AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core 5 221TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 5 221TE holds a decisive advantage across every recorded benchmark category, with no wins registered for the AMD Ryzen 3 110 in the head-to-head data. The database shows Intel's processor delivering substantially higher scores in all measured workloads, reflecting its larger core and thread configuration.

In Cinebench testing, the Intel Core 5 221TE scores 1139 in R15 multi-core, 4748 in R20 multi-core, and 11305 in R23 multi-core. The single-core results tell a similar story: 160 in R15, 670 in R20, and 1596 in R23. These figures indicate strong scaling from the 10-core, 16-thread design, with the R23 multi-core result particularly impressive for a processor with a 45 W TDP envelope.

PassMark results reinforce the multi-threaded dominance. The Intel processor records 13301 in multithread performance, 42303 in integer math, 31661 in floating-point math, and 156682 in data compression. The data encryption score of 8963 and extended instructions score of 9655 further demonstrate the breadth of its computational strengths. Single-thread performance in PassMark registers at 1734, with physics at 977 and random string sorting at 16929.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, meaning the comparison is entirely one-sided. Its 4-core, 8-thread configuration with a 3.00 GHz base clock and 4.30 GHz boost clock suggests it would compete in lower-intensity workloads, but without measured results, the data cannot substantiate any specific performance claims. The Intel part's 71st percentile ranking among all CPUs, compared to the AMD part's 50th percentile, places the Core 5 221TE firmly in the upper-middle tier of processors while the Ryzen 3 110 sits at the median.

The Intel Core 5 221TE's average benchmark score of 17860 places it within a close cluster of rivals. It trails the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT by 0.2% (17891 score) and the Intel Core 5 120U by 0.2% (17898 score), while leading the Intel Core 7 350 by 0.5% (17779 score) and the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 by 0.7% (17994 score). These narrow deltas indicate the Core 5 221TE delivers performance comparable to established mid-range desktop processors, a notable achievement given its 45 W TDP.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge fundamentally in their construction. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses TSMC's 6 nm process node with a 210 mm² die size, while the Intel Core 5 221TE uses Intel's 10 nm process with a slightly larger 215 mm² die. Both are active production parts, but the process technology difference favors AMD in terms of density and efficiency potential.

The core configurations could not be more different. AMD provides 4 cores and 8 threads, while Intel offers 10 cores and 16 threads, a 2.5x core advantage and 2x thread advantage for Intel. The Ryzen 3 110 operates with a 3.00 GHz base clock and 4.30 GHz boost clock, whereas the Core 5 221TE runs at a lower 1.80 GHz base but boosts to 5.00 GHz. The higher Intel boost clock partially compensates for the lower base frequency, though the significant core count disparity remains the primary differentiator.

Cache hierarchies reflect these architectural choices. The AMD part uses 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3. Intel's design provides 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3, a 3x L3 advantage. The larger Intel caches align with its higher core count and desktop-oriented design.

Memory support differs notably. AMD supports only DDR5 with dual-channel operation and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth, plus ECC capability. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel with identical 76.8 GB/s bandwidth and ECC. The Intel flexibility allows platform choices that AMD cannot offer.

PCIe connectivity separates the two as well. AMD provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The Intel implementation supports newer, faster PCIe devices, though with fewer lanes available.

Integrated graphics differentiate the parts. AMD pairs with Radeon 660M, while Intel includes UHD Graphics 730. Both are suitable for basic display output, though the database does not include comparative graphics benchmark data.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 221TE wins in every measured category. Its 10 cores and 16 threads dominate multi-threaded workloads, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11305 and PassMark multithread score of 13301. Content creation, video encoding, software compilation, and scientific computing tasks that scale across cores will favor this processor heavily.

Single-thread performance also belongs to Intel, with a 5.00 GHz boost clock and PassMark single-thread score of 1734. Applications relying on high per-core performance, such as older games, legacy software, or lightly threaded productivity tools, will benefit from this advantage, though the margin over the AMD part remains unquantified due to missing Ryzen benchmarks.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 cannot claim a single recorded win in the database. Its 28 W TDP and 6 nm process suggest efficiency advantages in thermally constrained environments, and the Radeon 660M integrated graphics may offer better iGPU performance than Intel's UHD Graphics 730, but no benchmark data validates these expectations. The 50th percentile ranking indicates median performance, and the database records no head-to-head wins for this processor.

The Intel part's 71st percentile ranking and average score of 17860 place it among capable mid-range desktop processors. Its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 3600XT and Core 5 120U, sit within 0.2% of its score, confirming the Core 5 221TE's position in a tightly contested performance tier.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 221TE has 10 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 221TE boosts to 5.00 GHz. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 boosts to 4.30 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: The Intel Core 5 221TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports only DDR5.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses a 6 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Core 5 221TE uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Q: Which processor has a higher Cinebench R23 multi-core score?

A: The Intel Core 5 221TE scores 11305 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded Cinebench score in the database.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for these processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a 28 W TDP. The Intel Core 5 221TE has a 45 W TDP.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 110 | Intel Core 5 221TE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 10 |

| Threads | 8 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 3.00 GHz | 1.80 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.30 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Not specified |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Bartlett Lake |

| Generation | Ryzen 3 (Zen 3+ Rembrandt) | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) |

| Process Node | 6 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| Die Size | 210 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB shared | 24 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 660M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2025-09-30 | 2025-01-12 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $232 |

| Part Number | 100-000000549 (FP7r2) | SRVQS |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 50 | 71 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 17860 |

The Verdict

The Intel Core 5 221TE is the clear choice for anyone seeking measured performance. The database records 17860 average benchmark score for Intel against 0 for AMD, with the Intel part winning every available test. Its 10 cores, 16 threads, 24 MB L3 cache, and 5.00 GHz boost clock deliver class-leading multi-threaded throughput, confirmed by the 11305 Cinebench R23 multi-core result and 13301 PassMark multithread score.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 targets a different use case entirely. As a mobile processor with 28 W TDP, 6 nm process, and Socket FP7, it suits thin-and-light laptops where power efficiency matters more than raw compute. The 4-core configuration with 8 MB L3 cache offers adequate performance for everyday tasks, and DDR5 support with ECC adds modern memory features. The Radeon 660M integrated graphics may provide a better iGPU experience than Intel's UHD Graphics 730, though no benchmark data confirms this.

For desktop builds requiring serious processing power, the Intel Core 5 221TE's 71st percentile ranking and proximity to the Ryzen 5 3600XT (0.2% difference) and Core 5 120U (0.2% difference) establish it as a competitive mid-range option. The 45 W TDP is manageable for desktop cooling solutions, and the Socket 1700 platform offers broad motherboard compatibility.

The AMD part's 50th percentile ranking places it at the median of all CPUs, suggesting balanced but unremarkable performance. Without benchmark scores in the database, its actual capabilities remain unverified. The absence of any head-to-head wins for the Ryzen 3 110 means users prioritizing measured performance should select the Intel Core 5 221TE. Those constrained by power budgets in mobile chassis may still consider the Ryzen 3 110 for its efficiency profile, but the data currently available does not support a performance-based argument in its favor.