AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core i5-14490F Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 and Intel Core i5-14490F occupy very different positions in the database. The Ryzen 3 110 is a mobile processor with 4 cores and 8 threads, built on TSMC's 6 nm process under the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R. The Core i5-14490F is a desktop part with 10 cores and 16 threads, using Intel's 10 nm process, Raptor Lake architecture, and the Raptor Lake-R codename. The database shows no head-to-head benchmark entries for this pair, and the Ryzen 3 110 carries no recorded benchmark scores at all. The Core i5-14490F, by contrast, has an extensive benchmark record. This asymmetry shapes the entire analysis: the comparison must rely on the Core i5-14490F's measured results and the architectural differences between the two, rather than direct competitive tests.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Since the database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries between the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the Intel Core i5-14490F, the comparison defaults to the only recorded measurements available. The Core i5-14490F has 17 benchmark scores across Cinebench and Passmark suites. The Ryzen 3 110 has zero benchmark scores in the database, meaning no direct numerical comparison can be performed. The data instead shows what the Core i5-14490F delivers in isolation, and the Ryzen 3 110's absence of scores leaves its performance unquantified.

The Core i5-14490F's Cinebench results show a multi-core advantage typical of a 10-core, 16-thread processor. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, it scores 2318, while its single-core score in the same test is 327. This creates a multi-to-single ratio of approximately 7.1:1, indicating strong scaling across its cores. Cinebench R20 multi-core produces 9660, with single-core at 1363, a ratio of about 7.1:1 as well. Cinebench R23 multi-core reaches 23000, and single-core hits 3247, again a ratio near 7.1:1. These consistent ratios suggest the processor maintains its multi-threaded efficiency across different Cinebench versions.

Passmark results for the Core i5-14490F show varied workloads. Integer math scores 87844, floating point math scores 66558, and extended instructions scores 21731. Data compression hits 340026, while data encryption reaches 18225. Random string sorting produces 35608. The find prime numbers test scores just 122, a notably low figure compared to the other integer-based tests. Physics scores 2093. The multithread score is 28662, and single-thread scores are recorded as 3873 in two separate entries, one labeled passmark_single_thread and the other passmark_singlethread, both identical.

The average benchmark score for the Core i5-14490F is 38149, placing it in the 86th percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals confirm its position. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T averages 38194, a delta of -0.1% relative to the Core i5-14490F, meaning the Core i5-14490F sits essentially level with that chip. The Intel Core i5-13600KF averages 38103, a delta of +0.1%, again nearly identical. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 averages 38221, a delta of -0.2%, and the Intel Core i5-13600HX averages 38261, a delta of -0.3%. These deltas indicate that the Core i5-14490F's average score lies within a narrow band of less than one percent of each rival's average, making all four chips statistically equivalent in the database's aggregate metric.

The Ryzen 3 110 has no such data. Its percentile versus all CPUs is listed as 50, exactly the median, but without an average benchmark score or any benchmark entries, this percentile cannot be verified against measured results. The database records zero wins for the Ryzen 3 110 and zero wins for the Core i5-14490F in head-to-head tests, since no such tests exist. What the data does show is that the Core i5-14490F has a complete performance profile, while the Ryzen 3 110 does not.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the recorded data, the Intel Core i5-14490F is the only processor in this comparison with measurable performance. Its 86th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 38149 place it firmly among mid-to-high performing desktop CPUs. The Ryzen 3 110's lack of benchmark scores means the database cannot support any performance claim for it. A user selecting between these two would find that the Core i5-14490F offers documented multi-core and single-core results, while the Ryzen 3 110 offers none.

The Core i5-14490F's nearest rivals underscore its position. With deltas of -0.1%, +0.1%, -0.2%, and -0.3% against the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, Intel Core i5-13600KF, AMD Ryzen 7 250, and Intel Core i5-13600HX respectively, the Core i5-14490F sits in a cluster of nearly identical average scores. This suggests that among this set of processors, the Core i5-14490F is neither ahead nor behind in any meaningful way; the differences are fractions of a percent. The data implies that any of these four rivals would deliver equivalent aggregate performance.

For the Ryzen 3 110, the only data points available are architectural. It is a 4-core, 8-thread mobile chip with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, a TDP of 28 watts, and an integrated Radeon 660M GPU. Its 50th percentile ranking is the only performance-related figure, but without benchmark scores, this percentile is unsubstantiated. The verdict from the data is clear: the Core i5-14490F is the only option with proven performance, while the Ryzen 3 110's capabilities remain unmeasured in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The Core i5-14490F wins in every benchmark category where data exists. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23000 indicates strong sustained multi-threaded throughput, useful for rendering, compilation, or other parallel workloads. Its single-core score of 3247 in the same test shows solid per-thread performance. Passmark integer math at 87844 and floating point math at 66558 confirm broad computational strength. Data compression at 340026 is particularly high, suggesting efficient handling of compression algorithms. The multithread score of 28662 reinforces the multi-core capability.

