AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 356H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H. The headToHeadBenchmarks field is empty, and the win tally shows zero for both processors. This absence of direct comparison data means all analysis must rely on the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H's absolute scores and its position among nearest rivals, alongside the architectural specifications of both chips.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H posts substantial multi-core numbers in the Cinebench suite. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score reaches 18,395, while the R20 multi-core result is 12,153 and the R15 multi-core result is 3,055. Single-core results follow a similar pattern: 2,040 in R23, 1,715 in R20, and 303 in R15. These figures place the Ultra 7 356H at the 87th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 41,215.

The nearest rivals for the Ultra 7 356H provide context. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 scores 41,208, a delta of 0%. The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H scores 41,263, which is 0.1% ahead. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X scores 41,376, 0.4% ahead. The Intel Core Ultra X7 358H scores 40,967, which trails by 0.6%. These tight margins show the Ultra 7 356H sits squarely within a competitive cluster of high-end mobile processors.

PassMark tests reinforce the multi-core strength. The multithread score is 33,978, data compression reaches 336,177, and integer math hits 83,111. Floating point math posts 103,128, while extended instructions score 27,898. Find prime numbers returns 327, and random string sorting scores 40,990. Physics simulation scores 2,895, and data encryption reaches 26,345. Single-thread performance in PassMark is 4,072 on both listed single-thread entries.

Since the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmark scores, no direct numeric comparison between the two processors is possible from the database. The Ryzen 3 110 sits at the 50th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of zero, indicating no measured results are on file. Every quantitative statement about relative performance must therefore come from the Ultra 7 356H's own scores and its rival deltas.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H wins in every category where data exists, purely because the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmarks. The database shows the Ultra 7 356H delivering multi-core scores that place it among the top 13% of all processors (87th percentile). Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,395 and PassMark multithread score of 33,978 indicate strong parallel workload handling.

For single-thread tasks, the Ultra 7 356H records a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,040 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4,072. These numbers suggest capable responsiveness for single-threaded applications, though the database provides no rival comparison for this specific processor.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 cannot claim any wins from the recorded data. Its 4 cores and 8 threads, combined with a 3.00 GHz base clock and 4.30 GHz boost clock, suggest a lower-end mobile part, but the absence of benchmark scores means the database cannot verify any performance advantage. The 50th percentile ranking implies it sits at the median of all CPUs, but this is based on no measured scores, so the figure carries limited interpretive weight.

The practical split is therefore one-sided: the Ultra 7 356H has measurable performance across all tested workloads, while the Ryzen 3 110 has none on file. Users seeking quantified performance data from this database will find it exclusively for the Intel part.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge fundamentally in design. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses 4 cores and 8 threads, built on the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename. It belongs to the Ryzen 3 generation and uses a 6 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H uses 16 cores and 16 threads, built on the Panther Lake architecture with the same Panther Lake codename. It belongs to the Core Ultra Series 3 generation and uses a 3 nm process from Intel.

Cache configurations differ sharply. The Ryzen 3 110 has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ultra 7 356H has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has more than double the L3 cache and significantly larger per-core L1 and L2 allocations.

Clock speeds show the Ryzen 3 110 with a 3.00 GHz base and 4.30 GHz boost, while the Ultra 7 356H has a 1.90 GHz base and 4.70 GHz boost. The Intel chip has a lower base clock but a higher boost ceiling. Thermal design points are close: the Ryzen 3 110 is rated at 28 W, the Ultra 7 356H at 25 W. Both target mobile platforms, with the Ryzen 3 110 using AMD Socket FP7 and the Intel part using Intel BGA 2540.

Memory support diverges. The Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 with dual-channel operation and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth, plus ECC memory. The Ultra 7 356H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with dual-channel operation and 115.2 GB/s bandwidth, without ECC. The Intel part has 50% higher memory bandwidth in the recorded specifications.

PCIe capabilities differ by generation and lane count. The Ryzen 3 110 uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The Ultra 7 356H uses PCIe Gen 5 with 12 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics also differ: the Ryzen 3 110 has the Radeon 660M, while the Ultra 7 356H has Intel Xe3 Graphics.

Process nodes and foundries create a notable split. The Ryzen 3 110 uses a 6 nm TSMC process, while the Ultra 7 356H uses a 3 nm Intel process. The Ryzen 3 110 has a die size of 210 mm², while the Intel part has no recorded die size. Transistor counts are unavailable for both.

Release timing also differs. The Ryzen 3 110 has a release date of September 30, 2025, while the Ultra 7 356H has a release date of January 4, 2026. Both are listed as Active in production status. Neither has a recorded launch MSRP, and both have locked multipliers.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H has 16 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 boosts to 4.30 GHz. The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H boosts to 4.70 GHz, which is 0.40 GHz higher.

Q: How do the L3 cache sizes compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H has 18 MB of shared L3 cache, more than double the AMD part.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H does not support ECC memory.

Q: What memory bandwidth does each processor provide?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 provides 76.8 GB/s. The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H provides 115.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has an average benchmark score of 0, with no recorded benchmarks. The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H has an average benchmark score of 41,215.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a clear choice for users who require measured performance. The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H delivers quantified results across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and multiple PassMark tests. Its 87th percentile ranking and average score of 41,215 place it among the top processors in the database, with nearest rivals within 0.6% in either direction.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 offers no measured benchmarks in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking comes with an average score of zero, meaning no performance data supports any claim in its favor. The architectural specifications show a smaller part: 4 cores versus 16, 8 MB L3 versus 18 MB, and 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth versus 115.2 GB/s.

For workloads that stress multi-core performance, the Ultra 7 356H has explicit evidence: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 18,395 and PassMark multithread at 33,978. For single-thread tasks, its R23 single-core score of 2,040 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,072 provide reference points. The Ryzen 3 110 cannot be evaluated on any workload from the database.

The choice rests on data availability. Users seeking a processor with documented benchmark results and high percentile placement should select the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H. Users considering the AMD Ryzen 3 110 must rely on specifications alone, as the database contains no performance measurements for it. The Ultra 7 356H also offers newer process technology (3 nm versus 6 nm), larger caches, higher boost clock, and greater memory bandwidth.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen 3 110 | Intel Core Ultra 7 356H |

|-------|-----------------|------------------------|

| Cores | 4 | 16 |

| Threads | 8 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 3.00 GHz | 1.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.30 GHz | 4.70 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 25 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel BGA 2540 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Panther Lake |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Panther Lake |

| Generation | Ryzen 3 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt)) | Ultra 7 (Panther Lake-H) |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 210 mm² | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB (shared) | 18 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 12 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 660M | Intel Xe3 Graphics |

| Release Date | 2025-09-30 | 2026-01-04 |

| Production Status | Active | Active |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

| Part Number | 100-000000549 (FP7r2) | SA4RGQ9EU |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 41,215 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 50 | 87 |