AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core 7 350 Comparison

AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core 7 350: A mobile processor comparison based on recorded benchmark data and specification analysis.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads. The AMD chip uses simultaneous multithreading to reach 8 threads, whereas the Intel chip runs one thread per core.

Q: What are the base and boost clock differences?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 runs at a 3.00 GHz base clock and boosts to 4.30 GHz. The Intel Core 7 350 has a lower 1.50 GHz base clock but a higher 4.80 GHz boost clock.

Q: Which processor has a higher process node efficiency?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 is built on a 3 nm process node from Intel, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses a 6 nm node from TSMC. The Intel chip also has a lower TDP of 15 watts compared to 28 watts for the AMD part.

Q: How do their cache configurations compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 64 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core, plus 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 7 350 has 192 KB L1 and 2.5 MB L2 per core, but only 6 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What memory types do they support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core 7 350 supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X, but uses a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the Intel Core 7 350's benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 sits at the 71st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17779. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core 5 221TE, scores 17860, a 0.5% difference.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 7 350 uses the Wildcat Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry.

Core topology is a major split. AMD configures the Ryzen 3 110 with 4 physical cores and 8 threads, relying on simultaneous multithreading to double thread count. Intel's Core 7 350 instead offers 6 physical cores with no multithreading, producing 6 threads. This means the AMD chip favors heavily threaded workloads that benefit from additional logical processors, while the Intel chip offers more physical cores for raw parallel throughput.

Cache hierarchies differ substantially. The AMD part allocates 64 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core, with a shared 8 MB L3 pool. Intel's Wildcat Lake design uses a much larger per-core L2 at 2.5 MB, plus 192 KB L1 per core, but a smaller 6 MB shared L3. The larger L2 on Intel likely reduces reliance on the shared L3 for frequently accessed data.

Memory support diverges as well. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 runs dual-channel DDR5, delivering a theoretical 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core 7 350 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X but operates on a single-channel bus, capping bandwidth at 59.7 GB/s. This gives AMD a 28.6% bandwidth advantage, which can matter in memory-intensive tasks.

PCIe connectivity also differs. AMD provides 20 Gen 4 lanes from the CPU, while Intel only offers 6 Gen 4 lanes. This makes the AMD platform more suitable for configurations needing multiple high-speed devices. Additionally, the AMD chip supports ECC memory, a feature absent on the Intel part.

Integrated graphics are another distinction. AMD pairs the CPU with Radeon 660M graphics, while Intel uses Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. Both target mobile segments but represent different GPU architectures.

Process node and power efficiency also separate the pair. Intel's 3 nm node is denser than AMD's 6 nm, and the Intel chip draws only 15 W TDP versus 28 W for AMD. The AMD processor has a larger die at 210 mm², while Intel's die size is not recorded in the database.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded benchmark suite, the Intel Core 7 350 has all 17 recorded scores, meaning it wins every benchmark category where data exists. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so the comparison relies entirely on Intel's measured performance.

The Intel chip excels in multi-core scenarios. In Cinebench R23 multicore, it scores 8030, while its single-core score reaches 2046. These numbers indicate strong performance in rendering, video encoding, and other parallel workloads. The 6 physical cores provide a solid foundation for such tasks.

Single-thread performance is also a strength. The Cinebench R15 single-core score of 292 and R20 single-core score of 758 demonstrate that the 4.80 GHz boost clock delivers competitive responsiveness. PassMark's single-thread score of 4100 confirms this trend. This benefits everyday tasks like web browsing, office applications, and lightweight productivity work.

The Intel part shows notable strengths in data processing tasks. PassMark data compression scores 143123, while data encryption hits 10933. Extended instructions score 12045, indicating good SIMD and vector processing capability. Floating-point math reaches 42809, and integer math scores 33734.

Random string sorting, a test of memory access patterns, scores 17238. Physics calculations reach 1173, and the multithread score is 15170. Prime number finding scores 107. These results collectively position the Intel Core 7 350 as a capable mobile processor for a broad range of computing tasks.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110, lacking recorded benchmarks, cannot claim wins in any measured category. Its architectural advantages, such as dual-channel memory and higher PCIe lane count, may translate to real-world benefits, but the database contains no direct performance evidence to support that conclusion.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 110 | Intel Core 7 350 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 6 |

| Threads | 8 | 6 |

| Base Clock | 3.00 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.30 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Wildcat Lake |

| Process Node | 6 nm (TSMC) | 3 nm (Intel) |

| Die Size | 210 mm² | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB per core | 192 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB per core | 2.5 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB shared | 6 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes | Gen 4, 6 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 660M | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) |

| Part Number | 100-000000549 (FP7r2) | SAE3F |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $469 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 7 350 holds all recorded benchmark scores, so the head-to-head comparison is one-sided. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no measurements in the database, meaning every win belongs to Intel based on available data.

In Cinebench R23, the Intel chip scores 8030 in multicore and 2046 in single-core. The multicore result reflects the advantage of 6 physical cores over 4, even without multithreading. The single-core score benefits from the 4.80 GHz boost clock, which is 11.6% higher than AMD's 4.30 GHz peak.

Cinebench R20 shows 5373 in multicore and 758 in single-core. R15 results are 1220 and 292 respectively. These progressive scores indicate consistent scaling across the Cinebench versions, with the multicore advantage growing as the workload becomes more demanding.

PassMark tests reveal specific strengths. The multithread score of 15170 aligns with the multicore Cinebench results, confirming good parallel performance. The single-thread score of 4100 is particularly strong, given the low 1.50 GHz base clock. The boost clock clearly does heavy lifting in short, single-threaded bursts.

Data-centric workloads show varied results. Compression at 143123 and encryption at 10933 demonstrate solid throughput in these areas. The extended instructions score of 12045 indicates competent SIMD processing. Floating-point math reaches 42809, while integer math scores 33734, showing balanced arithmetic capability.

Memory-related tests, such as random string sorting at 17238, reflect the single-channel memory configuration's limitations. The 59.7 GB/s bandwidth is lower than AMD's dual-channel 76.8 GB/s, but the Intel chip still completes the task effectively. Physics calculations score 1173, and prime number finding scores 107.

The Intel Core 7 350's nearest rivals provide context for its standing. The Intel Core 5 221TE scores 17860, a 0.5% difference from the Core 7 350's 17779. The AMD EPYC 9374F scores 17693, a 0.5% gap the other way. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT scores 17891, a 0.6% difference, and the Intel Core 5 120U scores 17898, a 0.7% difference. These tight margins place the Core 7 350 in a competitive cluster of mid-range processors.

The Intel chip's 71st percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates it outperforms roughly two-thirds of the processors in the database. This positioning, combined with its 17779 average benchmark score, establishes it as a solid mobile option. The AMD Ryzen 3 110, with a 50th percentile and no benchmark scores, cannot be directly ranked against it in the recorded data.