AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core 5 223PE Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data splits these two processors cleanly by workload type and market intent. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 is a 4-core, 8-thread mobile chip built on TSMC's 6 nm process with a 28 W TDP, aimed at thin-and-light systems. The Intel Core 5 223PE is a desktop part with 8 cores, 16 threads, a 65 W TDP, and a 5.20 GHz boost clock. The benchmark database contains no recorded measurements for the AMD Ryzen 3 110, while the Intel Core 5 223PE has a full suite of scores. As a result, every benchmark comparison in this analysis is based on the Intel part's recorded performance and the AMD part's architectural positioning, not direct head-to-head measurements.

The Intel Core 5 223PE wins every workload category where data exists. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26455 reflects a processor with twice the core count and twice the thread count of the AMD part. The single-core Cinebench R23 result of 3734 also favors Intel, driven by a boost clock of 5.20 GHz versus 4.30 GHz. The gap is not uniform across all tests, but the direction is consistent: Intel holds the advantage in both parallel and lightly threaded workloads.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110's win condition is not performance per benchmark score, because no scores are recorded for it. Instead, its advantages appear in platform traits: a 28 W TDP versus 65 W, a 6 nm process versus 10 nm, and mobile packaging with AMD Socket FP7. The database indicates the AMD part targets the mobile segment, while the Intel part is explicitly a desktop processor. For systems where power draw and thermal envelope dominate the design brief, the AMD chip's recorded specifications are the differentiator.

The data also shows a massive gap in database percentile ranking. The Intel Core 5 223PE sits at the 87th percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 40585. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of 0, reflecting the absence of recorded benchmark data. The nearest rivals to the Intel chip are all within a narrow band: the Intel Core 7 253PE scores 40557 (0.1% behind), the Intel Xeon 6357P scores 40630 (0.1% ahead), the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H scores 40518 (0.2% behind), and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G scores 40718 (0.3% ahead). This cluster indicates the Intel Core 5 223PE sits in a tightly contested performance tier.

Architecture Differences

The two chips come from different foundries, different process nodes, and different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the codename Rembrandt-R, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 5 223PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The process node gap of 6 nm versus 10 nm gives AMD a density and efficiency advantage on paper, but the Intel chip compensates with a larger physical design in terms of core count and cache.

Core and thread counts differ substantially. The AMD part has 4 cores and 8 threads; the Intel part has 8 cores and 16 threads. This is a doubling of both metrics, which directly explains the multi-threaded benchmark advantages. Cache allocations also diverge. The AMD chip has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The Intel L3 cache is three times larger, and its per-core L2 is four times larger, which helps with data-heavy workloads.

Memory support differs in scope. The AMD part supports DDR5 only, with dual-channel access and a recorded bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, with a higher recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Both chips support ECC memory, which is unusual for their market segments and suggests industrial or edge-computing applications. PCIe capabilities also differ: the AMD chip uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel chip uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The interface generation favors Intel, but lane count favors AMD.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 carries a Radeon 660M, while the Intel Core 5 223PE carries UHD Graphics 730. The database does not include graphics benchmark scores for either, so the comparison rests on the listed GPU names and their implied positioning. The AMD Radeon 660M is a more capable integrated solution for mobile workloads, while Intel's UHD Graphics 730 is a basic desktop iGPU.

The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $232. The AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP in the database. The Intel part also has a higher TDP of 65 W, which is appropriate for a desktop socket with adequate cooling, while the AMD part's 28 W TDP suits a mobile chassis. The Intel chip's boost clock reaches 5.20 GHz, which is 0.90 GHz higher than the AMD chip's 4.30 GHz boost. Base clocks are close: 2.90 GHz for Intel versus 3.00 GHz for AMD.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head benchmark entries are absent from the database. The winsA and winsB fields are both zero, and the headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty. This means no same-test, same-condition comparison exists between the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the Intel Core 5 223PE. The analysis must instead rely on the Intel chip's absolute scores and the AMD chip's lack of recorded scores.

