
passmark_multithread
14,520
29,467
passmark_physics
821
1,704
passmark_random_string_sorting
17,669
39,447
passmark_single_thread
2,740
3,841
passmark_singlethread
2,740
3,841
geekbench_multicore
N/A
13,760
geekbench_singlecore
N/A
2,253

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database records a decisive split between these two mobile processors. Across every recorded test, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 finishes ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS. Of the fifteen head-to-head comparisons, the Ryzen AI 9 365 wins all fifteen. The Ryzen 5 7533HS does not record a single victory in any measured workload.

The largest margin appears in the PassMark prime number finding test. The Ryzen AI 9 365 scores 117, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS scores 48. That is a 59 percent gap in favor of the newer part. The Ryzen AI 9 365 also shows a 56.3 percent advantage in Cinebench R15 multi-core, scoring 2842 against 1243 for the Ryzen 5 7533HS. These two results set the tone: the gap is not marginal, it is substantial across both synthetic rendering and integer-heavy workloads.

Single-core performance tells a similar but slightly narrower story. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the Ryzen AI 9 365 scores 303, the Ryzen 5 7533HS scores 175, a 42.2 percent deficit. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Ryzen AI 9 365 scores 1992 against 1742 for the older chip, a 12.6 percent lead. The single-thread PassMark test shows the Ryzen AI 9 365 at 3841 versus 2740 for the Ryzen 5 7533HS, a 28.7 percent difference. The single-core lead is real but smaller than the multi-core lead, which suggests the core count and thread count differences compound the architectural gains.

Multi-threaded workloads amplify the gap further. Cinebench R23 multi-core shows the Ryzen AI 9 365 at 18698, the Ryzen 5 7533HS at 12342, a 34 percent deficit for the latter. PassMark multithread shows 29467 versus 14520, a 50.7 percent gap. PassMark integer math records 101831 for the Ryzen AI 9 365 and 50800 for the Ryzen 5 7533HS, a 50.1 percent difference. Floating point math shows 62802 versus 27800, a 55.7 percent gap. The pattern is consistent: the Ryzen AI 9 365 delivers roughly double the throughput in most parallel workloads.

Data compression and encryption show similar proportions. PassMark data compression scores 354510 for the Ryzen AI 9 365 and 168692 for the Ryzen 5 7533HS, a 52.4 percent gap. Data encryption records 18297 versus 10718, a 41.4 percent difference. Extended instruction workloads show 25113 versus 11219, a 55.3 percent gap. Random string sorting, a memory-heavy test, shows 39447 versus 17669, a 55.2 percent difference. Physics simulation in PassMark records 1704 versus 821, a 51.8 percent gap.

The average benchmark score reinforces the overall picture. The Ryzen AI 9 365 sits at 40048, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS sits at 19364. That is more than a doubling of the average score. The percentile ranking versus all CPUs also differs: the Ryzen AI 9 365 lands at the 87th percentile, the Ryzen 5 7533HS at the 73rd percentile.

Where Each One Wins

The data does not support a use-case split where the Ryzen 5 7533HS takes any category. Every recorded benchmark favors the Ryzen AI 9 365. For single-threaded responsiveness, the Ryzen AI 9 365 leads by 12.6 percent in Cinebench R23 single-core, 28.7 percent in PassMark single-thread, and 42.2 percent in Cinebench R15 single-core. Applications that depend on one or two fast cores, such as lightweight document editing or basic web browsing, will see a measurable advantage from the Ryzen AI 9 365.

For heavily threaded workloads, the Ryzen AI 9 365 extends its lead further. The 34 percent margin in Cinebench R23 multi-core and the 50.7 percent margin in PassMark multithread indicate that rendering, video encoding, and compilation tasks will complete substantially faster on the Ryzen AI 9 365. The 10-core, 20-thread configuration doubles the thread count of the 6-core, 12-thread Ryzen 5 7533HS, which directly explains the larger multi-threaded deltas.

Memory-sensitive workloads also favor the Ryzen AI 9 365. Random string sorting, which stresses memory bandwidth and latency, shows a 55.2 percent gap. The Ryzen AI 9 365 supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS supports only DDR5. The recorded memory bandwidth for the Ryzen AI 9 365 is 89.6 GB/s, compared to 76.8 GB/s for the Ryzen 5 7533HS. That 12.8 GB/s difference contributes to the sorting and compression results.

The Ryzen 5 7533HS does not win any benchmark category. Its only potential role in a comparison is as a lower-power alternative: it carries a 35 W TDP versus 28 W for the Ryzen AI 9 365, but that higher power draw does not translate into any measured performance win. The data shows no workload where the older chip takes the lead.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations. The Ryzen 5 7533HS uses Zen 3+ under the codename Rembrandt-R, part of the 7000 series. The Ryzen AI 9 365 uses Zen 5 under the codename Strix Point, part of the Ryzen AI 300 series. The Zen 5 architecture in the Ryzen AI 9 365 combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS uses only Zen 3+ cores.

Process technology differs as well. The Ryzen 5 7533HS is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 208 mm². The Ryzen AI 9 365 uses a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The smaller process node contributes to the higher boost clock and lower TDP of the Ryzen AI 9 365.

Core counts and cache hierarchies show clear generational changes. The Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Ryzen AI 9 365 has 10 cores and 20 threads. Per-core L1 cache is 64 KB for the Ryzen 5 7533HS and 80 KB for the Ryzen AI 9 365. Per-core L2 cache is 512 KB for the older chip and 1 MB for the newer one. Both share 16 MB of L3 cache. The larger per-core caches on the Ryzen AI 9 365 help explain its single-core wins, especially in the PassMark single-thread test where it leads by 28.7 percent.

