AMD Ryzen 5 220 vs AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data shows a decisive performance gap between the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185. Across all 11 head-to-head comparisons, the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 takes the win, with the Ryzen 5 220 recording zero victories. The margins are substantial in almost every workload category, making this less of a close contest and more of a clear tier separation.

The largest single-core advantage for the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 appears in the PassMark single-thread test, where it scores 3,977 against the Ryzen 5 220's 3,646. That represents an 8.3% lead, the narrowest gap in the entire comparison. This indicates that while the embedded part has a superior architecture, the per-core clock speed advantage is modest rather than overwhelming.

Multi-threaded workloads tell a very different story. In PassMark multithread, the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 delivers 31,817 versus 18,582 for the Ryzen 5 220, a 41.6% difference. The integer math test shows the largest proportional gap: 117,832 for the embedded part against 57,987, a 50.8% delta. Floating point math follows closely, with 70,587 versus 35,500, a 49.7% margin. These numbers confirm that the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 roughly doubles the throughput of the Ryzen 5 220 in heavy compute workloads.

The prime number finding test, which often reflects raw integer execution efficiency, shows 129 for the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 against 65 for the Ryzen 5 220, a 49.6% deficit for the smaller chip. Data compression also favors the embedded part heavily: 374,429 versus 212,739, a 43.2% gap. Data encryption shows 19,612 versus 12,493, a 36.3% difference. Extended instruction throughput lands at 26,544 versus 15,512, a 41.6% margin. Physics calculations record 1,772 versus 983, a 44.5% gap. Random string sorting completes the sweep at 40,557 versus 25,433, a 37.3% difference.

The average benchmark score places the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the Ryzen 5 220 sits in the 75th percentile. The embedded part averages 62,839 across its benchmark suite, while the Ryzen 5 220 averages 22,289. For context, the Ryzen AI Embedded P185's nearest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, which scores 62,738, a 0.2% delta. The Ryzen 5 220's closest competitor is the Intel Core i7-10700K at 22,230, a 0.3% difference. These positioning figures show that the Ryzen 5 220 competes in the upper-mid range, while the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 operates near the top of the mobile processor hierarchy.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations despite sharing a process node. The AMD Ryzen 5 220 uses the Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename, fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm node. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 uses a hybrid Zen 5 / Zen 5c configuration under the Gorgon Point codename, also on TSMC's 4 nm process. Both parts share the same AMD Socket FP8 and a 28 watt TDP, but the internal design diverges significantly.

Core counts differ by a factor of two. The Ryzen 5 220 provides 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 doubles that to 12 cores and 24 threads. The cache hierarchy also differs. The Ryzen 5 220 allocates 64 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, with 16 MB of shared L3. The Ryzen AI Embedded P185 increases L1 to 80 KB per core, keeps L2 at 1 MB per core, and maintains 16 MB of L3. The die size reflects the additional resources: the Ryzen 5 220 measures 137 mm² with 20,900 million transistors, while the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 spans 233 mm², with transistor count not recorded in the database.

Clock speeds show a tradeoff. The Ryzen 5 220 has a higher base clock at 3.20 GHz, but the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 reaches a higher boost at 5.10 GHz versus 4.90 GHz. The embedded part's 2.00 GHz base clock is notably lower, likely to manage thermals across 12 cores within the same 28 watt envelope.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The Ryzen 5 220 includes a Radeon 740M, while the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 steps up to a Radeon 890M. Memory support expands on the embedded part: it accepts both DDR5 and LPDDR5X, whereas the Ryzen 5 220 lists only DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses with identical 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory support is present on the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 but absent on the Ryzen 5 220. PCIe lanes increase from 14 on the Ryzen 5 220 to 16 on the embedded part, both at Gen 4.

Release timing places the Ryzen 5 220 at January 2025 and the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 at February 2026, roughly a year apart. The Ryzen 5 220 carries part number 100-000001611, while the embedded part's part number is listed as unknown. Neither processor has a recorded launch MSRP, and both have unlocked multipliers disabled.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins in single-core performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 leads in PassMark single-thread testing with 3,977 points against 3,646 for the Ryzen 5 220, an 8.3% advantage.

Q: How large is the multi-core performance gap?

