AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Arc G3 EXTREME Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains a complete set of scores for the Intel Arc G3 EXTREME, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmark results in the database. This asymmetry means the head-to-head comparison is entirely one-sided in terms of measured data. The Intel part holds a percentile rank of 85 among all CPUs tracked in the database, while the AMD part sits at the 50th percentile. This places the Intel Arc G3 EXTREME firmly in the upper tier of mobile processors, whereas the AMD Ryzen 3 110 occupies a middle-ground position based on its specifications alone.

The Intel Arc G3 EXTREME delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14,655 points, which represents a strong result for a mobile processor with a 25 W TDP. The single-core result in the same test reaches 1,862 points. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 10,945 points, and the single-core score is 1,545 points. The older Cinebench R15 workload yields 2,192 points in multi-core and 267 points in single-core. These scores show a consistent scaling pattern across the three Cinebench versions, with the multi-core figures dominating the single-core results by a factor of roughly 8 to 9, which is typical for a processor with 14 threads.

The PassMark suite adds further detail. The multithread score is 30,659 points, while the single-thread score is 4,293 points. The integer math test produces 71,164 points, and the floating-point math test produces 86,929 points. Data compression scores 307,094 points, while data encryption scores 23,881 points. Extended instructions reach 24,017 points. The find prime numbers test returns 248 points, and random string sorting returns 37,331 points. Physics simulation scores 2,515 points.

The nearest rivals in the database provide context for these numbers. The Intel Arc G3 EXTREME has an average benchmark score of 36,699 points. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 averages 36,938 points, which is 0.6 percent higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F averages 36,945 points, which is 0.7 percent higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D averages 37,018 points, which is 0.9 percent higher. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 averages 37,093 points, which is 1.1 percent higher. The Arc G3 EXTREME trails all four rivals, but the gaps are narrow, ranging from 0.6 to 1.1 percent. In practical terms, this places the Intel part in a tightly contested cluster where any of these processors could trade places depending on the specific workload.

The data shows that the Intel Arc G3 EXTREME is competitive with these established desktop and mobile parts despite its mobile form factor and lower TDP. The 25 W power envelope is notably efficient given the measured performance. The AMD Ryzen 3 110, by contrast, has no benchmark entries, so the database cannot confirm its actual performance. Its specifications suggest a capable processor, but the absence of measured results prevents any quantitative comparison.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 3 110 have any recorded benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen 3 110. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and it has no nearest rival entries. The Intel Arc G3 EXTREME has 17 recorded benchmark scores across Cinebench and PassMark workloads.

Q: How does the Intel Arc G3 EXTREME compare to its closest rivals in the database?

A: The Intel Arc G3 EXTREME has an average benchmark score of 36,699 points. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 scores 36,938 points (0.6 percent higher), the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F scores 36,945 points (0.7 percent higher), the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D scores 37,018 points (0.9 percent higher), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores 37,093 points (1.1 percent higher). The Arc G3 EXTREME sits at the lower end of this group, but all four rivals are within 1.1 percent of each other.

Q: What is the difference in core and thread counts between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel Arc G3 EXTREME has 14 cores and 14 threads. The Intel part has 10 more cores and 6 more threads than the AMD part.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Arc G3 EXTREME has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The base clocks are 1.90 GHz for the Intel part and 3.00 GHz for the AMD part.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for these processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a TDP of 28 W, and the Intel Arc G3 EXTREME has a TDP of 25 W. The Intel part has a lower power envelope despite having more cores and a higher boost clock.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports ECC memory. The Intel Arc G3 EXTREME does not support ECC memory.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc G3 EXTREME wins in every measured benchmark category because it is the only one of the two with recorded data. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14,655 points indicates strong performance for heavily threaded workloads such as video rendering, 3D scene compilation, and physics simulation. The single-core score of 1,862 points in the same test shows competitive performance for tasks that rely on a single thread, such as legacy application compatibility or lightly threaded productivity software. The PassMark multithread score of 30,659 points reinforces the multi-core strength, while the single-thread score of 4,293 points confirms that individual core performance is solid.

The integer math score of 71,164 points and floating-point math score of 86,929 points suggest that the processor handles both general-purpose arithmetic and scientific calculations effectively. The floating-point advantage over integer math is about 22 percent, which points to a design well suited to workloads that use vectorized instructions. The extended instructions score of 24,017 points covers newer instruction sets that accelerate multimedia and encryption tasks. The data compression score of 307,094 points is particularly high, indicating strong throughput for archiving, database operations, and file system workloads that involve large amounts of data movement. Data encryption at 23,881 points shows moderate but capable performance for security-related tasks.

