AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core 7 253PQE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the AMD Ryzen 3 110 contains no benchmark scores, while the Intel Core 7 253PQE has a full set of Cinebench and PassMark results. This makes direct numerical comparison one-sided, but the available figures for the Intel part still define its performance envelope clearly.

In Cinebench R23, the Intel Core 7 253PQE scores 31,390 in multi-core and 4,431 in single-core. The R20 run shows 13,183 multi-core and 1,861 single-core, while R15 lands at 3,163 multi-core and 446 single-core. These results indicate a processor that scales strongly across threaded workloads, with the single-core figures confirming high per-thread efficiency.

PassMark results for the Intel part reinforce the multi-threaded strength. The multithread score is 41,656, with integer math at 137,795 and floating point math at 105,279. Data compression reaches 487,335, while encryption hits 25,515. Extended instructions score 32,390, random string sorting 54,222, and prime number finding 206. Single-thread performance sits at 4,389 in PassMark.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmark entries in the database. Its percentile rank against all CPUs is 50, while the Intel Core 7 253PQE sits at the 91st percentile. The Intel part's average benchmark score is 55,919. The nearest rivals to the Intel chip show how close the top of this performance band is: Intel Core i9-14900HX averages 56,004 (0.2% higher), AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 averages 56,273 (0.6% higher), AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 averages 56,306 (0.7% higher), and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX averages 56,555 (1.1% higher). The Intel Core 7 253PQE trails each of those four chips by less than 1.1%, placing it in a tightly contested performance tier.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 253PQE wins every category where data exists: multi-core, single-core, and all specialized workloads. Its 10 cores and 20 threads provide a substantial parallel processing advantage over the AMD Ryzen 3 110's 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel chip also leads in clock speed, with a 5.70 GHz boost versus the AMD part's 4.30 GHz, and a 3.50 GHz base versus 3.00 GHz.

For content creation and heavy multitasking, the Intel part's Cinebench scores indicate strong sustained throughput. The R23 multi-core result of 31,390 places it well above typical mid-range desktop processors, and the PassMark multithread score of 41,656 confirms this pattern. Single-core performance is equally dominant, with the R23 single-core score of 4,431 showing high responsiveness for lightly threaded applications.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no benchmark wins recorded in the database, meaning no workload category shows it ahead. Its advantages are architectural and platform-based rather than performance-based: it uses a 6 nm process, draws 28 W TDP, and targets mobile devices. The Intel part draws 125 W TDP and targets desktop systems. For battery-operated or thermally constrained environments, the AMD part's lower power envelope is the only measurable advantage, though no performance numbers confirm its efficiency in practice.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, built on TSMC's 6 nm process. It has 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The die size is 210 mm². Cache consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3. Memory support is DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth and ECC capability. PCIe is Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics is Radeon 660M. The socket is AMD Socket FP7, and the part number is 100-000000549 (FP7r2). Production status is Active, with a release date of September 30, 2025.

The Intel Core 7 253PQE uses a different approach. Codenamed Bartlett Lake, it is built on Intel's 10 nm process. It has 10 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. Cache is larger across the board: 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 33 MB shared L3. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC capability. PCIe is Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics is UHD Graphics 770. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, and the part number is SA4QA. Production status is Active, with a release date of March 8, 2026.

The process node difference is significant: 6 nm for AMD versus 10 nm for Intel. The AMD part's smaller process allows for lower power consumption (28 W TDP versus 125 W), while the Intel part compensates with higher clocks and more cores. The Intel chip's L3 cache is over four times larger (33 MB versus 8 MB), which benefits workloads with large working sets. The AMD part's L1 and L2 caches are smaller per core as well, though the per-core ratios follow different design philosophies.

The memory bandwidth difference favors Intel: 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s, a 16.7% advantage. PCIe generation also differs, with Intel offering Gen 5 (16 lanes) versus AMD's Gen 4 (20 lanes). The lane count favors AMD, but the newer generation favors Intel for devices that can use the bandwidth.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PQE has 10 cores and 20 threads. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a 28 W TDP. The Intel Core 7 253PQE has a 125 W TDP.

Q: Which processor supports faster PCIe?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PQE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

Q: How do their cache sizes compare?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PQE has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 33 MB shared L3. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PQE boosts to 5.70 GHz. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 boosts to 4.30 GHz.

Q: What memory types does each support?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PQE supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 only. Both use dual-channel configuration.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 110 | Intel Core 7 253PQE |

|---------------|-----------------|---------------------|

| Cores | 4 | 10 |

| Threads | 8 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 3.00 GHz | 3.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.30 GHz | 5.70 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 125 W |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB (shared) | 33 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 660M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2025-09-30 | 2026-03-08 |

| Launch MSRP | None listed | $409 |

The Intel Core 7 253PQE holds the advantage in core count, thread count, clock speeds, cache capacity, memory bandwidth, and PCIe generation. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 counters with a smaller process node, lower TDP, more PCIe lanes, and a mobile form factor. The Intel part's launch MSRP is $409, while the AMD part has no listed launch MSRP.