AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 Comparison

The Verdict

The benchmark data positions the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 as the decisive winner over the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS across every recorded test. The Ryzen AI 5 340 wins all 15 head-to-head comparisons, with no benchmark favoring the 7533HS. The average benchmark score reflects this gap: the Ryzen AI 5 340 records 25981, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS trails at 19364, a difference of roughly 34 percent. The Ryzen AI 5 340 also holds a higher percentile ranking among all CPUs at 78, compared to 73 for the older part. For any workload measured in this database, the Ryzen AI 5 340 delivers higher performance. The Ryzen 5 7533HS remains an active production part with a 6-core, 12-thread configuration, but its Zen 3+ architecture and older process node place it behind the Zen 5-based Ryzen AI 5 340 in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has the higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 boosts to 4.80 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS reaches 4.40 GHz.

Q: How do the two processors compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core performance?

A: The Ryzen AI 5 340 scores 12532, which is 1.5 percent ahead of the Ryzen 5 7533HS at 12342.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Ryzen 5 7533HS has 16 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Ryzen AI 5 340 has 8 MB.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two?

A: The Ryzen 5 7533HS uses TSMC's 6 nm node, while the Ryzen AI 5 340 uses TSMC's 4 nm node.

Q: Which CPU supports higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Ryzen AI 5 340 supports 89.6 GB/s, compared to 76.8 GB/s for the Ryzen 5 7533HS.

Q: Do both processors have the same core and thread counts?

A: Yes, both have 6 cores and 12 threads.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent distinct architectural generations from AMD. The Ryzen 5 7533HS uses the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename, while the Ryzen AI 5 340 uses the Zen 5 architecture with the Krackan Point codename. This generational gap is reflected in the process node: the 7533HS is built on TSMC's 6 nm process, while the Ryzen AI 5 340 is built on TSMC's 4 nm process. The die size also differs, with the 7533HS measuring 208 mm² and the Ryzen AI 5 340 measuring 195 mm².

Cache configurations differ notably between the two. The Ryzen 5 7533HS provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 cache per core, with a shared 16 MB L3 cache. The Ryzen AI 5 340 provides a larger 80 KB L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, but a smaller 8 MB L3 cache. The larger per-core caches in the Ryzen AI 5 340 support its higher instruction throughput, while the 7533HS compensates with double the L3 capacity.

The integrated graphics also differ. The Ryzen 5 7533HS includes a Radeon 660M, while the Ryzen AI 5 340 includes a Radeon 840M. Both processors support DDR5 memory and dual-channel memory buses, but the Ryzen AI 5 340 adds LPDDR5X support. The Ryzen AI 5 340 uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS uses AMD Socket FP7. The Ryzen AI 5 340 offers 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU, whereas the Ryzen 5 7533HS offers 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes.

Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and neither supports ECC memory. The Ryzen 5 7533HS was released in the 7000 series with a generation label of Ryzen 5 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt)), while the Ryzen AI 5 340 belongs to the Ryzen AI 300 series with a generation label of Zen 5 / Zen 5c. Both are mobile market segments and remain in active production.

Specification Differences

The base clock differs substantially. The Ryzen 5 7533HS runs at 3.30 GHz, while the Ryzen AI 5 340 runs at 2.00 GHz. The boost clock reverses this relationship: the Ryzen AI 5 340 reaches 4.80 GHz, while the 7533HS reaches 4.40 GHz. The TDP also differs, with the 7533HS rated at 35 watts and the Ryzen AI 5 340 rated at 28 watts.

Memory bandwidth favors the Ryzen AI 5 340 at 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s for the 7533HS. The memory support differs as well: the 7533HS supports DDR5 only, while the Ryzen AI 5 340 supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X. PCIe lane counts differ, with the 7533HS providing 20 lanes and the Ryzen AI 5 340 providing 16 lanes, both at Gen 4.

The part numbers differ: the 7533HS lists 100-000001632(FP7) and 100-000001634(FP7r2), while the Ryzen AI 5 340 lists 100-000001602. The release dates differ by several months, with the 7533HS released on 2024-08-31 and the Ryzen AI 5 340 released on 2025-01-05. Neither processor has a recorded launch MSRP in the database.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Ryzen AI 5 340 wins every head-to-head benchmark in the database. The largest margin appears in Cinebench R15 multi-core, where the Ryzen AI 5 340 scores 1915 against 1243 for the 7533HS, a 35.1 percent advantage. Cinebench R15 single-core shows a 27.9 percent lead, with scores of 242.6 versus 175. In Cinebench R23, the gap narrows considerably: multi-core scores are 12532 versus 12342, a 1.5 percent difference, and single-core scores are 1915.5 versus 1742, a 9.1 percent difference.

PassMark tests show consistent double-digit leads for the Ryzen AI 5 340. Data compression scores 229796 versus 168692, a 26.6 percent advantage. Extended instructions show a 31.8 percent lead, with scores of 16440 versus 11219. Floating point math favors the Ryzen AI 5 340 by 30.4 percent, 39967 versus 27800. Integer math shows a 19.5 percent lead, 63078 versus 50800. Find prime numbers scores 72 versus 48, a 33.3 percent advantage. Random string sorting shows a 29.2 percent lead, 24970 versus 17669.

Multi-threaded performance in PassMark shows the Ryzen AI 5 340 at 19506 versus 14520, a 25.6 percent lead. Physics scores follow a similar pattern: 1095 versus 821, a 25 percent advantage. Single-thread performance in PassMark scores 3683 versus 2740, a 25.6 percent lead. Data encryption shows the smallest margin after Cinebench R23, with 11470 versus 10718, a 6.6 percent advantage for the Ryzen AI 5 340. The repeated single-thread test confirms the same result at 3683 versus 2740. Across all recorded workloads, the Ryzen AI 5 340 does not lose a single comparison.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 wins in every measured category. Its largest advantages appear in older Cinebench R15 multi-core and single-core tests, where it leads by 35.1 percent and 27.9 percent respectively. These results indicate a substantial generational improvement in both multi-threaded throughput and single-threaded responsiveness. PassMark extended instructions and find prime numbers also show large gaps, suggesting the Zen 5 architecture handles complex instruction workloads and integer-heavy algorithms with significantly higher efficiency.

The Ryzen 5 7533HS does not record a single benchmark win. Its closest relative performance comes in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the Ryzen AI 5 340 leads by only 1.5 percent. This near-parity in modern multi-core rendering suggests that the 7533HS still delivers competitive sustained multi-threaded performance despite its older architecture. The 7533HS also offers more PCIe Gen 4 lanes (20 versus 16) and a larger L3 cache (16 MB versus 8 MB), which may matter for specific system-level configurations, but these advantages do not translate into any recorded performance win.

The Ryzen AI 5 340 additionally carries a lower TDP of 28 watts compared to 35 watts for the 7533HS, meaning the higher performance comes with a lower rated power draw. It also supports a higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and adds LPDDR5X support. The Ryzen AI 5 340 sits at the 78th percentile among all CPUs in the database, while the 7533HS sits at the 73rd percentile. The Ryzen AI 5 340's nearest rivals in average score include the Intel Core i7-14701TE at 26013 (0.1 percent behind) and the AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS at 26106 (0.5 percent ahead). The 7533HS, by contrast, competes with the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V at 19368 (0 percent delta) and the Intel Core i7-8700K at 19238 (0.7 percent behind). The data clearly favors the Ryzen AI 5 340 for any workload where processor performance is the primary criterion.