AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core 5 223PTE Comparison

AMD Ryzen 3 110 and Intel Core 5 223PTE are two processors from different market segments, one mobile and one desktop, with distinct architectural approaches. The database shows both CPUs currently hold a 50th percentile ranking among all processors, though neither has recorded benchmark scores yet, meaning direct performance measurements are pending. The recorded data does provide extensive specification differences that define their expected behavior. The Ryzen 3 110 is a 4-core, 8-thread part based on Zen 3+ architecture, while the Core 5 223PTE is an 8-core, 16-thread part using Bartlett Lake architecture. The Intel processor carries a launch MSRP of $232. This analysis compares the two based on the recorded specifications and architectural data.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark section in the database currently contains no recorded results. Neither the AMD Ryzen 3 110 nor the Intel Core 5 223PTE has any benchmark entries in the database, and the wins counter for each processor sits at zero. The average benchmark score for both CPUs is also zero, indicating the absence of measured performance data. As a result, the head-to-head comparison must rely on the specification and architectural differences recorded in the database.

The most significant performance-relevant difference is thread count. The Intel Core 5 223PTE provides 16 threads against the 8 threads of the AMD Ryzen 3 110, exactly double the parallelism. In multi-threaded workloads, the recorded data suggests the Intel processor can process twice as many threads simultaneously. The AMD processor compensates with a higher base clock of 3.00 GHz compared to the Intel base clock of 2.30 GHz, giving it a 0.70 GHz base clock advantage. However, the Intel part has a substantially higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz against the AMD boost of 4.30 GHz, a 1.10 GHz advantage at peak frequency. Single-thread performance, which often scales with boost frequency, should favor the Intel processor based on this data. Multi-thread performance should also favor the Intel processor due to the 2x thread count and higher boost ceiling, though the AMD part may hold an advantage in power-constrained scenarios.

The cache hierarchy heavily favors the Intel processor. The Core 5 223PTE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ryzen 3 110 has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The Intel processor offers 16 MB more L3 cache, and its per-core L2 cache is four times larger. These cache differences suggest the Intel processor can hold more working data closer to the cores, which benefits workloads with repeated data access. Memory bandwidth also favors Intel, with 89.6 GB/s against 76.8 GB/s for the AMD part, a 12.8 GB/s difference. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD processor supports only DDR5, giving the Intel platform broader memory compatibility.

The AMD processor counters with a more efficient process node. It is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel processor uses a 10 nm process at Intel. The smaller process node typically allows the AMD part to deliver comparable performance at lower power draw. The TDP figures reflect this: the Ryzen 3 110 has a 28 W TDP, while the Core 5 223PTE has a 45 W TDP. The AMD processor draws 17 W less under rated load. This efficiency gap is meaningful for thermally constrained environments, although the Intel part targets a desktop segment where power limits are less restrictive.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD processor uses Radeon 660M graphics, while the Intel processor uses UHD Graphics 770. The database records no performance metrics for either iGPU, so a quantitative comparison is not possible. Both processors allow ECC memory support. The AMD processor has 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel processor has 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. The Intel PCIe interface is newer and offers higher per-lane bandwidth, but the AMD interface provides more total lanes. The Intel processor is unlocked? No, the multiplier is locked for both parts, so neither supports user overclocking.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel processor offers double the core count and double the thread count.

Q: What are the clock speed differences between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The Intel Core 5 223PTE has a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The AMD part runs faster at base, but the Intel part has a higher boost frequency.

Q: Which processor supports faster memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PTE supports 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports 76.8 GB/s. The Intel processor also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, whereas the AMD processor supports only DDR5.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the Intel Core 5 223PTE have ECC memory support enabled in their recorded specifications.

Q: What process nodes are used by each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 5 223PTE is built on a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD process node is smaller.

Q: What are the TDP ratings?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a TDP of 28 W. The Intel Core 5 223PTE has a TDP of 45 W. The AMD processor has a lower TDP by 17 W.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PTE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor has three times the L3 capacity.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the Rembrandt-R codename, while the Intel Core 5 223PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename. The AMD architecture is part of the Ryzen 3 generation with a Zen 3+ (Rembrandt) designation. The Intel architecture is part of the Core 5 generation with a Bartlett Lake designation. These are fundamentally different design families, one from AMD and one from Intel.

The process technology differs significantly. AMD uses a 6 nm node manufactured at TSMC. Intel uses a 10 nm node manufactured at its own foundry. The smaller 6 nm node gives the AMD processor a manufacturing advantage in transistor density and power efficiency. The Intel processor compensates with a larger physical design and higher power envelope.

The core microarchitecture differs in cache organization. The AMD processor has 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 cache per core. The Intel processor has 80 KB of L1 per core and 2 MB of L2 per core. The L3 cache is shared at 8 MB for the AMD processor and 24 MB for the Intel processor. The Intel cache design provides more data storage at every level. The AMD design uses a smaller per-core cache layout, which is typical for a lower-power mobile part.

The memory controller differs. The AMD processor supports DDR5 only, with a dual-channel memory bus. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also with a dual-channel memory bus. The Intel memory bandwidth is higher at 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s. The Intel processor also supports wider memory compatibility, which allows system builders to choose older DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 modules. The AMD processor is restricted to DDR5.

