AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core 3 201TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and Intel Core 3 201TE contains no head-to-head benchmark entries. Neither processor has an average benchmark score, and the head-to-head benchmark list is empty. The database indicates zero wins for each processor in direct comparisons. This means the two CPUs cannot be ranked against one another using measured performance data at this time.

The absence of benchmark scores is notable because both processors occupy the 50th percentile against all CPUs in the database. That percentile ranking places them in the middle of the overall performance distribution, but without actual scores, the percentile alone does not reveal how close they are to each other. The data shows both parts are statistically centered in the broader CPU landscape, yet the margin between them remains unquantified.

What the data does show is that the Intel Core 3 201TE has a higher boost clock of 4.60 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 110's 4.30 GHz. In single-threaded workloads that scale with frequency, the Intel part would typically have an advantage based on that 0.30 GHz difference. Conversely, the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a higher base clock of 3.00 GHz versus the Intel chip's 2.90 GHz, which may benefit sustained workloads that rely on base frequency operation. These clock differences are the only measurable performance indicators available, and they point in opposite directions depending on the workload type.

Where Each One Wins

Without benchmark scores, the win analysis comes from architectural and feature differences recorded in the database. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses a 6 nm process node from TSMC, while the Intel Core 3 201TE uses a 10 nm process node from Intel. The smaller process node gives the AMD part a potential efficiency advantage in power-constrained scenarios. The AMD processor has a thermal design power of 28 watts, while the Intel processor has a TDP of 45 watts. The data shows the AMD part consumes less power by specification, which suggests it is better suited for thermally limited environments.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 integrates a Radeon 660M graphics solution. The Intel Core 3 201TE integrates UHD Graphics 730. Neither graphics solution has benchmark scores in the database, so a direct comparison of their graphical performance is not possible. However, the presence of integrated graphics on both parts means neither requires a discrete GPU for basic display output.

The Intel Core 3 201TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, whereas the AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 only. For users with existing DDR4 memory infrastructure, the Intel part offers more flexibility. Both processors support dual-channel memory and have an identical memory bandwidth figure of 76.8 GB/s. Both also support ECC memory, which is relevant for error-sensitive computing tasks.

The Intel processor has a PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes, while the AMD processor has PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. The Intel part offers a newer PCIe generation, which provides higher bandwidth per lane for compatible devices. The AMD part offers more total lanes, which may benefit systems with many expansion devices.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 is classified as a mobile processor using the AMD Socket FP7. The Intel Core 3 201TE is classified as a desktop processor using the Intel Socket 1700. This distinction determines which platforms each CPU can be installed into, and it is a fundamental difference that cannot be bridged by any performance consideration.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the Rembrandt-R codename. The Intel Core 3 201TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, with no specific architecture name listed in the database. Both processors have 4 cores and 8 threads, so parallel thread count is identical.

Cache configurations differ significantly between the two parts. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 3 201TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has more cache at every level: 25% more L1 per core, 144% more L2 per core, and 50% more L3 in total. Larger caches can reduce memory latency and improve performance in cache-sensitive workloads, though the database does not include benchmark data to confirm the impact.

The process node difference is substantial. The AMD processor is fabricated on a 6 nm process by TSMC. The Intel processor is fabricated on a 10 nm process by Intel. The die sizes also differ: the AMD chip measures 210 mm², while the Intel chip measures 163 mm². Despite being on a smaller process node, the AMD die is physically larger, which suggests differences in on-die component integration.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a release date of September 30, 2025. The Intel Core 3 201TE has a release date of January 12, 2025. The Intel part was released earlier by approximately nine months. Both processors are marked as Active in production status.

The AMD processor uses the Zen 3+ generation, and the Intel processor uses the Bartlett Lake generation. The AMD part has a part number of 100-000000549(FP7r2), and the Intel part has a part number of SRPKDQ5CK. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so both are locked for overclocking.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: Both processors have exactly 4 cores and 8 threads. There is no difference in core or thread count.

Q: What are the clock speed differences between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The Intel Core 3 201TE has a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The AMD part has a higher base clock by 0.10 GHz, while the Intel part has a higher boost clock by 0.30 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the Intel Core 3 201TE have ECC memory support enabled.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 memory only. The Intel Core 3 201TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a TDP of 28 watts. The Intel Core 3 201TE has a TDP of 45 watts.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE has 12 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has 50% more L3 cache.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in the following recorded fields:

• Base Clock: AMD Ryzen 3 110 at 3.00 GHz, Intel Core 3 201TE at 2.90 GHz
• Boost Clock: AMD Ryzen 3 110 at 4.30 GHz, Intel Core 3 201TE at 4.60 GHz
• TDP: AMD Ryzen 3 110 at 28 watts, Intel Core 3 201TE at 45 watts
• Socket: AMD Socket FP7 versus Intel Socket 1700
• Architecture: Zen 3+ for AMD, none listed for Intel
• Codename: Rembrandt-R versus Bartlett Lake
• Process Node: 6 nm TSMC versus 10 nm Intel
• Die Size: 210 mm² for AMD, 163 mm² for Intel
• L1 Cache: 64 KB per core for AMD, 80 KB per core for Intel
• L2 Cache: 512 KB per core for AMD, 1.25 MB per core for Intel
• L3 Cache: 8 MB shared for AMD, 12 MB shared for Intel
• Memory Support: DDR5 for AMD, DDR4 and DDR5 for Intel
• PCIe: Gen 4 with 20 lanes for AMD, Gen 5 with 16 lanes for Intel
• Integrated Graphics: Radeon 660M for AMD, UHD Graphics 730 for Intel
• Market Segment: Mobile for AMD, Desktop for Intel
• Release Date: September 30, 2025 for AMD, January 12, 2025 for Intel
• Launch MSRP: The Intel Core 3 201TE has a launch MSRP of $134. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no launch MSRP listed.
• Part Number: 100-000000549(FP7r2) for AMD, SRPKDQ5CK for Intel

Fields that are the same include core count (4), thread count (8), memory bus (dual-channel), memory bandwidth (76.8 GB/s), ECC support (true), multiplier unlock status (false), production status (Active), and percentile vs all CPUs (50 for both).

The Verdict

The database contains no benchmark scores for either processor, so a performance verdict cannot be derived from measured results. The selection between the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and Intel Core 3 201TE must instead rest on the recorded specification differences.

The Intel Core 3 201TE is the stronger choice on paper for single-threaded burst workloads due to its 4.60 GHz boost clock, which is 0.30 GHz higher than the AMD part. It also has larger caches at every level, including 12 MB of L3 cache versus 8 MB, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, making it more flexible for platform memory choices. The Intel part provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 16 lanes, which is a newer standard than the AMD part's PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. It is a desktop processor with a launch MSRP of $134.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 is the better choice for power-constrained environments. Its 28 watt TDP is 17 watts lower than the Intel part's 45 watt TDP. It uses a smaller 6 nm process node, which is consistent with lower power consumption. Its higher base clock of 3.00 GHz may help in sustained workloads that operate at base frequency. It offers 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is four more lanes than the Intel part, and it is classified as a mobile processor, indicating it is designed for portable systems.

Users building a desktop system with flexibility in memory choice and a preference for maximum boost frequency would select the Intel Core 3 201TE based on the recorded specifications. Users building a mobile or low-power system with a need for lower thermal output would select the AMD Ryzen 3 110. The data does not support a performance ranking between the two, so the decision defaults to platform fit and power requirements.