AMD Ryzen 3 210 vs AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results show a clear division of labor between these two mobile processors. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS wins 11 of the 17 recorded comparisons, while the AMD Ryzen 3 210 takes 6. The most striking result is in the PassMark single-thread test, where the Ryzen 3 210 scores 3724 against 2740 for the Ryzen 5 7533HS, a 35.9% advantage. This is the largest margin in either direction across the entire comparison set.

The Ryzen 5 7533HS, however, dominates in multi-core and throughput-oriented workloads. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 12342 versus 11198, a 9.3% lead. The same 9.3% delta appears in Cinebench R15 multi-core (1243 vs 1128) and Cinebench R20 multi-core (5183 vs 4703). The single-core Cinebench results tell a different story from PassMark: the Ryzen 5 7533HS leads by 9.1% in R15 (175 vs 159), 9.2% in R20 (731 vs 664), and 9.2% in R23 (1742 vs 1581). This discrepancy between Cinebench and PassMark single-thread measurements suggests the two suites stress different aspects of the core architecture.

In integer math, the Ryzen 5 7533HS pulls ahead by 25.3% (50800 vs 37933), and in floating-point math it leads by 14.9% (27800 vs 23649). Data encryption shows a 19.7% gap in favor of the Ryzen 5 7533HS (10718 vs 8607), while data compression favors it by 9.9% (168692 vs 152017). The PassMark multi-thread score gives the Ryzen 5 7533HS a 6.4% edge (14520 vs 13585).

The Ryzen 3 210 wins the remaining tests. Random string sorting favors it by 10.1% (19454 vs 17669). Extended instructions show a 2.2% lead for the Ryzen 3 210 (11464 vs 11219), and finding prime numbers gives it a 2.1% edge (49 vs 48). The physics test is a dead heat at 821 for both processors. The overall average benchmark score sits at 17321 for the Ryzen 3 210 and 19364 for the Ryzen 5 7533HS, placing them at the 71st and 73rd percentiles of all CPUs respectively.

Architecture Differences

The two chips come from different architectural generations. The Ryzen 3 210 uses Zen 4 on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with the Hawk Point codename. The Ryzen 5 7533HS uses Zen 3+ on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC, with the Rembrandt-R codename. The process node difference is significant: 4 nm versus 6 nm, which typically allows higher clock speeds at similar power draw. The Ryzen 3 210 indeed boosts to 4.70 GHz versus 4.40 GHz for the Ryzen 5 7533HS, and its base clock is 3.00 GHz versus 3.30 GHz for the larger chip.

Core counts differ substantially. The Ryzen 3 210 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads. This explains the multi-core advantages of the Ryzen 5 7533HS in most tests. The cache hierarchy also differs. Both have 64 KB of L1 per core, but the Ryzen 3 210 uses 1 MB of L2 per core while the Ryzen 5 7533HS uses 512 KB per core. The L3 cache is 8 MB shared on the Ryzen 3 210 versus 16 MB shared on the Ryzen 5 7533HS.

The die sizes reflect the architectural gap: the Ryzen 3 210 measures 137 mm² with 20,900 million transistors, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS is larger at 208 mm² (transistor count not recorded). Both use the AMD Socket FP7 and support DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. Memory bandwidth differs: the Ryzen 3 210 reaches 89.6 GB/s, the Ryzen 5 7533HS 76.8 GB/s. PCIe lanes also differ, with the Ryzen 3 210 providing 14 Gen 4 lanes and the Ryzen 5 7533HS providing 20 Gen 4 lanes.

Integrated graphics differentiate the pair. The Ryzen 3 210 carries a Radeon 740M, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS has a Radeon 660M. Neither supports ECC memory, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The Ryzen 3 210 was released on January 5, 2025, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS arrived earlier on August 31, 2024. The Ryzen 5 7533HS belongs to the 7000 series, while the Ryzen 3 210 has no series designation recorded. Both are active production parts in the mobile segment.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more head-to-head benchmark comparisons?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS wins 11 of the 17 recorded tests, while the AMD Ryzen 3 210 wins 6. The Ryzen 5 7533HS also holds the higher average benchmark score at 19364 versus 17321.

Q: How large is the single-thread performance gap between them?

A: The PassMark single-thread test shows the Ryzen 3 210 at 3724 against 2740 for the Ryzen 5 7533HS, a 35.9% advantage. However, Cinebench single-core tests tell the opposite story, with the Ryzen 5 7533HS leading by roughly 9.2% across R15, R20, and R23.

Q: What explains the Ryzen 5 7533HS multi-core dominance?

