AMD Ryzen 5 150 vs AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 Comparison

AMD Ryzen 5 150 vs AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174: A Comparative Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 150 and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 are two distinct mobile processors from AMD, each targeting different priorities within the mobile segment. The Ryzen 5 150 is a 6-core, 12-thread part based on the Zen 3+ architecture (codenamed Rembrandt-R), built on a 6 nm process with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.55 GHz. The Ryzen AI Embedded P174 is a 10-core, 20-thread processor utilizing the Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture (codenamed Gorgon Point), fabricated on a 4 nm process with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Both are active production parts for mobile systems, but their benchmark data availability differs significantly. The Ryzen 5 150 has a comprehensive set of PassMark benchmark scores, while the Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This analysis relies on the recorded data for the Ryzen 5 150 and the architectural specifications for both processors.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen 5 150 is the only processor with benchmark scores, so it holds wins across all measured tests. Its average benchmark score is 34,881, placing it in the 84th percentile among all CPUs. The Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits at the 50th percentile, indicating no measured performance data is available for direct comparison. Therefore, in terms of measurable wins, the Ryzen 5 150 wins every category where scores exist.

However, the architectural differences suggest potential strengths for the Ryzen AI Embedded P174 in specific use cases, even without benchmark numbers. The P174 has 10 cores and 20 threads, which is 4 more cores and 8 more threads than the Ryzen 5 150. This higher core and thread count could theoretically favor heavily parallel workloads, such as multi-threaded rendering, scientific computing, or server-style tasks, though the database does not provide scores to confirm this. The P174 also supports ECC memory, a feature absent on the Ryzen 5 150, which indicates a design intent for reliability-critical embedded applications. Its higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz, compared to 4.55 GHz on the Ryzen 5 150, could also suggest a potential advantage in single-threaded or lightly threaded tasks, assuming the thermal and power budgets allow sustained operation at that frequency.

The Ryzen 5 150, with its 3.30 GHz base clock and 4.55 GHz boost clock, has a higher base frequency than the P174's 2.00 GHz. This could lead to better performance in short-duration, frequency-sensitive workloads where the processor does not need to reach maximum boost. Its 35-watt TDP is higher than the P174's 28-watt TDP, which might indicate that the Ryzen 5 150 can sustain higher clocks under load, though the power envelope differences are not directly comparable without thermal and efficiency data. The Ryzen 5 150's integrated Radeon 660M graphics, versus the P174's Radeon 880M, suggests a difference in integrated GPU performance, but no benchmark scores exist for either iGPU to quantify this.

In summary, the Ryzen 5 150 wins all recorded benchmark comparisons because it has data, while the Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no measured scores. The P174's architectural features, such as more cores and ECC support, point to potential wins in multi-threaded and reliability-focused scenarios, but the database does not contain evidence to confirm these hypotheses.

The Verdict

From the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen 5 150 is the clear choice for any user requiring measurable performance, as it is the only processor with benchmark scores. Its average score of 34,881 places it in the 84th percentile, which is a strong position relative to all CPUs in the database. The nearest rivals to the Ryzen 5 150 include the Intel Xeon 6349P with an average score of 34,890 (a 0% difference), the Intel Core 7 253PTE at 34,962 (0.2% faster), the Intel Core i7-13800H at 34,988 (0.3% faster), and the Intel Core i9-12900HX at 35,003 (0.3% faster). These deltas are minimal, indicating that the Ryzen 5 150 is closely competitive with these Intel parts in average benchmark performance.

The Ryzen AI Embedded P174, with no benchmark scores, cannot be recommended based on performance data. Its 50th percentile ranking and zero average score provide no basis for a performance verdict. However, for a specific use case involving embedded applications that require ECC memory, the P174 becomes the only option between the two, as the Ryzen 5 150 does not support ECC. The P174's higher core count (10 versus 6) and threads (20 versus 12) also make it architecturally more suited for parallel workloads, though this is speculative without measured scores.

The data suggests that a user prioritizing immediate, verifiable performance should select the Ryzen 5 150. A user with a requirement for ECC memory or a need for more cores in a low-power envelope (28 watts versus 35 watts) might consider the Ryzen AI Embedded P174, but they would be doing so without any benchmark confirmation of its capabilities. The absence of scores for the P174 is a significant gap, and the verdict must reflect that the Ryzen 5 150 is the only processor with demonstrated performance in the database.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Since the head-to-head benchmark list is empty and the Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no benchmark scores, a direct comparison of specific tests is impossible. However, the Ryzen 5 150's individual PassMark scores provide a detailed view of its performance across various workloads. These scores are as follows:

• Data compression: 211,289
• Data encryption: 13,425
• Extended instructions: 14,675
• Find prime numbers: 47
• Floating point math: 35,118
• Integer math: 62,151
• Multithread: 17,492
• Physics: 806
• Random string sorting: 22,382
• Single thread: 3,155 (also recorded as singlethread: 3,155)

These scores show a processor that excels in data compression (211,289) and integer math (62,151), indicating strength in tasks that involve heavy arithmetic and data handling. The floating point math score of 35,118 is also substantial, suggesting capable performance in scientific or graphics-related computations. The multithread score of 17,492 is moderate, reflecting the 6-core, 12-thread configuration. The single-thread score of 3,155 is relatively lower, which might be attributable to the 3.30 GHz base clock and 4.55 GHz boost clock, though these are not extreme frequencies.

