AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core 7 251E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database currently holds no recorded head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the Intel Core 7 251E. Both processors have an empty benchmark score set, and the wins counter for each side stands at zero. This means there is no measured performance data from our database that directly compares these two chips in any workload, whether single-threaded, multi-threaded, or graphics-based.

The absence of scores does not imply parity. It simply reflects that no standardized test has been logged for this pairing yet. The average benchmark score for both units is recorded as 0, and both sit at the 50th percentile against all CPUs in the database, which is a placeholder value rather than a measured ranking. Without actual test runs, any attempt to rank them against each other would rely on specification analysis rather than recorded outcomes.

What can be stated from the recorded data is that the Intel part carries a 24-core, 32-thread configuration versus the AMD part’s 4-core, 8-thread layout. The Intel boost clock is listed at 5.60 GHz, while the AMD boost clock is 4.30 GHz. These are the largest numerical disparities in the specification sheet, but they do not translate into benchmark wins because no benchmark has been executed.

Where Each One Wins

Since there are zero recorded wins for either processor in the head-to-head category, the database cannot assign a workload advantage to either side. The wins field for both itemA and itemB is 0. This is a null result, not a competitive one.

The data does indicate market segmentation differences that would influence where each processor would likely find its strongest measured performance once benchmarks are run. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 is classified as a mobile part, using the AMD Socket FP7, with a 28 W TDP. The Intel Core 7 251E is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700 with a 65 W TDP. Mobile parts typically favor efficiency and sustained low-power operation, while desktop parts with higher TDP allowances tend to deliver higher sustained multi-threaded throughput. The Intel part’s 24 cores and 32 threads would normally dominate heavily threaded workloads, while the AMD part’s smaller core count and higher per-core base clock (3.00 GHz versus 2.10 GHz) would normally favor lightly threaded tasks. These are expectations based on specifications, not benchmark results.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses the Zen 3+ microarchitecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 7 251E uses the Bartlett Lake codename, fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel’s own foundry. Both are active production units, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Core and thread counts differ substantially. The AMD chip provides 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel chip provides 24 cores and 32 threads. Cache hierarchies also diverge. The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel L3 pool is 4.5 times larger in absolute terms.

Memory support differs. The AMD processor supports DDR5 only, with dual-channel configuration and a rated memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, with a higher rated bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity differs by generation and lane count. The AMD part uses Gen 4 with 20 CPU-only lanes. The Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes. The integrated graphics differ as well: AMD includes Radeon 660M, while Intel includes UHD Graphics 770.

Die size and socket also separate the two. The AMD die is 210 mm², the Intel die is 257 mm². The AMD socket is FP7 (specifically the FP7r2 variant), while Intel uses Socket 1700. Part numbers are recorded as 100-000000549(FP7r2) for AMD and SRQDUQ657 for Intel.

Release dates differ. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 is dated 2025-09-30, while the Intel Core 7 251E is dated 2025-01-12. The Intel chip has a recorded launch MSRP of $384; the AMD chip has no recorded launch MSRP.

The Verdict

From the recorded data alone, no verdict can be issued on relative performance because no benchmark scores exist. The database shows zero measured wins for either side, zero average scores, and no nearest rivals list. What can be determined is the specification-based positioning.

The Intel Core 7 251E is the larger part by core count, thread count, cache capacity, boost clock, memory bandwidth, and PCIe generation. It also has a higher TDP and a later release date in early 2025. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 is the smaller, lower-power mobile part with a higher base clock and a smaller die, released later in September 2025.

A user selecting between these two would be choosing between a desktop workstation-class chip with 24 cores and a mobile chip with 4 cores. The data in this database provides no measured evidence to favor one over the other. Any selection must be made on the basis of socket compatibility, power envelope, and market segment, all of which are clearly recorded. The Intel part is a desktop component; the AMD part is a mobile component. They are not direct substitutes in typical system builds.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 7 251E has 24 cores. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores.

Q: What is the boost clock for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The Intel Core 7 251E has a boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the Intel Core 7 251E support ECC memory.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 only. The Intel Core 7 251E supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: What is the TDP difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a TDP of 28 W. The Intel Core 7 251E has a TDP of 65 W.

Q: Which processor has the larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 7 251E has 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 8 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What integrated graphics does each processor use?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses Radeon 660M. The Intel Core 7 251E uses UHD Graphics 770.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen 3 110 | Intel Core 7 251E |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 24 |

| Threads | 8 | 32 |

| Base Clock | 3.00 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.30 GHz | 5.60 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Not listed |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Bartlett Lake |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 210 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB (shared) | 36 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 660M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Production Status | Active | Active |

| Release Date | 2025-09-30 | 2025-01-12 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $384 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

| Part Number | 100-000000549(FP7r2) | SRQDUQ657 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 50 | 50 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 0 |