AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X. Both processors have an empty benchmark array, meaning no direct comparison scores, no average benchmark scores, and no win counts are available. The winsA and winsB fields are both zero, confirming that no measurement data has been logged for either part in a direct matchup.

The absence of recorded scores does not diminish the value of comparing the two processors, but it does limit the analysis to architectural specifications and known performance characteristics. The Ryzen 3 110 posts a percentile of 50 against all CPUs, and the Ryzen Embedded 9600X also posts a percentile of 50. These equal percentile values indicate that, within the database's current classification, both processors sit at the median of all recorded CPUs. Without raw benchmark numbers, the percentile field alone cannot differentiate performance between them.

The Ryzen Embedded 9600X carries a higher core and thread count, 6 cores and 12 threads versus 4 cores and 8 threads on the Ryzen 3 110. That 2-core and 4-thread advantage suggests a meaningful uplift in multi-threaded workloads, though no benchmark confirms the magnitude. The Ryzen Embedded 9600X also boosts to 5.40 GHz, while the Ryzen 3 110 boosts to 4.30 GHz, a 1.10 GHz difference in maximum clock speed. Base clocks differ as well, with the Embedded part starting at 3.90 GHz and the Ryzen 3 110 starting at 3.00 GHz, a 0.90 GHz gap.

On cache capacity, the Ryzen Embedded 9600X holds a significant lead. It features 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3. The Ryzen 3 110 features 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. Per-core L2 doubles from 512 KB to 1 MB, and shared L3 quadruples from 8 MB to 32 MB. These cache deltas typically translate into better performance in cache-sensitive workloads, though no benchmark data confirms the effect here.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen Embedded 9600X wins on raw computational resource counts. It has 6 cores versus 4, 12 threads versus 8, a higher base clock by 0.90 GHz, and a higher boost clock by 1.10 GHz. It also carries 4 times the shared L3 cache, 32 MB versus 8 MB, and double the L2 per core, 1 MB versus 512 KB. The memory bandwidth rating is higher as well, 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s, giving the Embedded part a 12.8 GB/s advantage. The process node is denser at 4 nm versus 6 nm, and the transistor count is recorded at 8,315 million for the Ryzen Embedded 9600X, while the Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded transistor count. The PCIe interface is also newer, Gen 5 with 24 lanes versus Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

The Ryzen 3 110 wins on power efficiency. Its TDP is 28 watts, while the Ryzen Embedded 9600X is rated at 65 watts. That 37-watt difference positions the Ryzen 3 110 as the lower-power option, suited to thermally constrained environments. The Ryzen 3 110 also uses the AMD Socket FP7 platform, a mobile socket, while the Ryzen Embedded 9600X uses AMD Socket AM5, a desktop socket. The Ryzen 3 110 has a smaller die size at 210 mm² versus 70.6 mm² for the Ryzen Embedded 9600X, though the Embedded part uses a smaller process node, which explains the die size inversion. The Ryzen 3 110 is not multiplier unlocked, whereas the Ryzen Embedded 9600X is multiplier unlocked, enabling overclocking on the Embedded part.

Architecture Differences

The Ryzen 3 110 is built on the Zen 3+ architecture with the codename Rembrandt-R, while the Ryzen Embedded 9600X uses the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Granite Ridge. The Ryzen 3 110 belongs to the Ryzen 3 generation under the Zen 3+ (Rembrandt) family, and the Ryzen Embedded 9600X belongs to the 9000 series under the Ryzen Embedded (Zen 5, Granite Ridge) family. The process nodes differ, 6 nm for the Ryzen 3 110 and 4 nm for the Ryzen Embedded 9600X, both fabricated by TSMC.

The Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded architecture field beyond Zen 3+, and the Ryzen Embedded 9600X has no recorded architecture field beyond Zen 5. Cache hierarchies differ substantially, as noted above. The Ryzen 3 110 uses 64 KB of L1 per core, while the Ryzen Embedded 9600X uses 80 KB of L1 per core. L2 per core is 512 KB on the Ryzen 3 110 and 1 MB on the Ryzen Embedded 9600X. L3 is 8 MB shared on the Ryzen 3 110 and 32 MB shared on the Ryzen Embedded 9600X.

Both processors support DDR5 memory and dual-channel memory buses, and both support ECC memory. Memory bandwidth is higher on the Ryzen Embedded 9600X at 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s. PCIe support differs, with the Ryzen 3 110 offering Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only) and the Ryzen Embedded 9600X offering Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ as well, with the Ryzen 3 110 using Radeon 660M and the Ryzen Embedded 9600X using Radeon Graphics.

The Ryzen 3 110 has a recorded die size of 210 mm², while the Ryzen Embedded 9600X has a recorded die size of 70.6 mm². The Ryzen Embedded 9600X has a recorded transistor count of 8,315 million, while the Ryzen 3 110 has no transistor count recorded. The socket types are distinct: the Ryzen 3 110 uses AMD Socket FP7 and the Ryzen Embedded 9600X uses AMD Socket AM5. The market segments differ, with the Ryzen 3 110 classified as Mobile and the Ryzen Embedded 9600X classified as Desktop.

The release dates are close, with the Ryzen 3 110 released on 2025-09-30 and the Ryzen Embedded 9600X released on 2025-10-06, six days apart. Both are marked as Active in production status. Neither processor has a launch MSRP recorded in the database. The part numbers are distinct: 100-000000549(FP7r2) for the Ryzen 3 110 and 100-000001405E for the Ryzen Embedded 9600X.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a clear split. The Ryzen Embedded 9600X is the stronger processor in every computational resource category: core count, thread count, base clock, boost clock, L1 cache per core, L2 cache per core, L3 cache, memory bandwidth, PCIe generation, PCIe lane count, transistor count, and process node. It is also multiplier unlocked, which allows user-controlled overclocking. The Ryzen 3 110 is the lower-power option with a 28-watt TDP versus 65 watts, and it uses a mobile socket platform.

For workloads that depend on multi-threading, high clock speeds, or large cache pools, the Ryzen Embedded 9600X is the appropriate choice based on the specification data. Its 6 cores, 12 threads, 5.40 GHz boost clock, and 32 MB of L3 cache give it the resource profile for such tasks. For applications constrained by power or thermal limits, the Ryzen 3 110 with its 28-watt TDP presents a lower-power alternative, though with fewer cores, threads, and less cache.

The lack of benchmark scores means the database cannot confirm the magnitude of the performance gap. The percentile values are identical at 50 for both processors, so the database does not rank one above the other. The verdict must rely on the specification deltas, which consistently favor the Ryzen Embedded 9600X for performance and the Ryzen 3 110 for power efficiency. Neither processor has a recorded launch MSRP, so no pricing analysis is possible.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X boosts to 5.40 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 boosts to 4.30 GHz. The difference is 1.10 GHz.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a TDP of 28 watts, and the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X has a TDP of 65 watts. The Ryzen 3 110 consumes 37 watts less.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X support ECC memory. Both also support DDR5 memory with dual-channel buses.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X has 32 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Embedded part has 4 times the L3 capacity.

Q: Are both processors currently in production?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X are marked as Active in production status.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen 3 110 | AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 4 | 6 |

| Threads | 8 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 3.00 GHz | 3.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.30 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | AMD Socket AM5 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Zen 5 |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Granite Ridge |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 4 nm |

| Transistors | Not recorded | 8,315 million |

| Die Size | 210 mm² | 70.6 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB (shared) | 32 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 24 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 660M | Radeon Graphics |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Multiplier Unlocked | false | true |

| Part Number | 100-000000549(FP7r2) | 100-000001405E |

| Release Date | 2025-09-30 | 2025-10-06 |