AMD Ryzen 5 130 vs AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen 5 130 and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185. However, the recorded data for the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 provides a complete benchmark profile, while the Ryzen 5 130 has no benchmark scores listed. This asymmetry in available data means the comparison relies on the P185's measured performance and the architectural specifications of both processors.

The Ryzen AI Embedded P185 delivers an average benchmark score of 62,839 across all tests. This places it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs in the database, indicating that it outperforms approximately 93 percent of recorded processors. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, scores 62,738, a delta of 0.2 percent in favor of the P185. The Intel Core i7-13790F scores 63,080, which is 0.4 percent ahead of the P185. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX scores 63,173, 0.5 percent ahead. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 scores 62,498, 0.5 percent behind the P185.

Looking at the individual PassMark tests for the Ryzen AI Embedded P185, the highest recorded score is in data compression at 374,429. The integer math test yields 117,832, while floating point math scores 70,587. Extended instructions score 26,544, and data encryption scores 19,612. The random string sorting test produces 40,557. The multithread score is 31,817, and the single-thread score is 3,977. The find prime numbers test yields 129, and the physics test scores 1,772.

The Ryzen 5 130 lacks any benchmark entries in the database. Its percentile versus all CPUs is 50, which is a neutral position, but this value does not derive from measured performance, as the average benchmark score for the 130 is 0. Without recorded test results, the data cannot confirm any performance advantage or disadvantage for the 130 against the P185 or any other processor. The P185, by contrast, has a full set of measurements.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185?

A: The database records an average benchmark score of 62,839 for the P185.

Q: How does the P185 compare to the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX?

A: The P185 scores 62,839, while the Core Ultra 7 255HX scores 62,738. The P185 is 0.2 percent ahead.

Q: Does the Ryzen 5 130 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the Ryzen 5 130, and its average benchmark score is 0.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of the P185 among all CPUs?

A: The P185 is at the 93rd percentile, meaning it scores higher than 93 percent of all CPUs in the database.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while the Ryzen 5 130 has a boost clock of 4.55 GHz.

Q: What are the thread counts for each processor?

A: The Ryzen 5 130 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has 12 cores and 24 threads.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is the only processor in this comparison with measured performance. Its average benchmark score of 62,839 and 93rd percentile ranking confirm that it operates in the upper tier of CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals, all within 0.5 percent of its score, indicate that the P185 sits in a tightly competitive performance band. The 0.2 percent lead over the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX and the 0.5 percent lead over the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 are small but measurable advantages.

The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has no benchmark data in the database. Its percentile of 50 and average score of 0 are placeholders, not measurements. Any conclusion about its performance relative to the P185 would require data that is not present in the database. For users selecting between these two, the P185 is the only option with verified results, and those results place it well above the median CPU.

The P185 also carries a higher boost clock at 5.10 GHz versus 4.55 GHz, and it has double the cores and threads. These specifications align with its superior benchmark presence, though the absence of 130 scores means no direct performance delta can be calculated.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several recorded specifications. The Ryzen 5 130 uses 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 uses 12 cores and 24 threads. Base clocks differ: 2.90 GHz for the 130 and 2.00 GHz for the P185. Boost clocks are 4.55 GHz and 5.10 GHz, respectively. Both have a TDP of 28 watts.

The socket differs: the 130 uses AMD Socket FP7, while the P185 uses AMD Socket FP8. The process node is 6 nm for the 130 and 4 nm for the P185, both fabricated by TSMC. Die size is 210 mm² for the 130 and 233 mm² for the P185.

Cache configurations differ. The 130 has 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The P185 has 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB L3. Memory support differs: the 130 supports DDR5 only, while the P185 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Memory bandwidth is 76.8 GB/s for the 130 and 89.6 GB/s for the P185. Both support ECC memory and dual-channel memory buses.

PCIe lanes differ: the 130 has Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the P185 has Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ: the 130 uses Radeon 660M, and the P185 uses Radeon 890M. Release dates differ: the 130 was released on September 30, 2025, and the P185 on February 28, 2026. The 130 has a part number of 100-000000992(FP7r2), while the P185 has an unknown part number.

Architecture Differences

The Ryzen 5 130 is based on Zen 3+ architecture with the codename Rembrandt-R. Its generation is listed as Ryzen 5 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt)). The Ryzen AI Embedded P185 uses a different design, with the codename Gorgon Point. Its generation is listed as Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c). The architecture field for the P185 is null in the database, but the generation field confirms the Zen 5 and Zen 5c core mix.

The process node differs: 6 nm for the 130 and 4 nm for the P185, both from TSMC. Transistor counts are not recorded for either processor. The die size is larger for the P185 at 233 mm² versus 210 mm² for the 130.

Cache architecture shows clear differences. The 130 uses 64 KB L1 per core and 512 KB L2 per core, while the P185 uses 80 KB L1 per core and 1 MB L2 per core. Both share 16 MB of L3, but the 130 specifies it as shared while the P185 lists it without the shared qualifier. Neither processor has 3D V-Cache recorded.

The P185 supports LPDDR5X memory in addition to DDR5, which the 130 does not. Memory bandwidth is higher on the P185 at 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s. The integrated graphics differ, with the P185 using the Radeon 890M and the 130 using the Radeon 660M. The P185 also has fewer PCIe lanes at 16 versus 20 for the 130, both at Gen 4.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 wins in every category where recorded data exists. Its benchmark scores cover data compression, encryption, extended instructions, prime number finding, floating point math, integer math, multithread performance, physics, random string sorting, and single-thread performance. The highest score, 374,429 in data compression, indicates a strong showing in workloads that benefit from large dataset manipulation. The integer math score of 117,832 and floating point math score of 70,587 suggest solid compute-heavy performance. The multithread score of 31,817 and single-thread score of 3,977 provide a balanced profile for both parallel and sequential tasks.

The P185 holds a 93rd percentile ranking, placing it ahead of the vast majority of CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals, all within 0.5 percent, show that it competes directly with high-end Intel and AMD parts from recent generations. The 0.2 percent lead over the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX is a narrow but real margin. The 0.5 percent lead over the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 confirms that the P185 sits slightly above a comparable AMD part.

The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has no recorded wins because it has no recorded benchmarks. The database shows no scores, no average, and no rival comparisons for this processor. Its specifications, including 6 cores, 12 threads, and a 4.55 GHz boost clock, are present, but without performance data, no use-case advantage can be established from the database. The 130 does have a higher base clock than the P185 at 2.90 GHz versus 2.00 GHz, and it has more PCIe lanes at 20 versus 16, but these are specification differences, not measured performance wins.

For users analyzing workloads, the P185 demonstrates measured strength across a wide range of PassMark tests. The data compression score of 374,429 is particularly notable, suggesting strong performance in archiving, database, or data-intensive applications. The extended instructions score of 26,544 indicates good support for specialized instruction sets. The physics score of 1,772, while lower in absolute terms, still contributes to the overall 62,839 average. The P185's 24 threads give it a clear advantage in parallel workloads, as shown by its multithread score of 31,817. The single-thread score of 3,977 shows it also handles sequential tasks effectively. The Ryzen 5 130, with no data, cannot be assigned any use-case wins from the database.