AMD Ryzen 3 210 vs Intel Core i5-14501E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen 3 210 and Intel Core i5-14501E occupy different positions in the current CPU landscape, and the recorded data shows a clear split in how they approach performance. The Ryzen 3 210 has a substantial set of benchmark results, while the Core i5-14501E has no recorded benchmark scores in the database at this time. This makes a direct numerical comparison impossible for most workloads, but the available data for the AMD part and the architectural specifications for the Intel part still provide a meaningful basis for analysis.

The Ryzen 3 210 delivers a single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1581, a result that places it at the 71st percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its multi-core Cinebench R23 score reaches 11198, which reflects a 4-core, 8-thread configuration operating at a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. In Cinebench R20, the same processor scores 664 in single-core and 4703 in multi-core, while the older R15 test shows 159 and 1128 respectively. These figures indicate a processor that excels in lightly threaded tasks, where its Zen 4 architecture and high boost clock give it an edge.

The Intel Core i5-14501E, by contrast, has an empty benchmark record. The database lists its percentile as 50, but the average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and the nearest rivals field is empty. This means the data cannot confirm any specific performance advantage for the Intel part in any measured workload. The specifications, however, tell a different story on paper: the Core i5-14501E features 6 cores and 12 threads, a base clock of 3.30 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. It uses the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process from Intel, with a die size of 215 mm² and 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Looking at the AMD processor's nearest rivals, the Ryzen 3 210 sits within a tight cluster. The AMD Ryzen 5 4500 averages 17333 points, just 0.1 percent higher than the Ryzen 3 210's average of 17321. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G scores 17278, putting it 0.2 percent behind. The Intel Core 7 150U averages 17395, a 0.4 percent lead, while the Intel Core i5-12450H scores 17239, trailing by 0.5 percent. These deltas are remarkably small, indicating that the Ryzen 3 210 performs essentially on par with these four processors in aggregate benchmark terms. The data shows that the Ryzen 3 210's performance profile is well balanced against a range of competing parts from both AMD and Intel, despite having fewer cores than some of them.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 3 210 shows its strengths in single-threaded and lightly threaded workloads. Its Cinebench R15 single-core score of 159, R20 single-core of 664, and R23 single-core of 1581 all point to strong per-core performance, a characteristic of the Zen 4 architecture. In PassMark tests, the single-thread score reaches 3724, and the integer math score is 37933. Floating point math scores 23649, while extended instructions reach 11464. The data compression test shows 152017, and data encryption scores 8607. These numbers suggest a processor that handles everyday productivity tasks, web browsing, and office applications with ease, where single-core speed often matters more than raw core count.

The multi-threaded results for the Ryzen 3 210 are respectable for a 4-core part. The PassMark multithread score of 13585 and the physics score of 821 indicate that it can manage moderate parallel workloads. The find prime numbers test scores 49, and random string sorting reaches 19454. These results, combined with the Cinebench multi-core scores, show that the Ryzen 3 210 is not a high-end workstation part, but it does not collapse under parallel load either. The 8 MB of shared L3 cache and 1 MB of L2 per core help maintain reasonable throughput.

The Intel Core i5-14501E has no benchmark data, so the only wins it can claim are structural. It offers 6 cores and 12 threads versus the Ryzen 3 210's 4 cores and 8 threads, which in theory gives it an advantage in heavily threaded applications. Its boost clock of 5.20 GHz is higher than the AMD part's 4.70 GHz, and its 24 MB of shared L3 cache is three times larger. The Intel part also supports ECC memory, which the AMD part does not, and it has PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes compared to the AMD part's Gen 4 with 14 lanes. For users who specifically need ECC memory support or maximum PCIe bandwidth, the Core i5-14501E is the clear choice based solely on specifications.