The PCIe interface differs. The AMD processor provides 20 lanes of PCIe Gen 4 from the CPU. The Intel processor provides 16 lanes of PCIe Gen 5 from the CPU. PCIe Gen 5 doubles the per-lane bandwidth of Gen 4, so the Intel controller offers higher throughput per lane despite having fewer lanes. The AMD controller offers more total lanes, which can support more simultaneous devices. The Intel processor is a desktop part with a Socket 1700 interface, while the AMD processor is a mobile part with an AMD Socket FP7 interface. The sockets are incompatible with each other.

The integrated graphics differ. The AMD processor includes Radeon 660M graphics. The Intel processor includes UHD Graphics 770. The database records no benchmark scores for either graphics solution, so no performance conclusion is possible. Both processors have locked multipliers, meaning neither supports overclocking. Both support ECC memory. The production status for both is active. The AMD processor has a die size of 210 mm², while the Intel die size is not recorded in the database. The AMD part number is 100-000000549 (FP7r2), and the Intel part number is SA4QL.

Specification Differences

The core count differs: AMD has 4 cores, Intel has 8 cores. The thread count differs: AMD has 8 threads, Intel has 16 threads. The base clock differs: AMD has 3.00 GHz, Intel has 2.30 GHz. The boost clock differs: AMD has 4.30 GHz, Intel has 5.40 GHz. The TDP differs: AMD has 28 W, Intel has 45 W. The socket differs: AMD uses AMD Socket FP7, Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. The architecture differs: AMD uses Zen 3+, Intel uses Bartlett Lake. The codename differs: AMD uses Rembrandt-R, Intel uses Bartlett Lake. The process node differs: AMD uses 6 nm, Intel uses 10 nm. The foundry differs: AMD uses TSMC, Intel uses Intel. The die size differs: AMD has 210 mm², Intel has no recorded value. The L1 cache differs: AMD has 64 KB per core, Intel has 80 KB per core. The L2 cache differs: AMD has 512 KB per core, Intel has 2 MB per core. The L3 cache differs: AMD has 8 MB shared, Intel has 24 MB shared. Memory support differs: AMD supports DDR5 only, Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth differs: AMD has 76.8 GB/s, Intel has 89.6 GB/s. PCIe differs: AMD has Gen 4 with 20 lanes, Intel has Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics differ: AMD has Radeon 660M, Intel has UHD Graphics 770. Market segment differs: AMD is Mobile, Intel is Desktop. Release date differs: AMD released on 2025-09-30, Intel released on 2026-03-08. The Intel processor has a launch MSRP of $232, while the AMD processor has no recorded launch MSRP. Both parts have locked multipliers, both support ECC memory, and both are active in production.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 223PTE wins in raw multi-threaded capability. Its 8 cores and 16 threads double the thread count of the AMD Ryzen 3 110. Its 24 MB L3 cache is three times larger. Its 2 MB per-core L2 cache is four times larger than the AMD per-core value. Its memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s exceeds the AMD 76.8 GB/s. Its boost clock of 5.40 GHz is higher than the AMD 4.30 GHz. These factors point to advantages in heavily threaded workloads, large data sets, and applications that scale with cache capacity. The PCIe Gen 5 interface also gives the Intel processor a newer I/O standard, which can benefit high-bandwidth expansion devices.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 wins in power efficiency. Its 28 W TDP is 17 W lower than the Intel 45 W TDP. Its 6 nm process node is smaller than the Intel 10 nm node. Its base clock of 3.00 GHz is higher than the Intel 2.30 GHz, which can help in lightly threaded tasks that run at base frequency. The AMD processor is a mobile part, so it is designed for power-constrained environments. Its 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes provide more total lanes than the Intel 16 lanes, which can support more simultaneous I/O devices. The AMD processor also has a smaller die size at 210 mm², though the Intel die size is not recorded for comparison.

The Intel processor wins in memory flexibility. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD processor supports only DDR5. This allows the Intel platform to use older, more widely available memory. The AMD processor wins in integrated graphics? The database records the GPU names but no performance data, so no win can be assigned. Both processors support ECC memory, so neither has an advantage there. Both have locked multipliers, so neither supports overclocking.

The Verdict

The data indicates the Intel Core 5 223PTE is the stronger processor for performance-oriented desktop workloads. It has double the cores, double the threads, a higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz, three times the L3 cache, four times the per-core L2 cache, and higher memory bandwidth. The 45 W TDP is appropriate for a desktop part. The launch MSRP of $232 places it in the mainstream desktop segment. The PCIe Gen 5 support and dual memory compatibility give it a more modern I/O and memory feature set. Workloads that use many threads, large cached data, or high-bandwidth memory will favor this processor based on the recorded specifications.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 is the better choice for power-sensitive mobile systems. Its 28 W TDP and 6 nm process node make it a lower-power part. The higher base clock of 3.00 GHz provides decent single-thread responsiveness at lower frequencies. The 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes offer more total I/O lanes. The Radeon 660M integrated graphics and mobile socket design align with thin-and-light laptop use. For users prioritizing battery life and thermal headroom, the AMD part is the more appropriate selection.

Neither processor has recorded benchmark scores in the database, so the analysis rests on specifications. The percentile ranking is identical at 50 for both. The average benchmark score is zero for both. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty. This means the conclusions are derived from architectural and specification comparisons, not measured performance. The Intel processor should deliver superior multi-threaded and peak-frequency performance. The AMD processor should deliver superior power efficiency and a smaller process node. The choice depends on the target platform: desktop for Intel, mobile for AMD.