AMD Ryzen 5 220 vs AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 Comparison

AMD Ryzen 5 220 versus AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174: comparing a mobile processor with a full benchmark record against one with no recorded test scores. The Ryzen 5 220 belongs to the Zen 4 Hawk Point generation, while the P174 carries the Gorgon Point codename and a Zen 5 / Zen 5c hybrid design. Both share the AMD Socket FP8, a 28 watt TDP, and a dual-channel memory bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, yet their performance profiles are fundamentally different.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two processors. The Ryzen 5 220 has an extensive benchmark suite, while the Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no recorded scores in any test. This absence of data for the P174 means the comparison relies entirely on the 220’s measured results and the architectural differences between the two chips.

For the Ryzen 5 220, Cinebench R23 multi-core delivers 15502 points, with a single-core score of 2188. In Geekbench, the multi-core result is 7974 and single-core is 2027. PassMark tests show a multi-thread score of 18582, single-thread performance of 3646, and a data compression score of 212739. The data encryption test reaches 12493, while extended instructions score 15512. Floating point math hits 35500, integer math scores 57987, and find prime numbers returns 65. Random string sorting produces 25433, and the physics test scores 983.

The 220’s average benchmark score sits at 22289, placing it in the 75th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-10700K with an average score of 22230, which is 0.3 percent lower, and the Intel Core i5-13500H at 22468, which is 0.8 percent higher. The Intel Core i7-1270P reaches 22502, 0.9 percent above the 220, while the AMD Ryzen 5 3600X scores 21992, 1.4 percent below. These deltas are small, indicating the 220 performs within a tight band around these competitors.

Because the P174 has zero benchmark entries, its average score is 0 and it sits at the 50th percentile with no nearest rivals listed. This creates a scenario where the 220 is the only chip with measurable performance data, so any statement about comparative speed must remain qualitative.

Architecture Differences

The Ryzen 5 220 uses the Zen 4 architecture on the Hawk Point codename, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The transistor count reaches 20,900 million, and the die size measures 137 mm². Its cache layout includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

The Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses the Gorgon Point codename, with a generation label of Zen 5 / Zen 5c. The architecture field is not specified in the database, but the generation string indicates a mix of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It has 10 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The process node is also 4 nm at TSMC, but the transistor count is not recorded. The die size is significantly larger at 233 mm². Its cache configuration differs: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. The L3 appears to be shared, same as the 220, but the per-core L1 is larger.

Both processors are built on the same 4 nm TSMC node, which suggests similar transistor density. The P174’s larger die likely accommodates the additional cores and the Zen 5 / Zen 5c hybrid layout. The 220’s smaller die with 6 cores reflects a more conventional homogeneous core design. The P174’s mixed core types could allow for better power efficiency under light loads, but the database does not include power or efficiency measurements.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 5 220 has a clear advantage in the only measurable category: actual benchmark results. With a 75th percentile ranking and an average score of 22289, it demonstrates solid multi-threaded and single-threaded performance across Cinebench, Geekbench, and PassMark suites. Its boost clock of 4.90 GHz is close to the P174’s 5.00 GHz, but the 220’s higher base clock of 3.20 GHz versus 2.00 GHz suggests it may sustain higher frequencies under continuous load, though the database does not provide sustained clock measurements.

The Ryzen AI Embedded P174 wins on core and thread count: 10 cores and 20 threads versus 6 cores and 12 threads. This indicates a potential advantage in heavily parallel workloads such as rendering, compilation, or scientific simulation, but without benchmark scores, that advantage cannot be quantified. The P174 also supports LPDDR5X memory in addition to DDR5, while the 220 only lists DDR5. The P174 includes ECC memory support, which the 220 lacks, making it more suitable for error-sensitive embedded or server-like tasks. The P174’s PCIe configuration offers 16 lanes versus the 220’s 14 lanes, providing more connectivity headroom. Its integrated graphics is the Radeon 880M, a newer designation than the 220’s Radeon 740M, though no graphics benchmarks exist for either.