A: In PassMark multithread, the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 31,817 versus 18,582, which is a 41.6% difference. The integer math test shows an even larger 50.8% gap.

Q: Do both processors use the same socket?

A: Yes, both use AMD Socket FP8. They also share a 4 nm TSMC process node and a 28 watt TDP.

Q: What are the core and thread counts?

A: The Ryzen 5 220 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has 12 cores and 24 threads.

Q: Is ECC memory supported?

A: The Ryzen AI Embedded P185 supports ECC memory, while the Ryzen 5 220 does not. Both support dual-channel DDR5, and the embedded part adds LPDDR5X support.

Q: How do these processors compare to their nearest rivals in the database?

A: The Ryzen 5 220 averages 22,289, placing it near the Intel Core i7-10700K at 22,230 (0.3% delta). The Ryzen AI Embedded P185 averages 62,839, near the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX at 62,738 (0.2% delta).

The Verdict

The benchmark data indicates that the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is the stronger processor across every measured workload. It wins all 11 head-to-head comparisons, with single-core margins near 8% and multi-core margins often exceeding 40%. The 12-core design, newer Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture, larger die, and higher boost clock all contribute to this dominance.

The Ryzen 5 220 remains a capable mobile processor in its own right, sitting in the 75th percentile of all CPUs. Its 6-core Zen 4 configuration with a 4.90 GHz boost clock delivers competitive scores for its class, and its smaller die size suggests lower manufacturing complexity. However, the data does not support choosing it over the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 on performance grounds alone.

For workloads that benefit from higher thread counts and newer architecture, the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is the clear choice. The 50.8% lead in integer math and 49.7% lead in floating point math make it particularly suited for compute-heavy embedded applications. The Ryzen 5 220's higher base clock and lower core count may appeal to scenarios where sustained single-core frequency matters more than raw throughput, but the recorded benchmark scores do not show it winning in any tested category.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across most hardware specifications. Core count changes from 6 to 12, threads from 12 to 24. Base clock drops from 3.20 GHz to 2.00 GHz, while boost clock rises from 4.90 GHz to 5.10 GHz. L1 cache per core increases from 64 KB to 80 KB. Die size grows from 137 mm² to 233 mm². Transistor count is recorded for the Ryzen 5 220 at 20,900 million, but is not available for the Ryzen AI Embedded P185.

Architecture shifts from Zen 4 to a Zen 5 / Zen 5c hybrid. Codename moves from Hawk Point to Gorgon Point. Integrated graphics upgrade from Radeon 740M to Radeon 890M. Memory support expands from DDR5 only to DDR5 and LPDDR5X. ECC memory becomes available on the embedded part. PCIe lanes increase from 14 to 16, both Gen 4. Release dates differ, with the Ryzen 5 220 launching in January 2025 and the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 in February 2026. The part number is known for the Ryzen 5 220 (100-000001611) but unknown for the embedded part.

Shared specifications include the AMD Socket FP8, 4 nm TSMC process node, 1 MB L2 per core, 16 MB L3 cache, dual-channel memory bus, 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, 28 watt TDP, and locked multipliers. Both target the mobile market segment and are currently active in production.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 wins in every benchmark category recorded in the database. Its largest advantages appear in integer math (50.8% ahead), floating point math (49.7% ahead), and prime number finding (49.6% ahead). These results make it the appropriate choice for compute-intensive embedded workloads, data processing, encryption, and any task that can utilize 12 cores and 24 threads. Its 93rd percentile ranking and average score of 62,839 place it among the top mobile processors in the database.

The AMD Ryzen 5 220 does not win a single head-to-head benchmark, but its strengths lie in its efficiency profile. It matches the embedded part's 28 watt TDP while using a smaller die (137 mm² versus 233 mm²) and fewer transistors. Its higher base clock of 3.20 GHz may provide more consistent frequency at lower load levels, though the recorded single-thread score trails by 8.3%. The Radeon 740M integrated graphics, while less capable than the Radeon 890M on paper, still provides a complete mobile package for standard computing tasks.

For users prioritizing raw throughput, the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is the only logical choice. For scenarios where die size, transistor count, or a simpler memory configuration matter, the Ryzen 5 220 offers a leaner alternative, but the performance data consistently favors the embedded part.