AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core i9-14901E Comparison

The Verdict

The recorded data positions these two processors in entirely different segments. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 is a mobile-oriented, 4-core/8-thread chip with a 28 W TDP, built for efficiency and compact systems. The Intel Core i9-14901E is a desktop-class, 8-core/16-thread processor with a 65 W TDP, designed for sustained multi-threaded workloads. Benchmark results are only available for the Intel chip, which holds an 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs and an average benchmark score of 37,911. The AMD part has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile. For any workload that benefits from more cores, higher boost clocks, or larger caches, the data points squarely to the Intel Core i9-14901E. The AMD Ryzen 3 110, lacking recorded measurements, cannot be positioned as a performance alternative based on the database contents.

Architecture Differences

The two chips come from different design philosophies and process nodes. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses the Zen 3+ architecture on the Rembrandt-R codename, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It is a 4-core, 8-thread part with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The thermal design power is 28 W, reflecting its mobile intent. The cache layout includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. Memory support covers DDR5 over a dual-channel bus with a measured bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. ECC memory is supported. The integrated graphics are Radeon 660M. The socket is AMD Socket FP7, and the chip carries a part number of 100-000000549 (FP7r2). It is listed as active production, released on September 30, 2025, and has a die size of 210 mm².

The Intel Core i9-14901E belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, built on Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel. The core configuration doubles the AMD part: 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clock is 2.80 GHz, boost clock reaches 5.60 GHz, and TDP is 65 W. The cache hierarchy is substantially larger: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus; no bandwidth figure is recorded. ECC memory is supported. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, and the part number is Q49ESRNJH. It was released on June 30, 2024, and is also marked as active production, with a die size of 257 mm².

Process node differences alone do not determine performance, but the Intel chip's larger core count, higher boost clock, and much larger L3 cache (36 MB versus 8 MB) indicate a clear design intent for heavier compute loads. The AMD part's lower TDP and smaller die size suggest a focus on power-constrained or compact deployments.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries comparing these two specific processors. However, the Intel Core i9-14901E has a full suite of recorded results. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmark scores at all. This asymmetry means a direct numerical comparison cannot be constructed from the measured data.

For the Intel chip, the recorded Cinebench results show strong multi-threaded capability. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2,595 in multi-core and 366 in single-core. Cinebench R20 shows 10,816 multi-core and 1,526 single-core. Cinebench R23 delivers 25,753 multi-core and 3,635 single-core. These results place it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, with an average score of 37,911. Its nearest rivals in the database are the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 at 37,904 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X at 37,943 (-0.1% delta), the Intel Core 5 211E at 37,829 (0.2% delta), and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 at 37,804 (0.3% delta). The Intel chip effectively sits in a tight cluster with these parts, within a 0.3% band of average score differences.

PassMark results for the Intel chip reinforce its multi-threaded orientation. Integer math scores 112,736, floating point math scores 81,089, and multithread scores 30,298. Data compression reaches 288,777, while data encryption scores 18,571. Extended instructions score 17,249, physics scores 3,041, and random string sorting scores 39,138. Single-thread PassMark scores are recorded twice, both at 4,354. The find prime numbers test scores 189. These figures confirm a processor that handles parallel workloads with ease, though the single-thread results are comparatively modest relative to its multi-core output.

Since the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has zero recorded benchmarks, the database offers no evidence of its performance level. Any claim about its speed relative to the Intel chip would be unsupported.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E has 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds for each chip?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E boosts to 5.60 GHz. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 boosts to 4.30 GHz.

Q: Which processor has the larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E has 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 8 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 3 110 have any recorded benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen 3 110. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-14901E compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E has an average score of 37,911. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, scores 37,904 with a 0% delta. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X scores 37,943 with a -0.1% delta. The Intel Core 5 211E scores 37,829 with a 0.2% delta, and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37,804 with a 0.3% delta.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 only, over a dual-channel bus with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core i9-14901E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus; no bandwidth figure is recorded.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i9-14901E wins in every category where measured data exists. It offers double the core count and thread count, a higher boost clock by 1.30 GHz, and a significantly larger L3 cache. Its benchmark results, particularly in Cinebench R23 multi-core at 25,753 and PassMark multithread at 30,298, indicate strong performance in parallel workloads such as video rendering, scientific computation, and software compilation. The 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms its position in the upper tier of the database's collected processors. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.3% of its average score, meaning it trades places with several high-end chips depending on the specific workload.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores. The database cannot demonstrate any performance win for this chip. Its advantages are structural rather than measured: a lower TDP of 28 W versus 65 W, a 6 nm process node versus 10 nm, and a smaller die size of 210 mm² versus 257 mm². These characteristics point to a processor suited for power-sensitive or space-constrained systems, where heat output and energy draw matter more than raw compute throughput. The Radeon 660M integrated graphics and DDR5-only memory support also indicate a modern mobile platform, though no performance data validates its capabilities.

For users selecting between these two based on the database, the choice is clear. The Intel Core i9-14901E is the only one with evidence of performance, and that evidence shows a high-end desktop part. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 remains an unmeasured quantity, useful only in scenarios where its efficiency profile is the primary consideration. No benchmark win can be attributed to the AMD chip, because none are recorded. The data supports the Intel part for any compute-intensive task, while the AMD part's role is defined by its power envelope and platform features, not by measured speed.