The Ryzen AI Embedded P174, with no scores, cannot be compared. The nearest rivals for the Ryzen 5 150 provide context: the Intel Xeon 6349P (average score 34,890, 0% delta), Intel Core 7 253PTE (34,962, -0.2%), Intel Core i7-13800H (34,988, -0.3%), and Intel Core i9-12900HX (35,003, -0.3%). These deltas are all within 0.3% of the Ryzen 5 150's average score, meaning the Ryzen 5 150 is essentially tied with these processors in overall benchmark performance. The differences are so small that they fall within typical measurement noise, so the Ryzen 5 150 can be considered performance-equivalent to these Intel parts in aggregate.

The largest recorded win for the Ryzen 5 150 is in data compression, where it scores 211,289, a figure that dwarfs its other scores. This suggests a specific strength in compression algorithms, possibly due to the Zen 3+ architecture's instruction set or cache design. The lowest score is in find prime numbers at 47, which is a very low number compared to other tests, indicating that this workload is not a strong suit for the processor.

Without P174 scores, the head-to-head analysis is one-sided. The data confirms that the Ryzen 5 150 has measurable performance, while the P174 remains unquantified. Any assertion about P174 performance would be speculation, which the database does not support.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 150 has an average benchmark score of 34,881, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has an average benchmark score of 0, as no benchmark scores are recorded for it.

Q: How do the core and thread counts differ between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 150 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 10 cores and 20 threads.

Q: What is the difference in memory support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 150 supports DDR5 memory only, with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s and no ECC support. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC memory support.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 150's boost clock of 4.55 GHz.

Q: What are the process nodes for these processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 150 is built on a 6 nm process, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 is built on a 4 nm process, both by TSMC.

Q: Is there a difference in integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 5 150 uses Radeon 660M integrated graphics, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses Radeon 880M integrated graphics.

Architecture Differences

The two processors differ significantly in their underlying architectures. The AMD Ryzen 5 150 uses the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, and is part of the Ryzen 5 generation. Its process node is 6 nm, produced by TSMC, with a die size of 210 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and it does not support ECC memory. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics are Radeon 660M. The socket is AMD Socket FP7.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses the Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture, codenamed Gorgon Point, and is part of the Ryzen AI Embedded generation. Its process node is 4 nm, also by TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache (noted as shared, though the pack specifies "16 MB" for L3). It supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and it supports ECC memory. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics are Radeon 880M. The socket is AMD Socket FP8.

These architectural differences imply different design goals. The Zen 3+ architecture is a mature design focused on efficiency and mobile performance, while Zen 5 / Zen 5c represents a newer generation with a smaller process node (4 nm versus 6 nm), which typically allows for higher transistor density and improved power efficiency. The larger L1 cache (80 KB versus 64 KB per core) and L2 cache (1 MB versus 512 KB per core) on the P174 could benefit workloads with high cache utilization, though this is not directly measurable from the data. The P174's larger die size (233 mm² versus 210 mm²) might accommodate the extra cores and cache.

The P174's support for ECC memory is a notable architectural feature for embedded systems where data integrity is critical. The Ryzen 5 150 lacks this feature. The PCIe lane count differs: 20 lanes on the Ryzen 5 150 versus 16 lanes on the P174, which could affect expandability for discrete GPUs or other peripherals.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The core count is 6 for the Ryzen 5 150 and 10 for the Ryzen AI Embedded P174, with corresponding thread counts of 12 and 20. Base clock speeds are 3.30 GHz for the Ryzen 5 150 and 2.00 GHz for the P174, while boost clocks are 4.55 GHz and 5.00 GHz respectively. The TDP is 35 watts for the Ryzen 5 150 and 28 watts for the P174. The sockets differ: AMD Socket FP7 for the Ryzen 5 150 and AMD Socket FP8 for the P174. The process nodes are 6 nm and 4 nm, and the die sizes are 210 mm² and 233 mm².

Cache specifications vary: L1 cache is 64 KB per core on the Ryzen 5 150 versus 80 KB per core on the P174; L2 cache is 512 KB per core versus 1 MB per core; L3 cache is 16 MB shared on both. Memory support differs: DDR5 only on the Ryzen 5 150, while the P174 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Memory bandwidth is 76.8 GB/s on the Ryzen 5 150 and 89.6 GB/s on the P174. ECC memory is not supported on the Ryzen 5 150 but is supported on the P174. PCIe lanes are 20 (Gen 4) for the Ryzen 5 150 and 16 (Gen 4) for the P174. Integrated graphics are Radeon 660M on the Ryzen 5 150 and Radeon 880M on the P174. The release dates differ: the Ryzen 5 150 was released on 2025-09-30, and the Ryzen AI Embedded P174 was released on 2026-02-28. Neither processor has a launch MSRP, and both have locked multipliers. The part number for the Ryzen 5 150 is 100-000000990(FP7r2), while the P174's part number is listed as unknown.