AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core 7 253PE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark runs between the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the Intel Core 7 253PE. However, the available measurement set for the Intel Core 7 253PE provides a detailed performance profile across Cinebench and Passmark workloads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This asymmetry means the comparison must rely on the Intel part's absolute results and its position among nearest rivals, plus the architectural specifications of both processors.

The Intel Core 7 253PE delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24880 and a single-core score of 3512. In Cinebench R20, it records 10449 multi-core and 1475 single-core. The older Cinebench R15 run shows 2507 multi-core and 354 single-core. The single-core progression from R15 to R23 (354 to 3512) reflects the test's scaling rather than a processor anomaly. The Passmark suite shows a multi-thread score of 29271 and a single-thread score of 3955, with integer math at 114158 and floating point math at 80870. Data compression reaches 339133, data encryption 18385, extended instructions 21806, prime number finding 138, physics 1845, and random string sorting 32777.

The Intel Core 7 253PE sits at the 87th percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 40557. Its nearest rivals in the database are tightly clustered: the Intel Core 5 223PE averages 40585, just 0.1 percent higher; the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H averages 40518, 0.1 percent lower; the Intel Xeon 6357P averages 40630, 0.2 percent higher; and the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H averages 40431, 0.3 percent lower. The Core 7 253PE is effectively within a 0.4 percent band of these four processors, indicating that its overall performance ranks alongside upper-mid-range parts from both Intel and AMD, despite the lack of a direct measured score for the Ryzen 3 110.

Because the Ryzen 3 110 has no benchmark entries, the database cannot produce a win count for either side in head-to-head comparisons. The winsA and winsB fields are both zero, confirming that no direct measurement exists. The Intel part's recorded results stand alone, and any comparison to the AMD part must be drawn from the structural differences in the specification data rather than from measured performance deltas.

The Verdict

The recorded data favors the Intel Core 7 253PE in every measurable performance category, but this is a consequence of data availability as much as engineering. The Intel part has 10 cores and 20 threads, a 5.50 GHz boost clock, 33 MB of shared L3 cache, and an average benchmark score of 40557 at the 87th percentile. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads, a 4.30 GHz boost clock, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache, with no benchmark score recorded and a 50th percentile placement that reflects its specification-based standing rather than measured results.

The Intel processor also carries a launch MSRP of $384. The AMD part has no launch MSRP listed. The Intel part is a desktop processor with a 65 W TDP, while the AMD part is a mobile processor with a 28 W TDP. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the AMD part supports DDR5 only with 76.8 GB/s. The Intel part uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD part uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

The verdict from the data is straightforward: the Intel Core 7 253PE is the higher-performing processor by core count, cache size, clock speed, memory bandwidth, and measured benchmarks. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 is the lower-power mobile option. The database shows no measured performance for the AMD part, so any claim of AMD competitiveness in raw throughput would lack supporting evidence. The Intel part's 87th percentile placement and its near-tie with four rivals in the 40431 to 40630 range establish it as a solid mid-to-upper performer.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge sharply in architecture. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The die size is 210 mm². The Intel Core 7 253PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel. The Intel die size is not recorded in the database.

Core and thread counts differ substantially. The AMD part has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel part has 10 cores and 20 threads. The AMD part's base clock is 3.00 GHz with a boost of 4.30 GHz. The Intel part's base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost of 5.50 GHz. The Intel part boosts 1.20 GHz higher but starts 0.50 GHz lower at base.

Cache hierarchies are structured differently. The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3. The Intel L2 per core is four times larger, and the shared L3 is more than four times larger.

Memory support differs. The AMD part supports DDR5 only, dual-channel, with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth and ECC support. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5, dual-channel, with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC support. The Intel memory bandwidth is 12.8 GB/s higher.

PCIe connectivity differs by generation and lane count. The AMD part uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part carries the newer PCIe generation but fewer lanes.

Integrated graphics differ. The AMD part has the Radeon 660M. The Intel part has UHD Graphics 730. Both are integrated solutions, but the database does not provide comparative graphics benchmark scores.

Sockets and market segments differ. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile socket, and its market segment is Mobile. The Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop socket, and its market segment is Desktop. The AMD part is a 28 W part; the Intel part is a 65 W part.

Release dates differ. The AMD part was released on 2025-09-30. The Intel part was released on 2026-03-08. The Intel part launched roughly five and a half months later. The production status for both is Active.

Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part number is 100-000000549(FP7r2). The Intel part number is SA4QE.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE has 10 cores and 20 threads. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the difference in boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE boosts to 5.50 GHz. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 boosts to 4.30 GHz. The Intel part boosts 1.20 GHz higher.

Q: How does the cache compare between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The Intel Core 7 253PE has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 only, dual-channel, with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core 7 253PE supports DDR4 and DDR5, dual-channel, with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a TDP of 28 W. The Intel Core 7 253PE has a TDP of 65 W.

Q: What benchmark scores are recorded for the Intel Core 7 253PE?

A: The Intel part records a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24880, a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3512, a Passmark multi-thread score of 29271, and a Passmark single-thread score of 3955. Its average benchmark score is 40557, placing it at the 87th percentile.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 3 110 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen 3 110, and its average benchmark score is 0.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 253PE wins in every category where measured data exists. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24880 and single-core score of 3512 indicate strong throughput in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The Passmark integer math score of 114158 and floating point math score of 80870 show balanced arithmetic performance. The data compression result of 339133 and random string sorting result of 32777 indicate strong memory-access and data-manipulation throughput. The extended instructions score of 21806 and encryption score of 18385 round out a broad performance envelope.

The Intel part's nearest rivals sit within a narrow band. The Intel Core 5 223PE scores 40585, the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H scores 40518, the Intel Xeon 6357P scores 40630, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H scores 40431. The Core 7 253PE's 40557 average places it between the Core Ultra X7 368H and the Ryzen 9 7940H, slightly behind the Core 5 223PE and Xeon 6357P. This clustering means the Intel part trades places with these four processors by fractions of a percent, making the choice among them a matter of specific workload rather than overall dominance.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110, with no recorded benchmarks, cannot claim any measured win. Its specification-based advantages are limited to lower TDP (28 W vs 65 W), higher PCIe lane count (20 vs 16), and a smaller process node (6 nm vs 10 nm). It also uses the FP7 mobile socket, which is designed for portable systems. The Intel part offers a significantly larger core count, higher boost clock, larger caches, higher memory bandwidth, and support for both DDR4 and DDR5.

For multi-threaded rendering, compilation, or data processing, the Intel part's 10 cores and 20 threads with a 24880 Cinebench R23 multi-core score give it a clear edge. For single-threaded responsiveness, its 5.50 GHz boost clock and 3512 Cinebench R23 single-core score support strong performance. For low-power mobile deployments where a 28 W TDP matters more than raw throughput, the AMD part is the only option in this pairing that fits that profile. The Intel part is a desktop processor with a 65 W TDP and Socket 1700, which requires a desktop platform. The AMD part is a mobile processor with Socket FP7, which requires a mobile platform. The data does not support any measured performance advantage for the AMD part, but its power envelope and mobile socket define its intended use case.