AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 vs Intel Core i7-14701TE Comparison

The Intel Core i7-14701TE and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 are closely matched processors, with average benchmark scores of 26013 and 25981 respectively. This places the Intel part a mere 0.1% ahead of the AMD chip, and both occupy the 78th percentile among all CPUs. Despite this statistical near-tie in overall average, the head-to-head benchmark results reveal a significant divergence in workload-specific strengths, with the Intel chip taking 8 wins and the AMD chip taking 7.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most dramatic split between the two processors appears in the Cinebench suite. The Intel Core i7-14701TE dominates the newer Cinebench R23 test, scoring 17035 in multi-core against the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340's 12532, a 35.9% advantage. The single-core R23 result shows a similar trend, with Intel scoring 2405 versus AMD's 1915.5, a 25.6% lead. However, the older Cinebench R15 test tells a different story: the AMD chip wins multi-core with a score of 1915 compared to Intel's 1716, a 10.4% margin. The R15 single-core test is a near dead heat, with AMD scoring 242.6 against Intel's 242, a mere 0.2% difference.

The Passmark suite further illustrates the contrasting strengths. The Intel processor shows overwhelming dominance in specific computational tasks. In the find prime numbers test, Intel scores 143 versus AMD's 72, a massive 98.6% advantage. The physics test also favors Intel heavily, with a score of 1860 compared to AMD's 1095, representing a 69.9% lead. Floating point math also goes to Intel, with a score of 50219 over AMD's 39967, a 25.7% difference. Smaller wins for Intel appear in data encryption (11699 vs 11470, a 2% lead), integer math (65792 vs 63078, a 4.3% lead), and the multithread test (20042 vs 19506, a 2.7% lead).

Conversely, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 secures its wins in other areas. The most striking victory is in the Passmark single-thread tests, where AMD scores 3683 against Intel's 2637, a 28.4% advantage. This is a substantial margin that suggests superior per-core efficiency in certain workloads. AMD also wins in extended instructions, scoring 16440 over Intel's 14354, a 12.7% lead. Data compression goes to AMD with a score of 229796 versus 220520, a 4% difference, and random string sorting sees AMD at 24970 versus Intel's 22760, an 8.9% margin. These results indicate that while Intel holds a lead in raw multi-threaded throughput in some tests, AMD excels in tasks that leverage specific instruction sets and single-thread efficiency.

Architecture Differences

The fundamental architectural split is clear from the process node. The Intel Core i7-14701TE is built on a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. This difference in manufacturing technology likely contributes to the significant disparity in power consumption, with Intel rated at a 45 W TDP and AMD at just 28 W.

The core configurations also differ substantially. The Intel chip features 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD chip has 6 cores and 12 threads. This core count advantage helps explain Intel's strong multi-core performance in tests like Cinebench R23. The Intel processor is based on the Raptor Lake architecture (specifically Raptor Lake-R), while AMD uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Krackan Point codename. The Zen 5 generation is referred to as "Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)," suggesting a hybrid core design.

Cache hierarchies present another key difference. Both have the same 80 KB L1 cache per core. However, the Intel chip has a larger 2 MB L2 cache per core, compared to AMD's 1 MB per core. The L3 cache shows a stark contrast: Intel provides 33 MB shared, while AMD offers only 8 MB. This larger cache pool on the Intel side could be a factor in its multi-threaded performance. The die sizes also differ, with Intel at 257 mm² and AMD at 195 mm².

Memory support and platform features further separate the two. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The AMD part has a listed memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, a figure not provided for the Intel chip. Intel supports ECC memory, while AMD does not. The PCIe implementation is also different: Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, while AMD uses Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes. The integrated graphics differ as well, with Intel featuring UHD Graphics 770 and AMD featuring Radeon 840M. Finally, the market segments diverge, with Intel targeting Desktop on Socket 1700 and AMD targeting Mobile on Socket FP8.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE has an average benchmark score of 26013, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340's average score of 25981.

Q: In which major benchmark does the AMD processor outperform the Intel processor by the largest margin?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 wins the Passmark single-thread test with a score of 3683, which is 28.4% higher than the Intel Core i7-14701TE's score of 2637.

Q: What is the core and thread count difference between the two chips?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: How do the processors compare in terms of power consumption?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE has a TDP of 45 W, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 has a significantly lower TDP of 28 W.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 does not.

Q: What is the difference in their L3 cache sizes?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE has 33 MB of shared L3 cache, whereas the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 has only 8 MB of L3 cache.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several key specifications. The Intel Core i7-14701TE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The base clock speeds are 2.10 GHz for Intel and 2.00 GHz for AMD. The boost clocks are 5.20 GHz for Intel and 4.80 GHz for AMD. The TDP is 45 W for Intel and 28 W for AMD. The sockets are different as well: Intel uses Socket 1700, while AMD uses Socket FP8. The process nodes are 10 nm (Intel) and 4 nm (TSMC for AMD). The L2 cache is 2 MB per core for Intel and 1 MB per core for AMD, while the L3 cache is 33 MB shared for Intel and 8 MB for AMD. Memory support differs, with Intel offering DDR4 and DDR5 and AMD offering DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The AMD chip has a listed memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, which is not provided for the Intel chip. ECC memory support is present on Intel but absent on AMD. PCIe generation is Gen 5 for Intel and Gen 4 for AMD, both with 16 CPU lanes. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770 for Intel and Radeon 840M for AMD. The market segment is Desktop for Intel and Mobile for AMD. The release dates also differ, with Intel launching on 2024-06-30 and AMD on 2025-01-05.

The Verdict

The benchmark data indicates a clear split in workload suitability. The Intel Core i7-14701TE is the stronger choice for multi-threaded, compute-heavy tasks that rely on raw core count and cache. Its 35.9% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 98.6% lead in prime number finding are definitive. It also offers ECC memory support, which may be a requirement for certain professional or server-like uses, despite being a desktop chip. The 45 W TDP is higher, but that is the price for the extra cores and performance in these specific tests.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 presents a compelling case for efficiency and specific single-threaded workloads. Its 28.4% win in the Passmark single-thread test is significant and suggests that for applications that are not heavily multi-threaded, it may offer better responsiveness. Its 12.7% lead in extended instructions also points to optimization for modern, specialized instruction sets. The substantially lower 28 W TDP makes it a more power-efficient option, which is particularly relevant for its mobile market segment.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14701TE is the definitive winner in scenarios that demand maximum multi-core throughput. This includes rendering tasks as evidenced by its 35.9% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core, physics simulations where it leads by 69.9%, and floating-point math operations where it holds a 25.7% advantage. The 98.6% margin in prime number finding indicates a strong performance in integer-heavy, single-threaded loops that are parallelizable. The presence of 33 MB of L3 cache and 8 cores makes it well-suited for data-heavy, multi-threaded workloads.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 is the winner for tasks that prioritize single-thread performance and power efficiency. The 28.4% lead in Passmark single-thread is its strongest argument, suggesting it may be snappier for everyday desktop use and lightly-threaded applications. Its 12.7% lead in extended instructions makes it a better fit for workloads that utilize modern SIMD or specialized instruction sets. The data compression and random string sorting wins, while smaller, indicate a slight edge in data manipulation tasks. Its 28 W TDP makes it the clear choice for battery-powered or thermally constrained systems, which aligns with its mobile market segment and newer 4 nm process node.