AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core 3 304 Comparison

# Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains benchmark results for only one of these two processors: the Intel Core 3 304. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no benchmark entries in the database, which limits direct numerical comparisons. However, the Intel Core 3 304's results can be examined against its nearest rivals to establish a performance baseline.

The Intel Core 3 304 achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 5263 and a single-core score of 1765. In Cinebench R20, it records 4160 multicore and 587 single-core. The older Cinebench R15 test shows 849 multicore and 264 single-core. These results place the processor in the 68th percentile of all CPUs in the database.

PassMark results for the Intel Core 3 304 include a multithread score of 11625 and a single-thread score of 3614. The data compression test produces 114775, while data encryption reaches 8501. Extended instruction performance scores 9686, floating-point math scores 29722, and integer math scores 24640. The processor finds prime numbers with a score of 68, completes random string sorting at 13659, and posts 868 in the physics test.

The Intel Core 3 304's average benchmark score sits at 13745. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, records an average score of 13786, which places the Intel part 0.3% behind that processor. The Intel Core i7-8750H scores 13868, putting the Core 3 304 0.9% behind. The AMD EPYC 7443 reaches 13936, a 1.4% gap. Conversely, the Intel Core 3 304 sits 1.1% ahead of the Intel Core 5 120UL, which scores 13594.

Because the AMD Ryzen 3 110 lacks benchmark entries, the head-to-head comparison cannot rely on measured scores. The database records zero wins for each processor in direct comparisons. This absence of data means the analysis must focus on architectural specifications and the available performance profile of the Intel Core 3 304.

# Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge substantially in their underlying designs. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the codename Rembrandt-R, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core 3 304 uses the Wildcat Lake codename with a 3 nm process produced by Intel foundries. The fabrication node difference suggests the Intel part employs a more advanced manufacturing technology, though no transistor counts are recorded for either chip.

Core configurations differ notably. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 provides 4 cores with 8 threads, indicating simultaneous multithreading support. The Intel Core 3 304 provides 5 cores with 5 threads, meaning each core handles exactly one thread. The Intel processor offers one additional physical core, while the AMD processor offers three additional threads through its multithreading capability.

Clock speeds show contrasting profiles. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The Intel Core 3 304 has a base clock of 1.50 GHz and an identical boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The AMD processor sustains a much higher base frequency, while both reach the same maximum boost.

Cache hierarchies differ substantially. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 allocates 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 cache per core, with 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 3 304 provides 192 KB of L1 cache total, 2.5 MB of L2 cache total, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD design offers more L3 capacity, while the Intel design consolidates smaller cache amounts across fewer threads.

Memory architecture separates the two clearly. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s and includes ECC support. The Intel Core 3 304 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a single-channel bus with a bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s and lacks ECC support. The AMD processor delivers 28.6% more memory bandwidth on paper and adds ECC functionality.

PCI Express connectivity also differs. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The Intel Core 3 304 provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes from the CPU. The AMD processor offers significantly more PCIe lanes for expansion.

Integrated graphics use different solutions. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 includes Radeon 660M graphics. The Intel Core 3 304 includes Intel Xe3 Graphics with one Xe core. Both targets the mobile segment, and both use locked multipliers.

The thermal design power differs by 13 watts: the AMD Ryzen 3 110 is rated at 28 W, while the Intel Core 3 304 is rated at 15 W. The Intel chip consumes less power by specification, which aligns with its lower base clock and single-channel memory design.

Release timing places the AMD Ryzen 3 110 with a release date of September 30, 2025, while the Intel Core 3 304 has a release date of April 15, 2026. Both are marked as active production parts.

# FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 3 304 has 5 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores.

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 8 threads, while the Intel Core 3 304 has 5 threads. The AMD part uses simultaneous multithreading to double its core count in thread terms.

Q: What is the boost clock for each processor?

A: Both processors reach a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 starts from a 3.00 GHz base clock, while the Intel Core 3 304 starts from a 1.50 GHz base clock.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 3 304 does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 provides 76.8 GB/s over a dual-channel DDR5 bus. The Intel Core 3 304 provides 59.7 GB/s over a single-channel bus that supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

Q: How does the Intel Core 3 304 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core 3 304's average benchmark score of 13745 places it 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, 0.9% behind the Intel Core i7-8750H, 1.4% behind the AMD EPYC 7443, and 1.1% ahead of the Intel Core 5 120UL.

# Specification Differences

The two processors differ in the following recorded fields:

Process Node: AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses 6 nm (TSMC); Intel Core 3 304 uses 3 nm (Intel).

Cores: AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores; Intel Core 3 304 has 5 cores.

Threads: AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 8 threads; Intel Core 3 304 has 5 threads.

Base Clock: AMD Ryzen 3 110 runs at 3.00 GHz; Intel Core 3 304 runs at 1.50 GHz.

Boost Clock: Both run at 4.30 GHz, so no difference here.

TDP: AMD Ryzen 3 110 is rated at 28 W; Intel Core 3 304 is rated at 15 W.

Socket: AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses AMD Socket FP7; Intel Core 3 304 uses Intel BGA 1516.

