AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 366H Comparison

AMD Ryzen 3 110 and Intel Core Ultra 7 366H occupy opposite ends of the mobile processor spectrum. The Ryzen 3 110 is a compact 4-core part built on a mature 6 nm node, while the Core Ultra 7 366H is a 16-core flagship on Intel's 3 nm process. The recorded data shows a clear performance hierarchy, but the smaller AMD chip retains specific strengths that matter for certain workloads. This analysis breaks down where each processor wins, what the benchmark scores indicate, and who should choose which based strictly on the database measurements.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H wins in nearly every multi-threaded and compute-heavy category. Its 16 cores and 16 threads deliver massive parallel throughput, which shows directly in Cinebench results. The R23 multi-core score of 28477 places it far ahead of the Ryzen 3 110, which has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The AMD processor's lack of benchmark entries means it cannot win any head-to-head comparison in the recorded data. The Intel part also dominates in single-core tests, with an R23 single-core score of 4020 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4043. The Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded scores to compare, so every measured category defaults to the Intel processor.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 does win on efficiency metrics. Its 28 W TDP is slightly higher than the Intel part's 25 W TDP, but the AMD chip uses a 6 nm process from TSMC, while Intel uses its own 3 nm node. The AMD processor also supports ECC memory, which the Intel part does not. For workloads requiring error-correcting memory, the Ryzen 3 110 is the only option between the two. The AMD chip also has a smaller die size at 210 mm², while the Intel die size is not recorded in the database. The Ryzen 3 110 uses DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth, while the Intel part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with 115.2 GB/s bandwidth. The higher memory bandwidth of the Intel processor gives it an edge in memory-sensitive tasks.

The Verdict

The Core Ultra 7 366H is the clear choice for anyone needing maximum compute performance. The database shows it at the 87th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 41263. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (0.1% behind), the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 (0.1% behind), the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X (0.3% ahead), and the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (0.7% behind). This places the 366H in a tight performance cluster with several high-end desktop and mobile parts. For multi-core rendering, video encoding, data compression, or any parallel workload, the 366H delivers results that the Ryzen 3 110 cannot approach, as the AMD part has no recorded benchmarks at all.

The Ryzen 3 110 suits a different use case. Its 4 cores and 8 threads are sufficient for light productivity, basic office work, and general system responsiveness, though the database provides no measured scores to confirm this. The ECC memory support makes it attractive for specific professional or server-adjacent applications where data integrity is critical. The AMD processor also uses the older Zen 3+ architecture on a 6 nm node, which suggests mature driver support and a proven design. However, without any benchmark data, the Ryzen 3 110 cannot be recommended for performance-sensitive tasks. The verdict is straightforward: the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H dominates all measured performance categories, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 offers ECC support and a simpler 4-core layout for users who do not need heavy compute.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries between these two processors. The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H has 17 recorded benchmark scores, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has zero. This makes direct comparison impossible for most metrics. However, the Intel part's scores can be interpreted on their own. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the 366H scores 28477. In R20 multi-core, it scores 11960, and in R15 multi-core, 2870. The single-core progression is 4020 (R23), 1688 (R20), and 405 (R15). These numbers indicate a processor that scales well from 4-core workloads up to 16-core workloads, with the multi-core scores being roughly 7 times higher than single-core scores in R23.

Passmark results for the Intel part show a similar pattern. The multi-thread score is 33429, while single-thread is 4043. Integer math scores 83695, floating-point math 103615, and extended instructions 26901. Data compression reaches 327455, data encryption 25845, and random string sorting 39814. Prime number finding scores 326, and physics simulation scores 2880. These numbers paint a picture of a processor that excels at sustained multi-threaded workloads, with the floating-point and integer math scores being particularly strong. The Ryzen 3 110 has no comparable data, so no delta percentages can be calculated. The nearest rivals for the Intel part show it is well-positioned: it is 0.1% faster than the Core Ultra 7 356H, 0.1% faster than the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440, 0.3% slower than the Ryzen 9 5900X, and 0.7% faster than the Core Ultra X7 358H. These deltas are small, indicating the 366H sits in a very competitive performance tier.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 3 110 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists zero benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen 3 110, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H has 17 recorded scores across Cinebench and Passmark tests.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H has 16 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the highest recorded multi-core score for the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H?

A: The highest multi-core score is 28477 in Cinebench R23. The R20 multi-core score is 11960, and the R15 multi-core score is 2870.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 3 110 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H does not support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a boost clock of 4.30 GHz.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5. The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, built on a 6 nm process from TSMC. This is a mature design with a die size of 210 mm². The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H uses the Panther Lake architecture, built on Intel's 3 nm process. The Intel die size is not recorded in the database. The core counts differ dramatically: the AMD part has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel part has 16 cores and 16 threads. This means the Intel processor uses a different threading model, with one thread per core, while the AMD processor uses simultaneous multithreading with two threads per core.

Cache layouts also differ significantly. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part's larger per-core caches and more than double the L3 cache give it a substantial advantage in workloads that benefit from large data residency. The process node difference is notable: 6 nm for AMD versus 3 nm for Intel. The smaller node typically allows higher transistor density and better power efficiency, though TDP figures are similar (28 W for AMD, 25 W for Intel).

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every specification field. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H has 16 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are 3.00 GHz for AMD and 2.00 GHz for Intel, but the boost clocks are 4.30 GHz and 4.80 GHz, respectively. TDP is 28 W for AMD and 25 W for Intel. The AMD processor uses the AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel processor uses Intel BGA 2540.

Memory support diverges: the AMD part supports DDR5 only, while the Intel part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Memory bandwidth is 76.8 GB/s for AMD and 115.2 GB/s for Intel. ECC memory is supported on AMD but not on Intel. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the AMD processor uses Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, while the Intel processor uses Gen 5 with 12 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics are the Radeon 660M for AMD and Intel Xe3 Graphics for Intel.

Release dates are also different. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a release date of September 30, 2025, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H has a release date of January 4, 2026. The Intel processor is part of the Core Ultra Series 3, while the AMD processor has no series designation. The Intel part's part number is SA4R9Q9EL, and the AMD part's part number is 100-000000549 (FP7r2). Neither processor has a launch MSRP recorded in the database. Both processors are listed as Active in production status, and both have locked multipliers. The Intel processor has a percentile rank of 87 among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 41263, while the AMD processor has a percentile rank of 50 and an average benchmark score of 0 due to missing data.