AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data shows a dominant performance profile for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE across nearly every measured workload. Out of 17 head-to-head comparisons, the PRO 5655GE takes 16 wins, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS secures a single victory. The consistency of the margin is striking, with most deltas clustering around 20% to 28%.

In Cinebench rendering tests, the PRO 5655GE leads by a uniform margin. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 15504 against 12342 for the 7533HS, a delta of -20.4% when measured from the perspective of the mobile part. Single-core R23 shows the same pattern: 2188 versus 1742, again a -20.4% delta. The identical proportional gap appears in Cinebench R20 multi-core (6511 vs 5183) and single-core (918 vs 731), as well as Cinebench R15 multi-core (1562 vs 1243) and single-core (220 vs 175). This uniformity suggests the performance difference is structural rather than workload-specific.

PassMark results reinforce the picture. The PRO 5655GE posts 228037 in data compression against 168692, a -26% delta. Data encryption shows 14509 versus 10718, a -26.1% gap. Extended instructions score 15714 versus 11219, the largest percentage gap in the dataset at -28.6%. Floating point math delivers 38204 versus 27800 (-27.2%), integer math 67582 versus 50800 (-24.8%), and random string sorting 23769 versus 17669 (-25.7%). Multithread performance measures 18057 versus 14520, a -19.6% delta. Single-thread performance shows 3240 versus 2740, a -15.4% gap, the smallest of the major workload deltas. Even the prime number search, a test where both chips land nearly level, goes to the PRO 5655GE at 49 versus 48, a -2% difference.

The lone exception is PassMark physics. Here the 7533HS scores 821 against 648 for the PRO 5655GE, a 26.7% advantage. This is an unusual outlier given the rest of the dataset, where the desktop part wins by double digits across the board. The physics test appears to reward a characteristic that favors the mobile chip, though the overall benchmark average still heavily favors the PRO 5655GE.

The average benchmark scores place the PRO 5655GE at 25880, compared to 19364 for the 7533HS. Percentile rankings follow: the PRO 5655GE sits at the 78th percentile against all CPUs, while the 7533HS sits at the 73rd. The nearest rivals in the database confirm the positioning. The PRO 5655GE trades blows with the Intel Core i7-11700K (delta 0.3), AMD Ryzen 5 230 (0.4), AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (-0.4), and Intel Core i7-14701TE (-0.5). The 7533HS sits in a different performance bracket, alongside the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (0), Intel Core i5-1345U (-0.2), Intel Core i7-8700K (0.7), and Intel Core i7-10700F (-0.7).

Where Each One Wins

The PRO 5655GE wins in every Cinebench iteration, both single-core and multi-core. Its PassMark wins span integer math, floating point math, encryption, compression, extended instructions, random string sorting, multithread, and single-thread tests. This is a comprehensive sweep across synthetic CPU workloads that typically respond to clock speed, memory bandwidth, and core efficiency.

The 7533HS wins only in PassMark physics. That result suggests a specific advantage in a physics simulation workload, possibly related to how the workload schedules threads or uses certain instruction paths. The 821 score versus 648 is a 26.7% margin, significant in isolation but insufficient to offset the broader trend.

For general productivity, rendering, and compute-heavy tasks, the data points clearly to the PRO 5655GE. For workloads that resemble the PassMark physics test, the 7533HS holds an edge. The mobile chip also carries a lower TDP of 35 watts against 65 watts for the desktop part, which indicates it can deliver its physics advantage within a tighter power envelope, though the benchmark data itself does not directly measure power consumption.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different generations and use different underlying designs. The 7533HS is a 7000 series mobile part built on Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R. The PRO 5655GE is a 5000 series desktop part built on Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Cezanne. Both are 6-core, 12-thread processors with matching boost clocks of 4.40 GHz, but the base clocks differ: the PRO 5655GE runs at 3.40 GHz, while the 7533HS runs at 3.30 GHz.

