AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core 5 315 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data paints a clear picture of two mobile processors aimed at different priorities. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 arrives with a 4-core, 8-thread configuration built on the Zen 3+ architecture, while the Intel Core 5 315 counters with a 6-core, 6-thread setup based on Wildcat Lake. The benchmark results, however, are entirely one-sided: the Intel Core 5 315 holds every recorded performance score in the database, with zero wins registered for the AMD part.

The Intel Core 5 315 posts a multi-thread score of 12,981 in Cinebench R23, while its single-core result in the same test reaches 1,832 points. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no benchmark entries in the database, meaning no direct measurement exists for comparison. The available measurements for the Intel chip show consistent strength across both synthetic and workload-specific tests. PassMark integer math scores 31,690, floating-point math reaches 42,441, and the extended instructions test hits 13,143. Data compression tasks complete at 146,143 points, while encryption workloads produce 11,119.

The use-case split emerges from what the Intel part can demonstrably handle. Its multi-thread score of 5,452 in Cinebench R20 and 1,308 in Cinebench R15 indicate a processor capable of sustained productivity workloads. The single-core results, including 769 in Cinebench R20 and 184 in Cinebench R15, suggest responsive day-to-day operation. The database places the Intel Core 5 315 in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 18,188. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 sits at the 50th percentile with no recorded benchmark average.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge fundamentally in their underlying design. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses the Zen 3+ architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process, with a die size of 210 mm². It integrates Radeon 660M graphics and supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, and the chip provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3.

The Intel Core 5 315 uses the Wildcat Lake codename on Intel's 3 nm process, with no die size recorded. It supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, but only over a single-channel bus, yielding 59.7 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported, and PCIe Gen 4 connectivity is limited to 6 lanes from the CPU. The cache structure shows 192 KB of L1, 2.5 MB of L2, and 6 MB of shared L3. Integrated graphics come from Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores.

The core count difference matters: Intel fields 6 physical cores without hyper-threading, while AMD offers 4 cores with 8 threads. The boost clocks are close, with Intel reaching 4.40 GHz and AMD at 4.30 GHz, but the base clocks diverge sharply. Intel runs at 1.50 GHz base, while AMD starts at 3.00 GHz. Thermal design power also differs, with Intel rated at 15 watts and AMD at 28 watts. These architectural choices explain why the Intel part, despite a lower base clock, delivers the recorded performance profile.

The Verdict

The benchmark data indicates that the Intel Core 5 315 is the only one of these two processors with measurable performance in the database. Every recorded score belongs to the Intel part, which achieves a 72nd percentile ranking across all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no benchmark entries and sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of zero. For any workload captured in the database, the Intel Core 5 315 is the demonstrated performer.

The AMD part does offer ECC memory support, a dual-channel memory bus, and more PCIe lanes, which could matter for specific system configurations. The Intel part counters with a smaller process node, a higher boost clock, and a lower TDP. The recorded data, however, provides no evidence of AMD performance capability. The Intel Core 5 315's launch MSRP is $340, and it holds a single-thread PassMark score of 4,021. The choice, strictly from the data, favors Intel for every benchmarked task.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 5 315 has 6 cores and 6 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core 5 315 boosts to 4.40 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 boosts to 4.30 GHz.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 5 315 does not.

Q: What memory bandwidth does each processor provide?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 provides 76.8 GB/s over dual-channel DDR5, while the Intel Core 5 315 provides 59.7 GB/s over single-channel DDR5 or LPDDR5X.

Q: How does the Intel Core 5 315 rank among all CPUs?

A: The database places it in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 18,188.

Q: What is the thermal design power for each chip?

A: The Intel Core 5 315 is rated at 15 watts, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 is rated at 28 watts.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons exist in the database between these two processors. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmark scores, while the Intel Core 5 315 has a full suite of measurements. The Intel part's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,981 and single-core score of 1,832 stand as the only data points available. In PassMark tests, the Intel chip records 15,272 for multi-thread performance and 4,021 for single-thread performance.

The nearest rivals to the Intel Core 5 315 provide context for its standing. The AMD EPYC 9274F scores 18,189, essentially identical with a delta of 0 percent. The Intel Core i7-9700 scores 18,180, also at 0 percent delta. The Intel Core i7-1365U comes in at 18,177 with a 0.1 percent delta, and the AMD Ryzen 7 5700U scores 18,176 with a 0.1 percent delta. These comparisons confirm that the Intel Core 5 315 performs on par with established desktop and mobile processors from previous generations.

The largest recorded win for the Intel part comes in PassMark data compression at 146,143 points, far exceeding its integer math score of 31,690. The floating-point math result of 42,441 and random string sorting at 17,551 further illustrate its workload profile. The find prime numbers test produces a modest 112 points, indicating that this processor is not optimized for that specific task. Physics simulation scores 1,163. These figures, taken together, show a processor that excels in throughput-oriented tasks while remaining competitive in single-threaded responsiveness.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every recorded specification field. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses 4 cores with 8 threads, while the Intel Core 5 315 uses 6 cores with 6 threads. Base clocks differ substantially: AMD at 3.00 GHz versus Intel at 1.50 GHz. Boost clocks are closer, with Intel at 4.40 GHz and AMD at 4.30 GHz. Thermal design power favors Intel at 15 watts versus AMD's 28 watts.

The process nodes are distinct: AMD uses 6 nm TSMC fabrication, while Intel uses 3 nm from its own foundry. The AMD die measures 210 mm², while no die size is recorded for Intel. Cache allocations differ across all levels: AMD provides 64 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, while Intel provides 192 KB of L1 and 2.5 MB of L2 total. Shared L3 cache is 8 MB on AMD and 6 MB on Intel.

Memory support shows AMD with dual-channel DDR5 at 76.8 GB/s and ECC capability, while Intel offers single-channel DDR5 or LPDDR5X at 59.7 GB/s without ECC. PCIe connectivity favors AMD with Gen 4 across 20 lanes, while Intel provides Gen 4 across 6 lanes. Integrated graphics differ: AMD uses Radeon 660M, Intel uses Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The sockets are incompatible: AMD Socket FP7 versus Intel BGA 1516. The release dates also differ, with AMD launching in September 2025 and Intel in April 2026, though the Intel part carries a launch MSRP of $340 while no MSRP is recorded for AMD.