AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE vs Intel Core i7-14701TE Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: How do the two processors compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core performance?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE scores 17035, which is 9.9% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE’s 15504 in Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Q: Which processor wins in single-threaded PassMark performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE wins by a significant margin, scoring 3240 versus the Intel Core i7-14701TE’s 2637 — a 18.6% advantage for AMD.

Q: What are the integrated graphics options?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE includes UHD Graphics 770, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE comes with Radeon Vega 7.

Q: Do both CPUs support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core i7-14701TE and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE boosts up to 5.20 GHz, notably higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE’s 4.40 GHz boost.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core i7-14701TE is built on Intel’s Raptor Lake-R architecture using a 10 nm process node at Intel’s foundry. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with an L1 cache of 80 KB per core, an L2 cache of 2 MB per core, and a large 33 MB shared L3 cache. The die size is 257 mm². This chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 handles display output without a discrete GPU.

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE uses the Zen 3 architecture (codename Cezanne) fabricated on TSMC’s 7 nm process. It has 6 cores and 12 threads. Cache layout differs significantly: 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and a 16 MB L3 cache. The die size is 180 mm², with 10,700 million transistors. AMD’s chip is limited to DDR4 memory in dual-channel, with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. PCIe support is Gen 3 with 16 lanes. Graphics come from Radeon Vega 7.

Key architectural differences matter for workloads. Intel’s larger L3 cache (33 MB vs 16 MB) and newer PCIe Gen 5 support are advantages for memory-heavy and storage-heavy tasks. AMD’s smaller 7 nm process node and higher transistor density (10,700 million on a smaller die) point to better power efficiency per transistor. The Intel part has a 45 W TDP versus AMD’s 65 W TDP, despite Intel having more cores — a notable efficiency claim for the Raptor Lake design. Both CPUs are unlocked multipliers, but neither offers overclocking flexibility.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14701TE dominates in multi-threaded compute and physics workloads. It wins 10 of the 17 head-to-head benchmarks. The most striking victories are in PassMark physics (187% ahead) and find prime numbers (191.8% ahead). Cinebench multi-core tests across R15, R20, and R23 all show Intel ahead by roughly 9.9-10%. Floating-point math also favors Intel, with a 31.4% lead. The extra two cores and four threads, combined with a larger L3 cache, drive these results.

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE takes 7 benchmark wins, focused on specific single-threaded and encryption workloads. It leads in PassMark single-thread by 18.6% (3240 vs 2637). Data encryption shows a 19.4% advantage for AMD. Extended instructions (8.7% lead), data compression (3.3% lead), integer math (2.6% lead), and random string sorting (4.2% lead) all go to AMD. This suggests AMD’s Zen 3 cores excel in certain integer-heavy and cryptographic operations despite having fewer cores.

For real-world usage, the split is clear: Intel wins heavily in rendering, physics simulation, and prime-number calculations — tasks that scale with cores and multi-threading. AMD wins in single-threaded responsiveness, encryption, and data compression — tasks where per-core IPC and instruction efficiency matter more. The data shows no single CPU is universally faster; the choice depends on workload mix.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i7-14701TE | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE |

|---------------|----------------------|------------------------|

| Cores | 8 | 6 |

| Threads | 16 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 2.10 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 4.40 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 65 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | AMD Socket AM4 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Zen 3 |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 7 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Die Size | 257 mm² | 180 mm² |

| Transistors | Not listed | 10,700 million |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 33 MB (shared) | 16 MB |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4 |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not listed | 51.2 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes | Gen 3, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon Vega 7 |

| Release Date | 2024-06-30 | 2024-05-06 |

The Intel chip has a higher boost clock (5.20 vs 4.40 GHz), more L3 cache (33 MB vs 16 MB), and supports newer memory standards (DDR4 and DDR5). AMD counters with a higher base clock (3.40 vs 2.10 GHz), a smaller process node (7 nm vs 10 nm), and a listed memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. Intel’s TDP is lower (45 W vs 65 W) despite more cores. The sockets differ entirely, meaning platform choice determines which CPU you can use.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench suite shows a consistent pattern. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, Intel scores 1716 versus AMD’s 1562 — a 9.9% lead. Single-core R15 gives Intel 242 versus 220, a 10% advantage. R20 multi-core shows 7154 versus 6511 (9.9% lead), and R20 single-core shows 1010 versus 918 (10% lead). R23 multi-core continues the trend: 17035 versus 15504 (9.9% lead), with R23 single-core at 2405 versus 2188 (9.9% lead). These are not marginal differences; Intel holds a near-uniform 10% edge across all Cinebench versions.

PassMark tells a more varied story. Intel wins floating-point math decisively: 50219 versus 38204, a 31.4% advantage. Find prime numbers is Intel’s biggest win at 191.8% (143 vs 49), and physics shows 187% (1860 vs 648). Multithread score goes to Intel at 20042 versus 18057 (11% lead). However, AMD strikes back in single-thread: 3240 versus 2637, which is an 18.6% lead. Data encryption favors AMD 14509 versus 11699 (19.4% lead). Extended instructions go AMD’s way (15714 vs 14354, 8.7% lead), as does data compression (228037 vs 220520, 3.3% lead). Integer math and random string sorting are closer — AMD wins both by 2.6% and 4.2% respectively.

The average benchmark scores place the two CPUs nearly level: Intel at 26013 and AMD at 25880, a 0.5% difference. Both sit at the 78th percentile among all CPUs. Intel’s nearest rivals include AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (0.1% ahead) and AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS (0.4% behind). AMD’s nearest rivals include Intel Core i7-11700K (0.3% ahead) and AMD Ryzen 5 230 (0.4% ahead). These numbers reinforce that the head-to-head is close overall, with workload-specific swings.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear split. Pick the Intel Core i7-14701TE if your work involves rendering, physics simulation, floating-point math, or heavily multi-threaded tasks. Intel’s 10% Cinebench lead across all versions, combined with a 31.4% advantage in floating-point and a 187% lead in physics, makes it the stronger compute engine. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration with 33 MB L3 cache and PCIe Gen 5 support gives it a platform advantage for modern workloads. Its lower 45 W TDP also means less heat and power draw for more performance in threaded tasks.

Choose the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE for single-threaded responsiveness and specific integer workloads. The 18.6% single-thread PassMark lead is substantial, and wins in encryption (19.4%), extended instructions (8.7%), data compression (3.3%), and integer math (2.6%) show Zen 3’s per-core efficiency. The 7 nm process and 3.40 GHz base clock make it a capable option for everyday tasks and security-sensitive applications. However, its 65 W TDP and 6-core limit hold it back in multi-threaded scenarios, where it trails Intel by roughly 10% consistently.

Both CPUs sit at the same 78th percentile and have nearly identical average benchmark scores (26013 vs 25880). The difference is not overall speed but where that speed manifests. Intel’s wins are larger in magnitude (multiple 10%+ leads, two near-200% blowouts), while AMD’s wins are more concentrated in single-thread and integer tasks. For a balanced system handling varied workloads, Intel’s broader multi-core dominance carries more weight. For a system prioritizing single-thread snappiness and encryption throughput, AMD’s strengths matter more. The socket choice — Intel Socket 1700 versus AMD Socket AM4 — will likely decide many builds before benchmarks even come into play.