The Intel Core 5 223PE delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26455 and a single-core score of 3734. The ratio between these two, roughly 7.1 to 1, shows strong scaling from its 8-core, 16-thread configuration. The Cinebench R20 results follow the same pattern: 11111 multi-core and 1568 single-core. The older Cinebench R15 test shows 2666 multi-core and 376 single-core. All three Cinebench generations confirm consistent performance across both threaded and single-threaded execution.

The PassMark suite adds workload-specific detail. The multi-thread score is 31124, and the single-thread score is 4219. Integer math scores 99819, floating-point math scores 76468, and extended instructions score 24672. Data compression scores 346623, while data encryption scores 18448. Random string sorting scores 35798, physics scores 2493, and finding prime numbers scores 159. These numbers indicate the Intel chip's strongest areas are data compression, integer math, and floating-point math, while prime-number finding is a relative weak point.

Because the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmarks, its performance cannot be quantified against these figures. The database shows its percentile as 50 and its average benchmark score as 0. The Intel part's percentile of 87 and average score of 40585 place it firmly in the upper-middle tier of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals cluster within 0.3% of its score, meaning the Intel Core 5 223PE is not an outlier in its class; it trades blows with other midrange and upper-midrange parts.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PE boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 boosts to 4.30 GHz.

Q: Which chip supports more memory types?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PE supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 only.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a TDP of 28 W. The Intel Core 5 223PE has a TDP of 65 W.

Q: Does either chip support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the Intel Core 5 223PE support ECC memory.

Q: What does the database show for the AMD chip's benchmark scores?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmark scores. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile is 50. The Intel Core 5 223PE has a full benchmark suite with an average score of 40585.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in every major specification field recorded in the database. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses 4 cores and 8 threads; the Intel Core 5 223PE uses 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are 3.00 GHz for AMD and 2.90 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks are 4.30 GHz for AMD and 5.20 GHz for Intel. TDP is 28 W for AMD and 65 W for Intel.

Sockets differ: AMD uses Socket FP7, Intel uses Socket 1700. The AMD architecture is Zen 3+ with the Rembrandt-R codename; the Intel architecture field is null with the Bartlett Lake codename. The process node is 6 nm at TSMC for AMD and 10 nm at Intel for the Intel chip. Die size is 210 mm² for AMD and null for Intel.

Cache configurations diverge at every level. AMD has 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3. Intel has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. Memory support is DDR5 for AMD and DDR4 plus DDR5 for Intel. Memory bandwidth is 76.8 GB/s for AMD and 89.6 GB/s for Intel. PCIe is Gen 4 with 20 lanes for AMD and Gen 5 with 16 lanes for Intel.

Integrated graphics are Radeon 660M for AMD and UHD Graphics 730 for Intel. The AMD part is a mobile processor; the Intel part is a desktop processor. Release dates differ: the AMD chip is dated 2025-09-30, and the Intel chip is dated 2026-03-08. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $232; the AMD part has none recorded. Both parts are active in production, both are locked, and both support ECC memory.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split by use case. The Intel Core 5 223PE is the performance leader in every recorded benchmark category, with an 87th percentile ranking, an average score of 40585, and a multi-core Cinebench R23 result of 26455. It offers double the cores, double the threads, a higher boost clock, larger caches, and broader memory support. Any workload that benefits from parallel execution, large L3 cache, or high single-thread frequency will favor this chip. Its nearest rivals sit within 0.3% of its average score, indicating it is competitively placed in its performance tier.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 is the efficiency leader. Its 28 W TDP is less than half of the Intel part's 65 W, and its 6 nm TSMC process is smaller than Intel's 10 nm node. It is a mobile chip on Socket FP7 with a Radeon 660M iGPU, designed for systems where power and thermal limits matter more than raw throughput. The database records no benchmark scores for it, so its performance cannot be verified, but its specifications indicate a balanced 4-core design for portable use.

There is no scenario in the recorded data where the AMD chip wins a performance benchmark, because no AMD benchmark data exists. The selection between the two comes down to platform. For desktop systems with adequate cooling and a need for multi-threaded throughput, the Intel Core 5 223PE is the only option with measured performance. For mobile systems with a 28 W envelope, the AMD Ryzen 3 110 is the only option in this pairing. The database does not support a recommendation beyond those boundaries.