AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345. The recorded measurements only include a full benchmark suite for the Ryzen AI 7 345, while the Ryzen 3 110 has no benchmark scores listed. This makes a direct numerical comparison impossible from the recorded data.

The Ryzen AI 7 345 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11461 and a single-core score of 1818. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1712 multi-core and 271 single-core. The PassMark suite shows a single-thread score of 3875, a multithread score of 19927, integer math at 63475, and floating-point math at 42621. Data compression reaches 237484, data encryption hits 11814, extended instructions score 17003, and random string sorting lands at 25435. The physics test scores 1089, and find prime numbers scores 62.

Because the Ryzen 3 110 lacks recorded benchmark scores, the comparison rests on architectural specifications and the Ryzen AI 7 345's position among its nearest rivals. The Ryzen AI 7 345 holds an 81st percentile ranking across all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 29461. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X, scores 29447, a delta of 0%. The AMD EPYC 9654 scores 29409, placing it 0.2% behind. The Intel Core i5-13500HX scores 29270, 0.7% behind. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE scores 29656, 0.7% ahead. These margins show the Ryzen AI 7 345 sits within a tight performance cluster, neither dominating nor trailing its nearest competitors by more than a fraction of a percent.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen AI 7 345 wins on thread count and clock speed. It offers 6 cores and 12 threads, compared to 4 cores and 8 threads for the Ryzen 3 110. Its boost clock reaches 4.60 GHz versus 4.30 GHz for the Ryzen 3 110. The base clock, however, favors the Ryzen 3 110 at 3.00 GHz versus 2.00 GHz for the Ryzen AI 7 345. For workloads that scale with thread count, such as rendering or video encoding, the Ryzen AI 7 345 has a structural advantage. For lightly threaded tasks that depend on sustained base frequency, the Ryzen 3 110 starts from a higher floor.

The Ryzen AI 7 345 also holds the advantage in memory bandwidth. It supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 with 76.8 GB/s. Integrated graphics differ as well: the Ryzen AI 7 345 uses the Radeon 840M, while the Ryzen 3 110 uses the Radeon 660M. The newer Radeon 840M pairs with the newer architecture and faster memory subsystem, which typically benefits GPU-bound tasks.

The Ryzen 3 110 counters with a larger shared L3 cache. It has 8 MB of shared L3, while the Ryzen AI 7 345 has 4 MB. The Ryzen 3 110 also supports ECC memory, a feature absent from the Ryzen AI 7 345. ECC support matters for error-sensitive workloads, though the mobile segment rarely prioritizes it. The Ryzen 3 110 also has more PCIe lanes: 20 lanes versus 14 lanes for the Ryzen AI 7 345, both at Gen 4. For users connecting multiple NVMe drives or external devices, the Ryzen 3 110 offers more headroom.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations and manufacturing nodes. The Ryzen 3 110 uses Zen 3+ architecture under the codename Rembrandt-R, built on a 6 nm TSMC process with a die size of 210 mm². The Ryzen AI 7 345 uses the newer Zen 5 / Zen 5c hybrid architecture under the codename Krackan Point, built on a 4 nm TSMC process. The database does not list a die size for the Ryzen AI 7 345.

Cache layouts differ significantly. The Ryzen 3 110 provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The Ryzen AI 7 345 provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3. The per-core L1 and L2 increases on the Ryzen AI 7 345 reflect the newer Zen 5 design, but the shared L3 pool is halved. This trade-off could affect workloads with large working sets that rely on L3 residency.

Both processors use a dual-channel memory bus, but memory support differs. The Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 only, while the Ryzen AI 7 345 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Ryzen AI 7 345 achieves 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth versus 76.8 GB/s for the Ryzen 3 110. The Ryzen 3 110 supports ECC memory; the Ryzen AI 7 345 does not.

Sockets differ as well. The Ryzen 3 110 uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Ryzen AI 7 345 uses AMD Socket FP8. Both are mobile sockets, and they are not interchangeable. PCIe connectivity also differs: the Ryzen 3 110 provides 20 Gen 4 lanes from the CPU, while the Ryzen AI 7 345 provides 14 Gen 4 lanes.

The Ryzen AI 7 345 was released on January 14, 2025, while the Ryzen 3 110 followed on September 30, 2025. Both are active production parts. Neither has a launch MSRP listed in the database. Both have locked multipliers, so neither supports user overclocking.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What are the clock speed differences?

A: The Ryzen 3 110 has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The Ryzen AI 7 345 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz.

Q: Which processor has more cache?

A: The Ryzen 3 110 has more shared L3 cache at 8 MB, while the Ryzen AI 7 345 has 4 MB of shared L3. The Ryzen AI 7 345 has larger per-core L1 and L2 caches: 80 KB and 1 MB per core, versus 64 KB and 512 KB per core for the Ryzen 3 110.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Ryzen 3 110 supports ECC memory, while the Ryzen AI 7 345 does not.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of each processor?

A: The Ryzen AI 7 345 delivers 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth, while the Ryzen 3 110 delivers 76.8 GB/s.

Q: How does the Ryzen AI 7 345 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen AI 7 345 has an average benchmark score of 29461. The AMD Ryzen 7 3800X scores 29447 (0% delta), the AMD EPYC 9654 scores 29409 (0.2% behind), the Intel Core i5-13500HX scores 29270 (0.7% behind), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE scores 29656 (0.7% ahead).

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split based on workload priorities. The Ryzen AI 7 345 is the stronger multi-threaded performer by specification: 6 cores against 4, 12 threads against 8, a higher boost clock of 4.60 GHz, and higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Its benchmark scores place it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average score of 29461 that lands within 0.7% of several desktop and mobile rivals. The Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmark scores, so its performance position cannot be quantified from the database.

The Ryzen 3 110 offers structural advantages in specific areas: a higher base clock of 3.00 GHz, 8 MB of shared L3 cache, ECC memory support, and 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. These features suit error-sensitive computing and systems with multiple expansion devices. The Ryzen AI 7 345 offers a newer 4 nm process, a newer Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture, a faster boost clock, a larger per-core cache hierarchy, faster memory bandwidth, and a more capable integrated GPU in the Radeon 840M.

For users prioritizing raw multi-threaded throughput, the Ryzen AI 7 345 is the choice. Its benchmark results confirm performance near established desktop parts like the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X. For users needing ECC memory, more PCIe lanes, or a larger L3 cache, the Ryzen 3 110 provides those features, though without recorded benchmark data to validate its performance level. The release dates also matter: the Ryzen 3 110 launched September 30, 2025, while the Ryzen AI 7 345 launched January 14, 2025. The Ryzen AI 7 345 has been in the market longer and carries a full set of benchmark measurements; the Ryzen 3 110 remains unmeasured in the database.