AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core 9 273PQE Comparison

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 offers 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core 9 273PQE offers 12 cores and 24 threads.

Q: What are the base and boost clock speeds recorded in the database?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The Intel Core 9 273PQE has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.90 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports faster PCIe and what is the lane count?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only).

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses a 6 nm process node from TSMC. The Intel Core 9 273PQE uses a 10 nm process node from Intel.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 memory. The Intel Core 9 273PQE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of each processor in the database?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 sits at the 50th percentile among all CPUs. The Intel Core 9 273PQE sits at the 93rd percentile.

The Verdict

The data separates these two processors clearly by workload class. The Intel Core 9 273PQE dominates every recorded benchmark category, which aligns with its 12 cores, 24 threads, higher clock speeds, and 93rd percentile ranking. The AMD Ryzen 3 110, with 4 cores and 8 threads, holds a 50th percentile ranking and shows no benchmark wins in the head-to-head comparison. The Intel part also carries a launch MSRP of $589, a figure stated once here for reference.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 targets a mobile socket (AMD Socket FP7) with a 28 TDP, indicating a low-power design. The Intel Core 9 273PQE targets a desktop socket (Intel Socket 1700) with a 125 TDP, indicating a high-performance desktop part. Buyers choosing between these should base the decision on platform and power constraints first. If the system requires a low-power mobile processor, the AMD part is the only option in this pair. If the system is a desktop with room for a 125 W processor, the Intel part provides vastly higher multi-threaded throughput, higher single-thread scores, and access to newer PCIe Gen 5 connectivity.

The benchmark gap is not marginal. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel part scores 39190, which is a massive lead over the AMD part's zero-recorded score in that test (the AMD unit has no benchmark entries in the database). The Intel part also posts a single-thread score of 4573 in Passmark, while the AMD part has no recorded Passmark results. The verdict is straightforward: the Intel Core 9 273PQE is the superior performer across all measured workloads, but the AMD Ryzen 3 110 fills a specific low-power mobile niche.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, so the comparison relies on the individual benchmark records. The Intel Core 9 273PQE has 17 recorded benchmark scores; the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has zero recorded scores. This absence of data means the AMD processor cannot be quantified against the Intel part in any direct test.

The Intel Core 9 273PQE delivers strong multi-threaded results across Cinebench versions. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, it scores 3950. In Cinebench R20 multi-core, it scores 16459. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 39190. Single-core scores follow a similar pattern: 557 in R15, 2323 in R20, and 5532 in R23.

Passmark results for the Intel part show consistent strength in integer math (164629), floating-point math (125546), and extended instructions (38743). Data compression scores 585752, data encryption scores 29636, and random string sorting scores 53167. The multithread score is 46107, and the physics score is 2754. Find prime numbers scores 198, and single-thread performance is measured at 4573.

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core 9 273PQE provide context. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus scores 66159, which is 0.1% higher. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 65914, which is 0.3% lower. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus scores 66855, which is 1.1% higher. The AMD EPYC 4465P scores 66925, which is 1.2% higher. These deltas place the Core 9 273PQE within a tight performance cluster, only 1.2% below its closest rival and 0.3% above another.

Since the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no benchmark scores, there are no direct wins to attribute to it. The Intel part wins every category by default of having recorded data.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every core specification. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel Core 9 273PQE uses 12 cores and 24 threads, tripling the core count and doubling the thread count.

Clock speeds differ substantially. The AMD part has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.90 GHz, giving it a 0.40 GHz higher base and a 1.60 GHz higher boost.

Thermal design power also diverges. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a TDP of 28. The Intel Core 9 273PQE has a TDP of 125, a difference of 97 units.

Sockets are incompatible. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP7. The Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700.

Memory support differs. The AMD part supports only DDR5. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth also varies: the AMD part records 76.8 GB/s, while the Intel part records 89.6 GB/s.

PCIe generation and lane counts differ. The AMD part uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Both support dual-channel memory and ECC memory.

Integrated graphics differ. The AMD part includes Radeon 660M. The Intel part includes UHD Graphics 770.

Production status for both is active. Release dates differ: the AMD part released on 2025-09-30, and the Intel part released on 2026-03-08.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the codename Rembrandt-R. It belongs to the Ryzen 3 generation with a process node of 6 nm from TSMC. Its die size is 210 mm². Cache is organized as 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3.

The Intel Core 9 273PQE uses the Bartlett Lake codename under the Core 9 generation. Its architecture field is not recorded in the database. The process node is 10 nm from Intel's own foundry. Cache is organized as 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3. The Intel part has no recorded die size.

The cache hierarchy favors the Intel part in total capacity. The Intel L3 cache is 36 MB shared, compared to 8 MB shared on the AMD part. The Intel L2 cache is 2 MB per core, compared to 512 KB per core on the AMD part. The Intel L1 cache is 80 KB per core, compared to 64 KB per core on the AMD part.

Process node favors the AMD part in density terms. A 6 nm node from TSMC is smaller than the 10 nm node from Intel. However, the Intel part compensates with more cores and higher clock speeds.

The Intel part supports PCIe Gen 5, while the AMD part maxes out at PCIe Gen 4. This gives the Intel platform newer I/O capabilities. The AMD part has more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16), but the older generation.

Both processors support ECC memory, which is a shared feature. The AMD part supports only DDR5, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5, giving the Intel platform broader memory compatibility.

The market segments differ. The AMD part is marked as Mobile. The Intel part is marked as Desktop. This aligns with socket choices and TDP levels.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmark wins in the database. Its advantage lies entirely in platform characteristics. It uses a smaller process node (6 nm vs 10 nm), has a lower TDP (28 vs 125), and fits a mobile socket (FP7). For a low-power mobile system, the AMD part is the only viable choice in this pair. The Radeon 660M integrated graphics also provide a built-in GPU option for compact systems.

The Intel Core 9 273PQE wins in every measured performance category. Multi-threaded workloads show the largest gap. Cinebench R23 multi-core at 39190 demonstrates heavy parallel throughput. Passmark multithread at 46107 confirms sustained multi-core capability. Single-thread performance is also strong, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 5532 and Passmark single-thread at 4573.

Specific Passmark subtests show where the Intel part excels. Integer math at 164629 indicates strong general arithmetic. Floating-point math at 125546 shows good scientific and engineering throughput. Data compression at 585752 is a standout result, suggesting excellent file archiving and compression workloads. Data encryption at 29636 provides solid security-related processing. Extended instructions at 38743 covers SIMD and specialized instruction sets.

The Intel part also wins on memory bandwidth, recording 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s on the AMD part. Its PCIe Gen 5 support offers newer connectivity for storage and graphics. The larger L3 cache (36 MB vs 8 MB) benefits workloads with repeated data access.

The nearest rival data confirms the Intel part's competitive position. It sits within 1.2% of the AMD EPYC 4465P and within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D. This places the Core 9 273PQE in the upper tier of desktop processors, despite being slightly behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus by 1.1%.

For a desktop workstation or high-performance build, the Intel Core 9 273PQE is the clear choice from the recorded data. For a portable, low-power laptop or mini-PC, the AMD Ryzen 3 110 is the only option in this comparison, though its performance cannot be quantified from the database. The choice hinges on platform, not on benchmark results, because the AMD part has no scores to compare.