AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 338H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains no direct head-to-head test results for the AMD Ryzen 3 110 versus the Intel Core Ultra 5 338H. The head-to-head benchmark field is empty, and the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmark scores at all. The Intel Core Ultra 5 338H, by contrast, has a full set of recorded measurements across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and Passmark workloads.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 338H produces an average benchmark score of 33,989. That places it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals confirm the performance tier: the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H averages 34,083, which is 0.3% higher, while the Intel Core i7-12800HX averages 33,875, which is 0.3% lower. The AMD EPYC 4244P sits 0.7% higher at 34,220, and the Intel Xeon 6353P is 0.4% higher at 33,844.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score for the Intel part is 16,331, while its single-core R23 score is 2,044. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core result is 10,213 and the single-core result is 1,441. The Cinebench R15 run shows 2,504 in multi-core and 305 in single-core. Passmark results include 28,717 in multithread, 4,180 in single thread, 84,067 in floating point math, and 64,934 in integer math. Data compression reaches 276,539, data encryption reaches 21,367, extended instructions reach 23,906, and random string sorting reaches 34,082. The physics test records 2,697, and the find prime numbers test records 304.

Because the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm any margin of victory for either chip in a direct comparison. The data does show that the Intel Core Ultra 5 338H is a fully measured processor with strong multi-threaded throughput, while the AMD part remains unmeasured in this database.

Architecture Differences

The two processors use fundamentally different designs. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 is built on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, and belongs to the Ryzen 3 generation. The Intel Core Ultra 5 338H uses the Panther Lake architecture, specifically the Panther Lake-H configuration within the Core Ultra Series 3.

The process nodes differ sharply. AMD uses a 6 nm process from TSMC, while Intel uses a 3 nm process from its own foundry. The AMD die size is 210 mm²; the Intel die size is not recorded.

Core counts are very different. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel Core Ultra 5 338H has 12 cores and 12 threads. That means the Intel chip has triple the core count but does not use simultaneous multithreading, while the AMD chip relies on SMT to reach 8 threads from 4 physical cores.

Cache hierarchies diverge as well. The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The Intel part has 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3. The Intel L3 cache is more than double the AMD L3 cache.

Clock speeds also differ. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a 3.00 GHz base clock and a 4.30 GHz boost clock. The Intel Core Ultra 5 338H has a 1.90 GHz base clock and a 4.70 GHz boost clock. The Intel chip boosts higher but starts from a much lower base frequency.

Memory support is another split. The AMD processor supports DDR5 over a dual-channel bus with 76.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth and includes ECC memory support. The Intel processor supports LPDDR5X over a dual-channel bus with 136.5 GB/s of memory bandwidth and does not support ECC memory. The Intel memory bandwidth is roughly 78% higher.

PCIe connectivity differs by generation and lane count. The AMD chip provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU only. The Intel chip provides Gen 5 with 4 lanes from the CPU only. Integrated graphics also differ: the AMD Ryzen 3 110 carries a Radeon 660M, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 338H carries an Arc B370.

Power targets are close but not identical. The AMD processor has a 28 W TDP, and the Intel processor has a 25 W TDP. Release dates are separated by roughly three months: the AMD part launched on September 30, 2025, and the Intel part launched on January 4, 2026. Both are listed as Active in production status, both target the mobile market segment, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD socket is AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel socket is Intel BGA 2540.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports only one firm conclusion: the Intel Core Ultra 5 338H is a measured, high-performing mobile processor, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no benchmark data in the database. The Intel chip sits in the 84th percentile of all CPUs and averages 33,989, placing it within 0.7% of the AMD EPYC 4244P and within 0.3% of the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H. Those are strong company figures for a mobile chip.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 cannot be compared on benchmark performance because no scores exist for it. The architecture data shows it is a smaller part: 4 cores versus 12, 8 MB of L3 versus 18 MB, and 76.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth versus 136.5 GB/s. The Intel part also uses a more advanced 3 nm process against AMD's 6 nm process.

For buyers who prioritize measured multi-core performance, the Intel Core Ultra 5 338H is the only option with recorded evidence. For buyers who prioritize ECC memory support, the AMD Ryzen 3 110 is the only option with that feature. For buyers who prioritize a higher base clock, the AMD chip starts at 3.00 GHz against Intel's 1.90 GHz. For buyers who prioritize boost clock, the Intel chip reaches 4.70 GHz against AMD's 4.30 GHz. The data does not support a broader verdict beyond those recorded differences.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 3 110 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has an empty benchmark list and an average benchmark score of 0. The Intel Core Ultra 5 338H has 17 recorded benchmark scores.

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the Intel Core Ultra 5 338H?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 338H averages 33,989, which places it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 338H compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 165H scores 34,083, which is 0.3% higher. The Intel Core i7-12800HX scores 33,875, which is 0.3% lower. The Intel Xeon 6353P scores 33,844, which is 0.4% lower. The AMD EPYC 4244P scores 34,220, which is 0.7% higher.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 338H has 12 cores and 12 threads. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core Ultra 5 338H does not support ECC memory.

Q: What are the memory bandwidth figures for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 76.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth with DDR5 support. The Intel Core Ultra 5 338H has 136.5 GB/s of memory bandwidth with LPDDR5X support.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 5 338H wins in every measured performance category because it is the only part with recorded scores. Its 16,331 Cinebench R23 multi-core result and 2,044 single-core result define its position. The 28,717 Passmark multithread score and 4,180 single-thread score reinforce the same picture. The 84th percentile ranking confirms that this is a high-tier mobile processor. The architecture also favors the Intel part in core count, L3 cache size, process node, boost clock, memory bandwidth, and PCIe generation.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 wins in several recorded specification categories. It has a higher base clock at 3.00 GHz versus 1.90 GHz. It has ECC memory support, which the Intel part lacks. It has more PCIe lanes at 20 versus 4, though at Gen 4 rather than Gen 5. It has a lower process node disadvantage in terms of die size visibility, with a recorded die size of 210 mm² versus no recorded die size for Intel. It also uses DDR5 memory rather than LPDDR5X, which may matter for systems requiring standard DDR5 modules.

The TDP figures are close, with AMD at 28 W and Intel at 25 W. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not a differentiator. Both are mobile-market parts with active production status.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every major specification field. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 338H uses 12 cores and 12 threads. The AMD base clock is 3.00 GHz; the Intel base clock is 1.90 GHz. The AMD boost clock is 4.30 GHz; the Intel boost clock is 4.70 GHz. TDP is 28 W for AMD and 25 W for Intel.

The AMD socket is AMD Socket FP7; the Intel socket is Intel BGA 2540. The AMD architecture is Zen 3+ with the Rembrandt-R codename; the Intel architecture is Panther Lake with the Panther Lake-H codename. The AMD process node is 6 nm from TSMC; the Intel process node is 3 nm from Intel. The AMD die size is 210 mm²; the Intel die size is not recorded.

Cache configurations differ across all levels. AMD has 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3. Intel has 192 KB L1 per core, 2.5 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB shared L3. Memory support is DDR5 for AMD and LPDDR5X for Intel, both dual-channel. Memory bandwidth is 76.8 GB/s for AMD and 136.5 GB/s for Intel. ECC memory is supported on AMD only.

PCIe is Gen 4 with 20 lanes for AMD and Gen 5 with 4 lanes for Intel, both CPU-only. Integrated graphics are Radeon 660M for AMD and Arc B370 for Intel. The AMD part number is 100-000000549(FP7r2); the Intel part number is SA4REQ9EW. Release dates are September 30, 2025, for AMD and January 4, 2026, for Intel. Neither part has a launch MSRP recorded, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.