The find prime numbers score of 248 points is low in absolute terms, but this is a notoriously difficult workload for any processor, and the score reflects the computational complexity of prime number generation rather than a specific weakness. Random string sorting at 37,331 points demonstrates good performance for text processing and data sorting tasks. Physics simulation at 2,515 points provides a baseline for gaming physics and scientific simulations.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no wins in the benchmark database because no scores exist. Its specifications suggest it would be competitive in single-threaded tasks given its 4.30 GHz boost clock, but the database cannot confirm this. The 8 MB shared L3 cache and 6 nm process node indicate a modern design, but without measured results, no performance claim can be made.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field in the database. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Arc G3 EXTREME uses 14 cores and 14 threads. The AMD part has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 1.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The TDP is 28 W for the AMD part and 25 W for the Intel part.

The socket types are entirely different. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel Arc G3 EXTREME uses Intel BGA 2540. The AMD processor is built on a 6 nm process node from TSMC, while the Intel processor uses a 3 nm node from Intel. The die size is 210 mm² for the AMD part, while no die size is recorded for the Intel part.

Cache configurations differ substantially. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Arc G3 EXTREME has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has more than double the L3 cache of the AMD part.

Memory support differs as well. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel Arc G3 EXTREME supports LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s. The Intel part has nearly double the memory bandwidth. ECC memory is supported by the AMD part but not by the Intel part.

PCIe connectivity differs. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the Intel Arc G3 EXTREME has Gen 5 with 4 lanes. The AMD part provides more lanes, but the Intel part offers a newer PCIe generation. Integrated graphics also differ: the AMD part uses Radeon 660M, while the Intel part uses Arc B390.

The release dates differ by roughly eight months. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 was released on September 30, 2025, while the Intel Arc G3 EXTREME was released on May 27, 2026. Both processors are marked as Active in production status. Neither processor has a launch MSRP recorded in the database. Both have locked multipliers. The part numbers are 100-000000549(FP7r2) for the AMD part and SA4R3 for the Intel part.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the Rembrandt-R codename, belonging to the Ryzen 3 generation. The Intel Arc G3 EXTREME uses the Panther Lake codename under the Arc G3 generation, with no specific architecture name recorded. The AMD processor is built on a 6 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel processor uses a 3 nm process from Intel.

The core count disparity is the most significant architectural difference. The AMD part has 4 cores with simultaneous multithreading, giving 8 threads. The Intel part has 14 cores but only 14 threads, meaning it does not use simultaneous multithreading. This gives the Intel part more physical cores but no thread doubling. The higher base clock of the AMD part at 3.00 GHz versus 1.90 GHz for the Intel part suggests that the AMD cores are designed for higher per-core frequency at lower core counts. The Intel part compensates with a higher boost clock of 4.70 GHz and a larger core count.

The cache hierarchy reflects different design philosophies. The AMD part provides 64 KB of L1 per core, which is typical for a Zen-based design. The Intel part provides 192 KB of L1 per core, which is substantially larger. The L2 cache is 512 KB per core for AMD and 2.5 MB per core for Intel, a fivefold difference. The shared L3 cache is 8 MB for the AMD part and 18 MB for the Intel part. These differences indicate that the Intel part is designed to keep more data closer to the cores, which benefits workloads with large working sets.

The memory architecture also differs. The AMD part supports DDR5 with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Intel part supports LPDDR5X with a bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s. The Intel part's higher bandwidth is particularly relevant for integrated graphics performance, as the GPU shares the same memory bus. The integrated graphics differ as well: the AMD part uses Radeon 660M, while the Intel part uses Arc B390. The Intel part's newer Arc graphics architecture and higher memory bandwidth likely provide better integrated GPU performance, though no direct benchmark data exists for either iGPU.

The PCIe implementation differs in both generation and lane count. The AMD part provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes, which allows for multiple high-bandwidth devices such as discrete GPUs and NVMe drives. The Intel part provides Gen 5 with only 4 lanes, which limits expansion but provides very high per-lane bandwidth for a single device. This suggests that the Intel part is designed for a more integrated mobile platform where expansion is less critical.

The AMD part includes ECC memory support, which is unusual for a mobile processor and indicates a possible positioning toward entry-level workstation or server-adjacent workloads. The Intel part does not support ECC, aligning with a consumer-focused mobile design. The AMD part has a 210 mm² die size, while no die size is recorded for the Intel part. The process node difference, 6 nm versus 3 nm, gives the Intel part a potential density and efficiency advantage, though the AMD part's lower core count reduces the impact of its larger node.

Both processors are mobile segments, use dual-channel memory buses, and have locked multipliers. Neither has a vCache3d option recorded. The production status for both is Active, and both have no launch MSRP in the database. The overall architecture comparison shows two divergent approaches: the AMD part prioritizes higher base clocks and ECC support in a compact 4-core design, while the Intel part prioritizes core count, cache capacity, memory bandwidth, and a smaller process node in a 14-core design without simultaneous multithreading.