The process nodes differ as well. The 7533HS uses a 6 nm process from TSMC, while the PRO 5655GE uses a 7 nm process from the same foundry. Die size and transistor counts are not directly comparable in the available data: the 7533HS lists a die size of 208 mm² with no transistor figure, while the PRO 5655GE lists 180 mm² and 10,700 million transistors.

Cache layouts are similar at the lower levels. Both chips provide 64 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core. The L3 differs slightly in the recorded data: the 7533HS lists 16 MB shared, while the PRO 5655GE lists 16 MB without the shared qualifier. No 3D V-Cache is present on either part.

Memory support splits sharply. The 7533HS uses DDR5 with dual-channel memory and a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The PRO 5655GE uses DDR4 with dual-channel memory and 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is supported only on the PRO 5655GE. PCIe connectivity also differs: the 7533HS offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the PRO 5655GE offers Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

The integrated graphics differ. The 7533HS pairs with Radeon 660M, while the PRO 5655GE uses Radeon Vega 7. Sockets are incompatible: the mobile part uses AMD Socket FP7, the desktop part uses AMD Socket AM4. The 7533HS has part numbers 100-000001632 (FP7) and 100-000001634 (FP7r2), while the PRO 5655GE has part number 100-000001514. Neither chip has an unlocked multiplier.

The 7533HS was released on 2024-08-31 and targets the mobile segment. The PRO 5655GE was released on 2024-05-06 and targets the desktop segment. Both remain in active production.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE has an average benchmark score of 25880, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has an average of 19364.

Q: How large is the performance gap in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The PRO 5655GE scores 15504 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, against 12342 for the 7533HS, a delta of -20.4%.

Q: Does the 7533HS win any benchmark at all?

A: Yes, the 7533HS wins the PassMark physics test with a score of 821, against 648 for the PRO 5655GE, a 26.7% advantage.

Q: What are the memory support differences?

A: The 7533HS supports DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The PRO 5655GE supports DDR4 with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS does not.

Q: How do the two compare in single-thread performance?

A: The PRO 5655GE scores 3240 in PassMark single-thread, against 2740 for the 7533HS, a -15.4% delta. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the PRO 5655GE scores 2188 against 1742, also a -20.4% delta.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Series | 7000 series | 5000 series |

| Base clock | 3.30 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.40 GHz | 4.40 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | AMD Socket AM4 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Zen 3 |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Cezanne |

| Process node | 6 nm | 7 nm |

| Die size | 208 mm² | 180 mm² |

| Transistors | Not listed | 10,700 million |

| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 16 MB |

| Memory support | DDR5 | DDR4 |

| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |

| ECC memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 660M | Radeon Vega 7 |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release date | 2024-08-31 | 2024-05-06 |

| Part number | 100-000001632 (FP7), 100-000001634 (FP7r2) | 100-000001514 |

The Verdict

The recorded data shows a clear overall winner in raw performance: the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE. Its 16 wins out of 17 head-to-head comparisons, its higher average benchmark score of 25880, and its 78th percentile ranking against all CPUs all point in the same direction. The -20.4% deltas across every Cinebench test, and the -24.8% to -28.6% gaps in PassMark compute workloads, indicate a consistent and substantial advantage in CPU-heavy tasks.

The Ryzen 5 7533HS is not without merit. Its PassMark physics win at 26.7% ahead is a genuine result, and its lower 35 W TDP, DDR5 support, and 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth give it architectural advantages that may matter in specific system configurations. Its 73rd percentile ranking is respectable, and its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-8700K and Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, which places it in a competitive mid-range bracket.

For applications that depend on Cinebench-class rendering, data compression, encryption, or general compute throughput, the PRO 5655GE is the stronger choice by a wide margin. For a workload that resembles the PassMark physics test, or for a mobile platform where the 35 W TDP and FP7 socket are required, the 7533HS is the only one of the two that fits. The PRO 5655GE also supports ECC memory and uses the AM4 desktop socket, which may factor into platform decisions. The data does not support a scenario where the 7533HS outperforms the PRO 5655GE outside of the physics test, so any selection between the two should be driven by platform constraints and the specific physics workload rather than general performance expectations.