Codename: AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses Rembrandt-R; Intel Core 3 304 uses Wildcat Lake.

L1 Cache: AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 64 KB per core; Intel Core 3 304 has 192 KB total.

L2 Cache: AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 512 KB per core; Intel Core 3 304 has 2.5 MB total.

L3 Cache: AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 8 MB shared; Intel Core 3 304 has 6 MB shared.

Memory Support: AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5; Intel Core 3 304 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

Memory Bus: AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses dual-channel; Intel Core 3 304 uses single-channel.

Memory Bandwidth: AMD Ryzen 3 110 provides 76.8 GB/s; Intel Core 3 304 provides 59.7 GB/s.

ECC Memory: Supported on AMD Ryzen 3 110; not supported on Intel Core 3 304.

PCIe Lanes: AMD Ryzen 3 110 provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes; Intel Core 3 304 provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes.

Integrated Graphics: AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses Radeon 660M; Intel Core 3 304 uses Intel Xe3 Graphics (1 Xe).

Release Date: AMD Ryzen 3 110 released September 30, 2025; Intel Core 3 304 released April 15, 2026.

Launch MSRP: The Intel Core 3 304 has a launch MSRP of $309. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no launch MSRP recorded.

Die Size: AMD Ryzen 3 110 records a die size of 210 mm²; no die size is recorded for Intel Core 3 304.

Benchmark Percentile: AMD Ryzen 3 110 sits at the 50th percentile of all CPUs with no benchmark scores. Intel Core 3 304 sits at the 68th percentile with an average benchmark score of 13745.

# The Verdict

The database contains asymmetric information for these two processors. The Intel Core 3 304 has a complete benchmark profile with an average score of 13745, placing it at the 68th percentile of all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile by default, which reflects a lack of recorded data rather than measured performance.

From a specification standpoint, the AMD Ryzen 3 110 offers advantages in multithreading, memory bandwidth, ECC support, and PCIe lane count. Its 8 threads against 5 threads gives it a theoretical edge in heavily threaded workloads. The dual-channel memory bus with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth compared to 59.7 GB/s on the Intel part suggests better memory throughput. ECC support and 20 PCIe lanes make it more suitable for reliability-focused or expansion-heavy configurations.

The Intel Core 3 304 offers advantages in physical core count, manufacturing process, and power efficiency. Its 5 cores provide more parallel physical execution units, even without multithreading. The 3 nm process node indicates a more advanced fabrication technology than the 6 nm node used by AMD. The 15 W TDP versus 28 W TDP points to lower power consumption, which matters in mobile designs.

The benchmark data for the Intel Core 3 304 shows it performing within 1.4% of the AMD EPYC 7443 and 0.9% of the Intel Core i7-8750H, while leading the Intel Core 5 120UL by 1.1%. These margins are small, indicating the Intel Core 3 304 sits in a competitive performance band relative to those established processors.

For the AMD Ryzen 3 110, the absence of benchmark data means the verdict cannot rest on measured performance. The specification comparison suggests it targets a different set of priorities: more threads, wider memory, ECC, and more PCIe connectivity. The Intel Core 3 304 targets efficiency with fewer threads, newer process technology, and lower power draw.

# Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 wins in scenarios that benefit from multithreading. Its 8 threads double the thread count of the Intel Core 3 304, which helps in workloads that scale with thread availability. The dual-channel memory bus at 76.8 GB/s provides a bandwidth advantage over the Intel part's 59.7 GB/s, which matters for memory-intensive operations.

ECC memory support on the AMD Ryzen 3 110 gives it an edge in environments where data integrity is critical, such as error-sensitive computing tasks. The 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes versus 6 lanes on the Intel part allows for more attached devices or expansion options in a mobile platform.

The Intel Core 3 304 wins in efficiency-oriented scenarios. Its 15 W TDP compared to 28 W indicates lower power consumption, which extends battery life in mobile systems. The 5 physical cores provide additional parallel execution units for workloads that prefer more cores over more threads per core.

The Intel Core 3 304's measured benchmark results confirm its competitive standing. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 5263 and single-core score of 1765, along with a PassMark multithread score of 11625, provide a concrete performance profile. The 68th percentile ranking places it above the default 50th percentile assigned to the AMD Ryzen 3 110, though that ranking reflects missing data rather than measured inferiority.

The Intel Core 3 304 also supports LPDDR5X memory in addition to DDR5, which the AMD Ryzen 3 110 does not. This adds flexibility for system designers choosing memory types. The newer release date of April 2026 versus September 2025 suggests the Intel part comes from a later design cycle.

In direct specification terms, the AMD Ryzen 3 110 leads in thread count, memory bandwidth, ECC support, PCIe lane count, L3 cache capacity, and base clock speed. The Intel Core 3 304 leads in physical core count, process node efficiency, TDP, memory type flexibility, and benchmark percentile. Users prioritizing multithreading, memory throughput, and expansion capability would favor the AMD design. Users prioritizing power efficiency, physical core count, and verified benchmark performance would favor the Intel design.