The 220 wins on data availability and proven performance. The P174 wins on raw specifications: more cores, more threads, higher boost clock, larger L1 cache, ECC support, LPDDR5X support, more PCIe lanes, and a newer integrated GPU. The 220’s higher base clock could translate to better responsiveness in lightly threaded tasks, but the P174’s 5.00 GHz boost clock is 0.10 GHz higher, offering a slight theoretical ceiling.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key fields. Core count: the 220 has 6 cores, the P174 has 10. Thread count: 12 versus 20. Base clock: 3.20 GHz versus 2.00 GHz. Boost clock: 4.90 GHz versus 5.00 GHz. Architecture: Zen 4 for the 220, unspecified for the P174, though the generation string says Zen 5 / Zen 5c. Codename: Hawk Point versus Gorgon Point. Generation label: Ryzen 5 (Zen 4, Hawk Point) versus Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c). Die size: 137 mm² versus 233 mm². Transistor count: 20,900 million for the 220, not recorded for the P174.

Cache differs: L1 per core is 64 KB for the 220 and 80 KB for the P174. L2 per core is 1 MB for both. L3 is 16 MB shared for both. Memory support: the 220 lists DDR5 only, the P174 lists DDR5 and LPDDR5X. ECC memory: false for the 220, true for the P174. PCIe lanes: 14 for the 220, 16 for the P174. Integrated graphics: Radeon 740M versus Radeon 880M. Release date: the 220 launched on 2025-01-05, the P174 on 2026-02-28. Part number: the 220 has 100-000001611, the P174 is unknown. Neither has a launch MSRP recorded, and both are active production parts with locked multipliers.

Shared specifications include the AMD Socket FP8, 28 watt TDP, 4 nm process node, TSMC foundry, dual-channel memory bus, and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth. Both are mobile market segments and both are manufactured by AMD.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 220 has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference?

A: The Ryzen AI Embedded P174 boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the Ryzen 5 220 boosts to 4.90 GHz. The base clocks differ more substantially: 2.00 GHz for the P174 versus 3.20 GHz for the 220.

Q: Does the Ryzen 5 220 support ECC memory?

A: No, the Ryzen 5 220 has ECC memory support set to false. The Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports ECC memory.

Q: How do their cache sizes compare?

A: Both have 1 MB of L2 per core and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The L1 cache differs: the 220 has 64 KB per core, the P174 has 80 KB per core.

Q: What are the PCIe lane counts?

A: The Ryzen 5 220 provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only). The Ryzen AI Embedded P174 provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Q: Are there any benchmark scores for the Ryzen AI Embedded P174?

A: No, the database records zero benchmark scores for the P174. Its average benchmark score is 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed. The Ryzen 5 220 has a full set of scores across Cinebench, Geekbench, and PassMark.

The Verdict

The data clearly separates these two processors into different roles. The AMD Ryzen 5 220 is a proven performer with a complete benchmark record. It achieves a 75th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average score of 22289. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-10700K, is only 0.3 percent slower, and the Intel Core i5-13500H is 0.8 percent faster. This places the 220 in a competitive mid-range mobile position, suitable for general productivity, content creation, and moderate multi-threaded workloads. Its higher base clock of 3.20 GHz suggests strong sustained performance in single-threaded tasks, and its 6 cores with 12 threads handle everyday applications comfortably.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 is a specification-driven chip with no recorded measurements. Its 10 cores and 20 threads, combined with a 5.00 GHz boost clock, point toward a design intended for parallel workloads, embedded systems, or AI-adjacent tasks. The ECC memory support and LPDDR5X compatibility reinforce that positioning. The larger 233 mm² die and Zen 5 / Zen 5c hybrid architecture indicate a different performance profile, but the absence of benchmark data means the database cannot confirm any advantage.

For a buyer or system integrator requiring verified performance, the Ryzen 5 220 is the only option with evidence. Its 16 MB L3 cache, 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, and Radeon 740M graphics make it a complete mobile package. For workloads that demand high core counts, ECC reliability, and future embedded use cases, the P174 offers the specifications, but its performance remains unmeasured. The 220 holds a higher percentile ranking at 75 versus 50 for the P174, though that 50th percentile for the P174 comes from a lack of data, not a measured result.

The choice comes down to whether the user trusts specifications alone or requires benchmark confirmation. The Ryzen 5 220 delivers known performance with a 0.3 percent margin over the Intel Core i7-10700K and a 1.4 percent lead over the AMD Ryzen 5 3600X. The P174 offers more cores, more threads, a higher boost clock, and additional features like ECC and LPDDR5X, but its actual speed in the database is zero. For any application where performance must be guaranteed, the 220 is the safe pick. For an embedded system where core count and memory flexibility matter more than measured scores, the P174’s specifications justify consideration.