AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core 7 251TE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 and Intel Core 7 251TE occupy different segments of the processor market, with the database recording a substantial gap in their measured performance profiles. The Ryzen 3 110 is a 4-core, 8-thread mobile processor built on Zen 3+ architecture, while the Intel Core 7 251TE is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor based on the Bartlett Lake platform. The benchmark data shows the Intel part achieving an average benchmark score of 41,650, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs tracked, while the AMD part has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile. This difference in recorded data is the first major distinction between the two units.

FAQ

Q: How do the core counts compare between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core 7 251TE has 24 cores and 32 threads. This represents a 6x difference in core count and a 4x difference in thread count.

Q: What is the boost clock difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, while the Intel Core 7 251TE reaches 5.40 GHz. The Intel part has a 1.10 GHz higher boost clock.

Q: Which processor supports DDR5 memory?

A: Both processors support DDR5 memory. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 exclusively, while the Intel Core 7 251TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: What is the difference in memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 76.8 GB/s. The Intel part has a 12.8 GB/s higher memory bandwidth.

Q: Do both processors have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, both have integrated graphics. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses the Radeon 660M, and the Intel Core 7 251TE uses UHD Graphics 770.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has 28 MB more L3 cache.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split between these two processors is fundamental. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core 7 251TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel's own foundry. The process node difference is significant, with AMD using the smaller 6 nm node. Die sizes are similar, with the AMD part at 210 mm² and the Intel part at 215 mm².

Cache hierarchy differs substantially. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 7 251TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has larger per-core caches and a much larger shared L3 pool.

The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP7 and belongs to the Rembrandt-R family. The Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700. The market segments differ: the AMD part targets mobile, while the Intel part targets desktop. Both processors support ECC memory, and both have locked multipliers. The AMD part has a part number of 100-000000549(FP7r2), while the Intel part is identified as SRQAXQ5ZG.

PCIe support differs by generation and lane count. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The Intel Core 7 251TE provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part has the newer PCIe generation, while the AMD part has more total lanes. Memory support also differs: the AMD part supports only DDR5, while the Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Release dates differ by several months. The Intel Core 7 251TE was released on 2025-01-12, and the AMD Ryzen 3 110 was released on 2025-09-30. Both processors are listed as Active in production status.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains benchmark results for the Intel Core 7 251TE across multiple test suites. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so all head-to-head comparisons rely on the Intel part's measured results and its position relative to other processors.

In Cinebench R15, the Intel Core 7 251TE scores 2,572 in multi-core and 362 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 10,717 in multi-core and 1,512 in single-core. In Cinebench R23, it scores 25,518 in multi-core and 3,602 in single-core. These results show a heavy multi-core advantage, with the R23 multi-core score being roughly 7 times the single-core score.

PassMark results for the Intel Core 7 251TE show strong performance across diverse workloads. The multi-thread score is 30,022, and the single-thread score is 3,568. The integer math score is 125,739, while the floating-point math score is 85,607. Data compression scores 334,399, and data encryption scores 22,176. Extended instructions score 16,974, and find prime numbers scores 140. Random string sorting scores 39,643, and physics scores 1,938.

The Intel Core 7 251TE has an average benchmark score of 41,650, which places it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals, based on average score, include the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H with an average score of 41,621, which is 0.1 percent behind. The Intel Core i7-14650HX scores 41,576, which is 0.2 percent behind. The Intel Core i7-12850HX scores 41,779, which is 0.3 percent ahead. The Intel Core i7-14700T scores 41,914, which is 0.6 percent ahead.

The data shows that the Intel Core 7 251TE sits in a tightly packed cluster of high-performance processors. Its average score of 41,650 is within 0.6 percent of the Intel Core i7-14700T, which is the strongest rival in the recorded set. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H is the closest rival, with a score difference of only 0.1 percent, indicating near-identical measured performance.

Since the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmark scores, the database cannot provide a direct performance comparison between the two parts. The absence of scores for the AMD processor means that any performance delta between the two is not quantified in the recorded data. The Intel part's 88th percentile placement, combined with its 24-core configuration, indicates a much higher performance tier than the 4-core AMD part, but the exact magnitude of that gap is not present in the database.