The Ryzen 3 210, however, has a significant efficiency advantage. Its TDP is 28 watts, while the Intel part is rated at 65 watts. The AMD processor also uses a 4 nm process from TSMC with 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die, whereas the Intel part uses a 10 nm process with a 215 mm² die. This means the Ryzen 3 210 delivers its performance at a fraction of the power envelope, which is a decisive factor for mobile or compact systems. The AMD part also includes Radeon 740M integrated graphics, while the Intel part has UHD Graphics 770, though the database does not provide comparative graphics benchmarks.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear picture: the AMD Ryzen 3 210 is a measurable, benchmarked processor that performs at the 71st percentile overall, while the Intel Core i5-14501E has no recorded performance data at all. For anyone who relies on verified benchmark results, the Ryzen 3 210 is the only option with a proven track record in the database. Its average benchmark score of 17321 places it within a fraction of a percent of several capable rivals, including the Ryzen 5 4500 and the Core 7 150U, which confirms that it punches at or above its class.

For users who prioritize efficiency, the Ryzen 3 210 wins decisively. Its 28-watt TDP makes it suitable for thin-and-light laptops or fanless designs, and its Zen 4 architecture on a 4 nm process delivers strong single-core performance without a large power draw. The Intel part's 65-watt TDP and 10 nm process are less efficient, which matters in mobile contexts or any system where cooling and power budgets are tight.

For users who need raw core count, PCIe Gen 5, or ECC memory, the Core i5-14501E is the only candidate that offers those features. The 6-core, 12-thread configuration and 24 MB of L3 cache give it a theoretical edge in multi-threaded and cache-sensitive workloads, but the database contains no scores to confirm this. The Intel part also targets the desktop segment with Socket 1700, while the AMD part is a mobile processor on Socket FP7, so platform compatibility will dictate which one is even usable in a given build.

The verdict from the recorded data is straightforward: the Ryzen 3 210 is the proven performer, with a full set of benchmark results and a percentile rank that places it above the Intel part's 50th percentile. The Core i5-14501E is a specification sheet with potential, but without measured scores, its performance claims remain unverified. The AMD processor should be the default pick for anyone who values confirmed results and low power consumption. The Intel processor should only be chosen if its specific features, such as ECC support or PCIe Gen 5, are absolute requirements and the user is willing to accept unmeasured performance.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen 3 210's boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

Q: How do the core counts compare between the two?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 210 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 210 has a TDP of 28 watts, whereas the Intel Core i5-14501E has a TDP of 65 watts.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 3 210 does not.

Q: What are the Cinebench R23 scores for the AMD processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 210 scores 1581 in single-core and 11198 in multi-core in Cinebench R23.

Q: Which processor uses a more advanced manufacturing process?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 210 uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel Core i5-14501E uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen 3 210 uses the Zen 4 architecture with the Hawk Point codename, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It integrates 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. The Intel Core i5-14501E uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. Its die size is 215 mm², and the database does not list a transistor count for this part.

The cache hierarchy differs significantly. The AMD processor provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor offers 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This gives the Intel part a substantial advantage in total cache capacity, which can benefit workloads that repeatedly access large datasets.

In terms of memory support, the AMD Ryzen 3 210 supports DDR5 memory only, with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core i5-14501E supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also with a dual-channel bus, but the database does not list a memory bandwidth figure for it. The Intel part also supports ECC memory, while the AMD part does not.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The AMD processor offers PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). This makes the Intel part more suitable for systems that need the latest high-bandwidth storage or graphics interfaces.

The platform sockets are different as well. The AMD Ryzen 3 210 uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile socket, and its market segment is listed as Mobile. The Intel Core i5-14501E uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop socket, and its market segment is Desktop. This means the two processors are not directly interchangeable in any system, and the choice between them is largely determined by the form factor.

Integrated graphics are present on both. The AMD part includes Radeon 740M, while the Intel part includes UHD Graphics 770. The database does not provide comparative graphics benchmark scores, so no performance conclusion can be drawn from these figures.

The release dates also differ. The AMD Ryzen 3 210 was released on January 5, 2025, while the Intel Core i5-14501E was released on June 30, 2024. Both processors are listed as Active in production status, and neither has a recorded launch MSRP in the database. The multiplier is locked on both parts, meaning neither allows unlocked overclocking.