Memory controllers differ in supported types and bandwidth. The Ryzen 5 7533HS supports DDR5 only, with a dual-channel bus and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Ryzen AI 9 365 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, also dual-channel, with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. Both processors disable ECC memory support.

PCIe lane counts differ. The Ryzen 5 7533HS exposes 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU. The Ryzen AI 9 365 exposes 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU. Both use PCIe Gen 4, but the older chip offers four more lanes for expansion devices.

Integrated graphics differ substantially. The Ryzen 5 7533HS pairs with a Radeon 660M. The Ryzen AI 9 365 pairs with a Radeon 880M. The newer Radeon 880M benefits from the newer architecture and higher memory bandwidth, though the database does not include dedicated graphics benchmarks for either.

The socket changes between the two. The Ryzen 5 7533HS uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 uses AMD Socket FP8. This means they are not interchangeable on the same motherboard, even though both target the mobile segment.

The Ryzen 5 7533HS has two recorded part numbers: 100-000001632 (FP7) and 100-000001634 (FP7r2). The Ryzen AI 9 365 has one part number: 100-000001530. Both processors are production active and have locked multipliers.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several recorded specifications. Core count: 6 versus 10. Thread count: 12 versus 20. Base clock: 3.30 GHz for the Ryzen 5 7533HS versus 2.00 GHz for the Ryzen AI 9 365. Boost clock: 4.40 GHz versus 5.00 GHz. TDP: 35 W versus 28 W. Socket: FP7 versus FP8. Architecture: Zen 3+ versus Zen 5. Codename: Rembrandt-R versus Strix Point. Process node: 6 nm versus 4 nm. Die size: 208 mm² versus 233 mm². L1 cache per core: 64 KB versus 80 KB. L2 cache per core: 512 KB versus 1 MB. Memory support: DDR5 only versus DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Memory bandwidth: 76.8 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s. PCIe lanes: 20 versus 16. Integrated graphics: Radeon 660M versus Radeon 880M. Release date: the Ryzen 5 7533HS released on 2024-08-31, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 released on 2024-06-30. The Ryzen AI 9 365 launched about two months earlier.

The base clock difference is notable: the Ryzen 5 7533HS has a higher base clock of 3.30 GHz versus 2.00 GHz for the Ryzen AI 9 365. However, the boost clock reverses that: 4.40 GHz for the older chip versus 5.00 GHz for the newer one. The higher boost clock on the Ryzen AI 9 365, combined with the Zen 5 architecture, explains why it wins every single-core test despite the lower base clock.

The TDP difference is counterintuitive given the performance results. The Ryzen 5 7533HS has a 35 W TDP, which is 7 W higher than the 28 W TDP of the Ryzen AI 9 365. Yet the lower-TDP processor outperforms the higher-TDP one in every benchmark. This indicates that the 4 nm process and Zen 5 architecture deliver more performance per watt, though the database does not include power efficiency measurements.

Both processors share the same manufacturer, market segment (mobile), production status (active), multiplier unlock state (locked), and ECC support (disabled). Both have 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Both use dual-channel memory buses. Both use PCIe Gen 4.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has 10 cores and 20 threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: How large is the single-core performance gap?

A: The Ryzen AI 9 365 leads by 12.6 percent in Cinebench R23 single-core, 28.7 percent in PassMark single-thread, and 42.2 percent in Cinebench R15 single-core.

Q: How large is the multi-core performance gap?

A: The Ryzen AI 9 365 leads by 34 percent in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 50.7 percent in PassMark multithread. The largest multi-core gap is 56.3 percent in Cinebench R15 multi-core.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Ryzen 5 7533HS supports DDR5 only. The Ryzen AI 9 365 supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The recorded memory bandwidth is 76.8 GB/s for the Ryzen 5 7533HS and 89.6 GB/s for the Ryzen AI 9 365.

Q: Are these processors on the same socket?

A: No. The Ryzen 5 7533HS uses AMD Socket FP7. The Ryzen AI 9 365 uses AMD Socket FP8. They are not compatible with the same motherboard.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Ryzen AI 9 365 has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Ryzen 5 7533HS has a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The Ryzen 5 7533HS has a higher base clock at 3.30 GHz versus 2.00 GHz for the Ryzen AI 9 365.

Q: What are the integrated graphics on each processor?

A: The Ryzen 5 7533HS uses a Radeon 660M. The Ryzen AI 9 365 uses a Radeon 880M. The database does not include graphics benchmarks for either.

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen AI 9 365 has an average benchmark score of 40048, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS has an average score of 19364. The Ryzen AI 9 365 ranks at the 87th percentile of all CPUs, and the Ryzen 5 7533HS ranks at the 73rd percentile.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
5 7533HS
AI 9 365
Core Specs
Cores
6
10 +66.7%
Threads
12
20 +66.7%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.3
2 -39.4%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.4
5 +13.6%
Frequency (GHz)
3.3
2 -39.4%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.4
5 +13.6%
Multiplier
33
20 -39.4%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB (shared)
16 MB
Power
TDP (W)
35
28 -20.0%
Configurable TDP
35-54 W
15-54 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 3+
Zen 5
Codename
Rembrandt-R
Strix Point
Generation
Ryzen 5 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt))
Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Process Size
6 nm
4 nm
Die Size
208 mm²
233 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR5, LPDDR5X
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
No
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP7
AMD Socket FP8
PCIe
Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
—
4 + 6
E-Core Frequency
—
1400 MHz up to 3.2 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
—
Yes / 50 TOPS
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 660M
Radeon 880M
Other
Market
Mobile
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Part Number
100-000001632(FP7)100-000001634(FP7r2)
100-000001530
Package
FP7, FP7r2
FP8
Tj Max
95°C
100°C
View Ryzen 5 7533HS Details View Ryzen AI 9 365 Details