AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core 7 360 Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the Intel Core 7 360?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core 7 360 has 6 cores and 6 threads. The Intel part has more physical cores, but the AMD part has more threads due to simultaneous multithreading.

Q: How do their clock speeds compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The Intel Core 7 360 has a lower base clock of 1.50 GHz but a significantly higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a smaller manufacturing process node?

A: The Intel Core 7 360 uses a 3 nm process node fabricated by Intel, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses a 6 nm process node from TSMC. The Intel chip is built on a denser process.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports dual-channel DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel Core 7 360 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X but uses a single-channel memory bus, resulting in a lower memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s.

Q: How does the Intel Core 7 360 perform in Cinebench R23 multi-core relative to its rivals?

A: The Intel Core 7 360 scores 13634 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i3-13100 with an average score of 18380 (0% delta), the Intel Core 5 330 at 18345 (0.2% delta), the Intel Core i3-14100 at 18318 (0.3% delta), and the Intel Core 3 305 at 18302 (0.4% delta).

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 3 110 have any benchmark scores recorded in the database?

A: No. The database contains no benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen 3 110, with an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile of 50 among all CPUs. The Intel Core 7 360 has 17 recorded benchmark scores and an average benchmark score of 18374.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design families. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 is built on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, and belongs to the Ryzen 3 generation. It uses a 6 nm process node from TSMC with a die size of 210 mm². The Intel Core 7 360 is based on the Wildcat Lake codename, belongs to the Core 5 generation, and uses a 3 nm process node fabricated by Intel. The Intel chip has no listed die size.

Cache organization differs substantially. The AMD chip allocates 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip provides 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. This means the Intel part has three times the L1 cache per core and roughly five times the L2 cache per core, though the AMD chip has a larger shared L3 pool.

Memory architecture also diverges. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses a dual-channel memory bus supporting DDR5 with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s and includes ECC memory support. The Intel Core 7 360 uses a single-channel memory bus supporting both DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with a lower bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s and no ECC support. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the AMD chip offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel chip provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics further separate the two. The AMD part uses a Radeon 660M, while the Intel part uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. Both target the mobile market segment and are currently listed as Active in production. The AMD chip launched on 2025-09-30, while the Intel chip has a launch date of 2026-04-15. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

The Intel Core 7 360 has a launch MSRP of $426, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no listed launch MSRP. The socket types are also different: the AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP7, and the Intel chip uses Intel BGA 1516. The part numbers are 100-000000549 (FP7r2) for AMD and SAE3E for Intel.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the Intel Core 7 360. The winsA and winsB fields are both 0, and the headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmark scores at all, which means no comparative analysis can be performed from measured data.

The Intel Core 7 360, however, has extensive benchmark data. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1374 in multi-core and 193 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 5726 multi-core and 808 single-core. Cinebench R23 shows 13634 multi-core and 1924 single-core. These scores position the Intel chip at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 18374.

PassMark tests for the Intel Core 7 360 show a multi-thread score of 15544, a single-thread score of 4274, integer math at 34238, floating-point math at 44963, data compression at 142877, data encryption at 11164, extended instructions at 12390, prime number finding at 120, physics at 1213, and random string sorting at 17636.

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core 7 360 are all Intel parts with very similar average scores. The Intel Core i3-13100 has an average score of 18380 with a 0% delta, making it effectively a statistical tie. The Intel Core 5 330 scores 18345 (0.2% delta), the Intel Core i3-14100 scores 18318 (0.3% delta), and the Intel Core 3 305 scores 18302 (0.4% delta). These deltas are all within half a percent, indicating that the Core 7 360 performs nearly identically to a range of Intel processors in the aggregate benchmark average.

Since the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no benchmark scores, the database cannot establish any relative performance advantage for either processor. The percentile ranking for the AMD chip is 50, which indicates a median position among all CPUs, but this is not supported by any actual benchmark entries in the data.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 110 | Intel Core 7 360 |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 4 | 6 |

| Threads | 8 | 6 |

| Base Clock | 3.00 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.30 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Not listed |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Wildcat Lake |

| Generation | Ryzen 3 (Zen 3+ Rembrandt) | Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 210 mm² | Not listed |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB per core | 192 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB per core | 2.5 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB shared | 6 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 6 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 660M | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) |

| Release Date | 2025-09-30 | 2026-04-15 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $426 |

| Part Number | 100-000000549 (FP7r2) | SAE3E |

The remaining fields are identical: both are mobile processors, both are Active in production, neither has an unlocked multiplier, and neither has a v-cache 3D option. The AMD chip has a higher TDP at 28 W versus 15 W for the Intel chip, which reflects the higher base clock and dual-channel memory controller. The Intel chip compensates with a much higher boost clock and a smaller process node.

The Verdict

The data presents an incomplete comparison. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmark scores, while the Intel Core 7 360 has 17 benchmark entries and a 72nd percentile ranking. Selecting the Intel Core 7 360 is straightforward from a data perspective: it delivers measured performance across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and multiple PassMark workloads, with an average benchmark score of 18374.

The Intel Core 7 360 also offers a higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz, a smaller 3 nm process node, and a lower TDP of 15 W. Its single-channel memory bus and 6 MB L3 cache are limitations, but the recorded benchmarks confirm functional performance in the aggregate. The nearest rivals, all within 0.4% delta, suggest that the Core 7 360 is competitive with other Intel parts in its class.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 provides dual-channel memory with higher bandwidth, ECC support, and more PCIe lanes. It also has a higher thread count at 8 threads versus 6 threads, and a larger shared L3 cache at 8 MB versus 6 MB. These architectural advantages could translate to better performance in memory-sensitive or heavily threaded workloads, but no benchmark data exists to confirm this.

For users who require measured performance data, the Intel Core 7 360 is the only option with verified scores. For users who prioritize memory bandwidth, ECC support, or thread count, the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has the architectural specifications to potentially deliver, but the database provides no evidence of its actual performance. The verdict from the recorded data is clear: the Intel Core 7 360 has established benchmark results, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 remains unverified.