A: The Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads versus 4 cores and 8 threads on the Ryzen 3 210. It also has 16 MB of shared L3 cache versus 8 MB. These structural advantages show up in integer math (25.3% lead), floating-point math (14.9% lead), and Cinebench multi-core tests (9.3% lead).

Q: Are there any tests where the Ryzen 3 210 wins by a large margin?

A: The Ryzen 3 210 wins PassMark single-thread by 35.9% and random string sorting by 10.1%. It also edges out the Ryzen 5 7533HS in extended instructions (2.2%) and prime number finding (2.1%), while tying in physics.

Q: How do their memory systems compare?

A: Both use dual-channel DDR5, but the Ryzen 3 210 offers 89.6 GB/s bandwidth versus 76.8 GB/s for the Ryzen 5 7533HS. The Ryzen 3 210 also has 1 MB L2 per core versus 512 KB per core on the Ryzen 5 7533HS.

Q: What are the production details for each chip?

A: The Ryzen 3 210 uses Zen 4 on a 4 nm TSMC process with Hawk Point codename. The Ryzen 5 7533HS uses Zen 3+ on a 6 nm TSMC process with Rembrandt-R codename. Both are active mobile parts on Socket FP7.

The Verdict

The data points to two distinct usage profiles. The Ryzen 5 7533HS is the stronger all-around performer for multi-threaded workloads. Its 6-core, 12-thread configuration delivers consistent leads in Cinebench multi-core tests, integer math, floating-point math, encryption, compression, and the overall PassMark multi-thread score. The average benchmark score gap of 2043 points (19364 vs 17321) confirms this chip as the more capable processor for sustained parallel tasks.

The Ryzen 3 210, however, shows surprising strength in specific single-thread scenarios. The 35.9% PassMark single-thread advantage is substantial, and the 10.1% lead in random string sorting suggests good memory latency behavior. Its higher boost clock of 4.70 GHz versus 4.40 GHz and larger L2 cache per core likely contribute to these wins. The 4 nm process node and newer Zen 4 architecture bring efficiency and bandwidth advantages, including higher memory bandwidth at 89.6 GB/s.

The percentile rankings place them close together: 71st for the Ryzen 3 210 and 73rd for the Ryzen 5 7533HS. The Ryzen 3 210 sits within 0.5% of the Intel Core i5-12450H and 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G in average score. The Ryzen 5 7533HS matches the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V exactly, sits 0.2% behind the Intel Core i5-1345U, and 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core i7-8700K. These rival relationships place both chips in the same performance tier despite their different core counts.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen 3 210 | AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS |

|-------|-----------------|---------------------|

| Cores | 4 | 6 |

| Threads | 8 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 3.00 GHz | 3.30 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.70 GHz | 4.40 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 35 W |

| Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 3+ |

| Codename | Hawk Point | Rembrandt-R |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 6 nm |

| Die Size | 137 mm² | 208 mm² |

| Transistors | 20,900 million | Not recorded |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 512 KB per core |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB shared | 16 MB shared |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |

| PCIe Lanes | 14 Gen 4 | 20 Gen 4 |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 740M | Radeon 660M |

| Release Date | 2025-01-05 | 2024-08-31 |

| Part Number | 100-000001612 | 100-000001632(FP7), 100-000001634(FP7r2) |

Fields that match include manufacturer (AMD), socket (AMD Socket FP7), memory support (DDR5), memory bus (dual-channel), ECC support (none for either), market segment (mobile), production status (active), and unlocked multiplier (false for both).

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 5 7533HS wins everywhere that parallel throughput matters. Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multi-core tests all show a 9.3% lead. PassMark integer math shows its largest margin at 25.3%, floating-point math at 14.9%, and data encryption at 19.7%. Data compression and multi-thread scores follow with leads of 9.9% and 6.4% respectively. The Ryzen 5 7533HS also wins all three Cinebench single-core tests by about 9.2%, which contradicts the PassMark single-thread result. This chip is the choice for rendering, compiling, and any workload that scales with core count.

The Ryzen 3 210 wins in specific latency-sensitive and single-thread scenarios. Its 35.9% PassMark single-thread advantage and 10.1% random string sorting lead point to strengths in responsive, low-latency operations. The extended instructions test (2.2% lead) and prime number finding (2.1% lead) are narrow but consistent wins. The physics test ties at 821. The Ryzen 3 210 also brings higher memory bandwidth (89.6 GB/s vs 76.8 GB/s) and a newer 4 nm process, which may benefit power-sensitive mobile designs despite the higher boost clock. For workloads that depend on single-core responsiveness, the Ryzen 3 210 delivers measurable advantages, even though the Ryzen 5 7533HS wins the majority of tests.