The Ryzen 3 110 has no benchmark wins recorded, because no benchmark scores are recorded at all. Its only possible wins would come from architectural attributes. It supports ECC memory, while the Core i5-14490F does not. It includes integrated graphics (Radeon 660M), while the Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics (listed as N/A). It runs on a 28-watt TDP, far lower than the Core i5-14490F's 65-watt TDP, which could indicate lower power draw in mobile contexts. Its memory bandwidth is listed at 76.8 GB/s, while the Core i5-14490F has no memory bandwidth figure in the database. These are functional differences, not performance wins.

The Core i5-14490F also wins on core count (10 versus 4), thread count (16 versus 8), L3 cache (24 MB shared versus 8 MB shared), and boost clock (5.00 GHz versus 4.30 GHz). It supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the Ryzen 3 110 uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. The Ryzen 3 110 has more PCIe lanes overall, but the Core i5-14490F has a newer generation. The Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 memory only, while the Core i5-14490F supports both DDR4 and DDR5. These specification differences matter for platform compatibility, but they do not translate into measured performance wins for the Ryzen 3 110.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core i5-14490F?

A: The average benchmark score is 38149, placing it in the 86th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 3 110 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Ryzen 3 110 has an empty benchmark list, an average benchmark score of 0, and no recorded performance results.

Q: How does the Core i5-14490F compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core i5-14490F is within 0.3% of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (delta -0.1%), Intel Core i5-13600KF (delta +0.1%), AMD Ryzen 7 250 (delta -0.2%), and Intel Core i5-13600HX (delta -0.3%) in average score.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of the Ryzen 3 110 versus all CPUs?

A: The database lists the Ryzen 3 110 at the 50th percentile, but since it has no benchmark scores, this percentile is not supported by any measured results.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports ECC memory (listed as true), while the Intel Core i5-14490F does not (listed as false).

Q: What are the Cinebench R23 scores for the Core i5-14490F?

A: The Core i5-14490F scores 23000 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3247 in Cinebench R23 single-core.

Architecture Differences

The two processors use fundamentally different architectures. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses Zen 3+, codenamed Rembrandt-R, built on TSMC's 6 nm process. The Intel Core i5-14490F uses Raptor Lake, codenamed Raptor Lake-R, built on Intel's 10 nm process. The Ryzen 3 110 belongs to the Ryzen 3 generation with Zen 3+ (Rembrandt), while the Core i5-14490F belongs to the Core 14th Gen with Raptor Lake Refresh.

The Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. Its cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The Core i5-14490F has 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Its cache is larger: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The Core i5-14490F's die size is 215 mm², while the Ryzen 3 110's die size is 210 mm². The Core i5-14490F has more cores, more threads, more cache, and a higher boost clock, though a lower base clock.

The Ryzen 3 110 integrates a Radeon 660M GPU, making it self-contained for display output. The Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU. The Ryzen 3 110 is a mobile segment part, while the Core i5-14490F is a desktop segment part. The Ryzen 3 110's TDP of 28 watts reflects its mobile targeting, while the Core i5-14490F's 65-watt TDP reflects desktop power envelopes. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so both are locked for overclocking.

The Ryzen 3 110 uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Core i5-14490F uses Intel Socket 1700. The Ryzen 3 110's part number is 100-000000549 (FP7r2), and the Core i5-14490F's part number is SRN35. The Ryzen 3 110 was released on 2025-09-30, while the Core i5-14490F was released on 2023-12-31. Both are listed as Active in production status.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field. Core count: 4 versus 10. Thread count: 8 versus 16. Base clock: 3.00 GHz versus 2.50 GHz. Boost clock: 4.30 GHz versus 5.00 GHz. TDP: 28 watts versus 65 watts. Socket: AMD Socket FP7 versus Intel Socket 1700. Architecture: Zen 3+ versus Raptor Lake. Codename: Rembrandt-R versus Raptor Lake-R. Generation: Ryzen 3 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt)) versus Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh). Process node: 6 nm versus 10 nm. Foundry: TSMC versus Intel. Die size: 210 mm² versus 215 mm².

Cache: L1 per core is 64 KB versus 80 KB. L2 per core is 512 KB versus 1.25 MB. L3 shared is 8 MB versus 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5 versus DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bus is dual-channel for both. Memory bandwidth: 76.8 GB/s for the Ryzen 3 110, no recorded value for the Core i5-14490F. ECC memory: true versus false. PCIe: Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only) versus Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics: Radeon 660M versus N/A. Market segment: Mobile versus Desktop. Release date: 2025-09-30 versus 2023-12-31. Multiplier unlocked: false for both. Production status: Active for both. Launch MSRP: not recorded for either.

The Ryzen 3 110's 28-watt TDP and mobile segment, combined with its integrated Radeon 660M, position it for low-power portable systems. The Core i5-14490F's 65-watt TDP, desktop segment, and lack of integrated graphics position it for traditional desktop builds with discrete GPUs. The Core i5-14490F's PCIe Gen 5 support provides newer interconnect bandwidth for compatible devices, while the Ryzen 3 110's PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes offers more total lanes. The Ryzen 3 110's ECC support and fixed memory bandwidth figure give it features absent from the Core i5-14490F's record, but these do not affect benchmark outcomes since the Core i5-14490F has all the measured performance data.