AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core i9-14901TE Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the core counts and thread counts differ between the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the Intel Core i9-14901TE?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core i9-14901TE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel part doubles the core count and thread count of the AMD part.

Q: What are the base and boost clock speeds for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The Intel Core i9-14901TE has a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The Intel processor has a significantly higher boost clock, while the AMD processor has a higher base clock.

Q: Which processor has the larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901TE has a shared L3 cache of 36 MB, whereas the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a shared L3 cache of 8 MB. The Intel processor offers 4.5 times the L3 cache capacity.

Q: What is the process node and foundry for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i9-14901TE is built on a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD node is smaller in process dimension.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the Intel Core i9-14901TE list ECC memory support as enabled.

Q: What memory types are supported by each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 memory. The Intel Core i9-14901TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the Intel Core i9-14901TE represent fundamentally different design approaches. The AMD chip uses the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, and is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel chip uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, and is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The AMD die size is 210 mm², while the Intel die is larger at 257 mm².

The core topology differs substantially. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 is a 4-core, 8-thread part with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The Intel Core i9-14901TE is an 8-core, 16-thread part with a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The Intel chip has a lower base frequency but a much higher maximum boost, giving it a wider operating range.

Cache hierarchies diverge sharply. The AMD processor provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3. The Intel part's L2 cache is 4 times larger per core, and its L3 pool is 4.5 times larger overall. This disparity suggests the Intel design can hold significantly more working data closer to the cores.

Memory support also differs. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel Core i9-14901TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, though no memory bandwidth figure is recorded for it. Both processors enable ECC memory. PCIe capability differs as well: the AMD part provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, while the Intel part provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The Intel chip offers a newer PCIe standard, while the AMD chip offers more lanes.

Integrated graphics differ between the two. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 includes a Radeon 660M, while the Intel Core i9-14901TE includes UHD Graphics 770. The market segments are distinct, with the AMD part classified as Mobile and the Intel part classified as Desktop. Sockets are not interchangeable: the AMD uses AMD Socket FP7, and the Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD release date is recorded as September 30, 2025, while the Intel release date is June 30, 2024. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and both remain in active production status.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data contains no direct head-to-head results between the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the Intel Core i9-14901TE. Both processors have an empty benchmark array, and the head-to-head benchmark list is also empty. The wins count for each side is zero. As such, no measured performance deltas can be cited from direct comparisons.

However, the specification data allows for analytical comparisons of relative capability. The Intel Core i9-14901TE has double the cores and double the threads of the AMD Ryzen 3 110. In multi-threaded workloads that scale with core count, the Intel part would have a structural advantage of 100% more parallel resources. Its boost clock of 5.50 GHz is 1.20 GHz higher than the AMD part's 4.30 GHz boost. Single-threaded performance, which depends heavily on clock speed and architecture efficiency, favors the Intel chip on frequency alone.

The cache hierarchy strongly favors the Intel part. The 36 MB shared L3 cache on the Intel chip is 28 MB larger than the 8 MB pool on the AMD chip. The per-core L2 cache of 2 MB on the Intel part is 1.5 MB larger per core than the 512 KB per core on the AMD part. Larger caches reduce latency for data sets that fit within them, which can improve performance in workloads with moderate working sets or repeated access patterns.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 counters with a higher base clock of 3.00 GHz versus 2.30 GHz on the Intel chip. This means at idle or low-load states, the AMD part runs at a higher frequency before boosting. The AMD part also uses a smaller 6 nm process, which typically correlates with better power efficiency per transistor. The AMD chip has a TDP of 28 watts versus 45 watts for the Intel chip, indicating a lower thermal envelope.

Memory bandwidth is a differentiating factor in favor of the AMD part. The recorded 76.8 GB/s for the AMD Ryzen 3 110 exceeds the unrecorded value for the Intel chip. While the Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5, the AMD chip is DDR5-only, which simplifies memory topology but limits upgrade flexibility.

Both processors sit at the 50th percentile among all CPUs in the database, indicating that neither is positioned as an extreme outlier in overall capability. With no average benchmark scores recorded for either, the percentile ranking serves as the primary comparative metric. The parity in percentile suggests that despite the core count and clock differences, the overall performance class of the two parts is similar in the database's aggregate view.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Intel Core i9-14901TE is structurally stronger for parallel throughput. It has 8 cores, 16 threads, a 5.50 GHz boost clock, and a 36 MB L3 cache. These specifications point to a processor that would handle multi-threaded rendering, compilation, or server-side workloads with more headroom. The 45 watt TDP reflects a higher power allowance for sustained operation.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 is a lower-power part at 28 watts TDP. It has 4 cores, 8 threads, a 4.30 GHz boost clock, and an 8 MB L3 cache. Its strengths lie in a higher base clock of 3.00 GHz, a smaller 6 nm process, and a higher recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. This chip appears suited for scenarios where power draw is constrained and where DDR5 memory bandwidth is a priority.

The market segments reinforce the intended use cases. The AMD part is classified as Mobile, targeting portable systems where thermal and power limits are strict. The Intel part is classified as Desktop, targeting stationary systems where a 45 watt envelope and larger cooling solutions are acceptable.

The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering more memory flexibility. The AMD chip supports only DDR5, which is faster but less flexible. The Intel chip provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, while the AMD chip provides PCIe Gen 4 with more lanes. The choice between them depends on whether the workload favors core count and clock headroom (Intel) or power efficiency and memory bandwidth (AMD).

Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, limiting overclocking options for both. Both are in active production. The Intel part launched earlier in June 2024, while the AMD part launched later in September 2025.

For users prioritizing high core counts, large cache, and high boost frequencies, the Intel Core i9-14901TE is the clear choice from the recorded data. For users prioritizing lower power draw, a higher base clock, and higher memory bandwidth, the AMD Ryzen 3 110 offers distinct advantages. The parity in percentile ranking suggests that neither part dominates the other in a general sense, so the correct selection depends on workload characteristics and platform constraints.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 110 | Intel Core i9-14901TE |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 4 | 8 |

| Threads | 8 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 3.00 GHz | 2.30 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.30 GHz | 5.50 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen 3 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt)) | Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 210 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB (shared) | 36 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | Yes | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 660M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | September 30, 2025 | June 30, 2024 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

| Part Number | 100-000000549 (FP7r2) | Q49CSRNJJ |