Specification Differences

The specification differences between the two processors are extensive and cover nearly every major category.

Core and thread counts: the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core 7 251TE has 24 cores and 32 threads.

Clock speeds: the AMD part has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 1.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The AMD part has a higher base clock by 1.60 GHz, while the Intel part has a higher boost clock by 1.10 GHz.

Thermal design power: the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Core 7 251TE has a TDP of 45 watts. The Intel part has a 17 watt higher TDP.

Socket: the AMD part uses AMD Socket FP7, and the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700.

Process node: the AMD part is on 6 nm, and the Intel part is on 10 nm.

Foundry: the AMD part is made by TSMC, and the Intel part is made by Intel.

Die size: the AMD part is 210 mm², and the Intel part is 215 mm².

Cache: the AMD part has 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3. The Intel part has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3.

Memory support: the AMD part supports DDR5 only, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Memory bandwidth: the AMD part has 76.8 GB/s, and the Intel part has 89.6 GB/s.

PCIe: the AMD part has Gen 4 with 20 lanes, and the Intel part has Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Integrated graphics: the AMD part uses Radeon 660M, and the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 770.

Market segment: the AMD part is mobile, and the Intel part is desktop.

Release date: the AMD part released 2025-09-30, and the Intel part released 2025-01-12.

The Intel part has a recorded launch MSRP of $384. The AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP in the database.

The Verdict

The recorded data presents a clear performance hierarchy. The Intel Core 7 251TE is a high-performance desktop processor with 24 cores, 32 threads, a 5.40 GHz boost clock, and an average benchmark score of 41,650, placing it in the 88th percentile. Its benchmark results across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and multiple PassMark tests show strong multi-threaded throughput. The R23 multi-core score of 25,518 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 30,022 confirm a processor designed for heavy parallel workloads.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 is a mobile processor with 4 cores, 8 threads, a 4.30 GHz boost clock, and a 28 watt TDP. It has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so its measured performance cannot be compared directly against the Intel part. Its specification profile places it in a much lower performance tier based on core count, thread count, and cache size.

The database indicates that the Intel Core 7 251TE belongs to a performance tier that includes processors like the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H, Intel Core i7-14650HX, Intel Core i7-12850HX, and Intel Core i7-14700T. All of these rivals have average scores between 41,576 and 41,914, with the Intel Core 7 251TE sitting at 41,650. The performance differences among these rivals are all within 0.6 percent, indicating a dense cluster of similarly performing processors.

For a user choosing between these two specific parts, the Intel Core 7 251TE offers a much larger core and thread count, a higher boost clock, a larger L3 cache, higher memory bandwidth, and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. It also provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity and a newer release date. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 offers a higher base clock, a smaller process node, a lower TDP, and more PCIe lanes, but with fewer cores and threads.

The mobile versus desktop distinction is also significant. The AMD part targets mobile systems with a 28 watt TDP, while the Intel part targets desktop systems with a 45 watt TDP. The Intel part's higher TDP reflects its larger core count and higher sustained performance envelope. The AMD part's lower TDP makes it suitable for power-constrained mobile designs.

The benchmark data shows that the Intel Core 7 251TE achieves strong results in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,602 and multi-core score of 25,518 demonstrate balanced capability. The PassMark results reinforce this, with a single-thread score of 3,568 and a multi-thread score of 30,022. The data compression score of 334,399 and the integer math score of 125,739 indicate particularly strong performance in those specific workloads.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110, without recorded benchmarks, cannot be positioned relative to the Intel part through measured data. The specification sheet alone shows a processor with fewer cores, less cache, and lower memory bandwidth. The Intel part is the stronger choice for workloads that benefit from high core counts, large shared caches, and higher memory bandwidth. The AMD part is the lower-power mobile option with a smaller process node and higher base clock.

The database records the Intel Core 7 251TE with a launch MSRP of $384. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded launch MSRP. The absence of benchmark scores for the AMD part means that the database cannot provide a measured performance delta between the two processors. The Intel part's 88th percentile ranking and its proximity to several high-end Intel rivals confirm its position as a competitive desktop processor in the recorded data.