NVIDIA NVS 5200M
NVIDIA graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
NVIDIANVIDIA NVS 5200M Specifications
GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The NVIDIA NVS 5200M GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
NVS 5200M Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the NVS 5200M's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The NVS 5200M by NVIDIA dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
NVIDIA's NVS 5200M Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The NVS 5200M's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
NVS 5200M by NVIDIA Cache
On-chip cache hierarchy
On-chip cache provides ultra-fast data access for the NVS 5200M, reducing the need to fetch data from slower VRAM. L1 and L2 caches store frequently accessed data close to the compute units. AMD's Infinity Cache (L3) dramatically increases effective bandwidth, improving GPU benchmark performance without requiring wider memory buses. Larger cache sizes help maintain high frame rates in memory-bound scenarios and reduce power consumption by minimizing VRAM accesses.
NVS 5200M Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the NVIDIA NVS 5200M against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
Fermi 2.0 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The NVIDIA NVS 5200M is built on NVIDIA's Fermi 2.0 architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the NVS 5200M will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the NVIDIA NVS 5200M determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the NVS 5200M to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
NVS 5200M by NVIDIA Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the NVIDIA NVS 5200M are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
NVIDIA API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the NVIDIA NVS 5200M. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
NVS 5200M Product Information
Release and pricing details
The NVIDIA NVS 5200M is manufactured by NVIDIA as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the NVS 5200M by NVIDIA represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
About NVIDIA NVS 5200M
NVIDIA NVS 5200M is an end-of-life mobile workstation graphics solution built on the Fermi 2.0 architecture, using the GF117 chip fabricated on TSMC's 28 nm process. The card carries 1024 MB of DDR3 memory on a 64-bit bus, yielding 14.40 GB/s of bandwidth, and its benchmark data places it firmly in the entry-level segment with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 2138, sitting at the 12th percentile of all GPUs.
Benchmark Performance
The NVS 5200M's single available benchmark result, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 2138, places it in a tightly contested cluster of low-power mobile and integrated graphics solutions. The data shows a near-statistical dead heat with its closest rival, the Intel HD Graphics 4400, which averages 2142 points — a delta of just -0.2%. This effectively means the NVS 5200M trades blows with that integrated part within noise margins, though the NVIDIA solution offers dedicated memory rather than sharing system RAM.
Against the NVIDIA Quadro 1000M, the NVS 5200M comes out marginally ahead, posting a 0.3% higher score (2138 vs. 2131). This is notable because the Quadro 1000M is a larger, higher-power professional part from an older generation; the newer Fermi 2.0 architecture and 28 nm process node help the NVS 5200M compensate for its narrower 64-bit memory interface and lower transistor count of 585 million.
The gap widens slightly when compared to the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M and Intel UHD Graphics 770, both of which average 2150 points. The NVS 5200M trails each by 0.6%, a small but consistent margin. The 620M comparison is particularly telling: both are Fermi-based mobile parts, but the NVS 5200M's lower clocked memory and workstation-oriented tuning cost it a small performance edge. Against the modern Intel UHD Graphics 770, the NVS 5200M's 28 nm-era compute capabilities hold up surprisingly well in raw OpenCL throughput, though architectural differences in driver optimization and feature support are not captured in this single score.
In terms of raw compute metrics, the card delivers 240.0 GFLOPS of FP32 performance, a pixel rate of 2.500 GPixel/s, and a texture rate of 10.00 GTexel/s. These figures align with its 96 shading units, 16 texture mapping units, and just 4 ROPs. The 4 ROPs are a significant bottleneck for fill-rate-bound workloads, but the 10.00 GTexel/s texture rate is adequate for light 3D rendering tasks typical of mobile workstations circa 2012.
How It Compares
vs. Intel HD Graphics 4400: The NVS 5200M edges out this integrated solution by a razor-thin 0.2% margin in average benchmark score. While the performance is essentially identical, the NVS 5200M's dedicated 1024 MB of DDR3 memory and 14.40 GB/s bandwidth provide more consistent frame pacing in memory-constrained scenarios. The HD Graphics 4400 relies on shared system memory, which can introduce latency spikes that this score does not fully reflect.
vs. NVIDIA Quadro 1000M: The NVS 5200M leads by 0.3%, a modest but real advantage. This is a generational win: the Quadro 1000M uses an older architecture and larger die, while the NVS 5200M benefits from the 28 nm process and Fermi 2.0 refinements. The newer part achieves higher efficiency per transistor, allowing it to outperform a professional card that likely drew more power and generated more heat.
vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M: The GT 620M holds a 0.6% advantage, the largest deficit the NVS 5200M faces in this quartet. Both share the GF117 chip, but the GT 620M is tuned for consumer gaming with higher memory clocks (1800 Mbps effective on both, though the 620M may sustain boost states differently). The NVS 5200M's workstation drivers prioritize stability over raw throughput, which explains the small but consistent delta.
vs. Intel UHD Graphics 770: The modern integrated GPU from Intel outperforms the NVS 5200M by 0.6%, which is remarkable given the decade-plus gap in release dates. The UHD Graphics 770 benefits from vastly improved memory bandwidth and execution resource management, yet the Fermi-based card still holds its ground in this synthetic OpenCL workload. This suggests the NVS 5200M's compute efficiency was ahead of its time, even if its feature set is now dated.
Power and Cooling
The NVS 5200M carries a thermal design power of 25 W, which classifies it as a low-power mobile solution suitable for thin-and-light workstation laptops. This TDP is modest enough that passive cooling is feasible in many chassis, though active cooling is recommended for sustained loads given the Fermi architecture's known thermal characteristics under full compute utilization.
The card uses an MXM module form factor with a slot width of "MXM Module," meaning it is not a standard PCIe card but rather a replaceable mobile graphics module. Power delivery is handled entirely through the MXM connector; the card requires no auxiliary power connectors, as indicated by "None" in the power connectors field. No suggested PSU wattage is provided in the data, but given the 25 W TDP and connector-less design, any system that supports MXM modules will have adequate power headroom from its existing supply.
Cooling requirements are minimal due to the low TDP, but the 28 nm process node helps disperse heat efficiently across the 116 mm² die. The transistor density of 5.0M per mm² means the 585 million transistors are packed tightly, yet the low clock speeds (memory at 900 MHz, 1800 Mbps effective) keep thermal output manageable. For a laptop manufacturer, a simple heatpipe and small fan arrangement would suffice; for end-users, the primary concern is ensuring adequate chassis airflow rather than upgrading coolers.
FAQ
Q: What is the NVS 5200M's memory configuration?
A: It has 1024 MB of DDR3 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 14.40 GB/s of bandwidth and running at 900 MHz (1800 Mbps effective).
Q: How does the NVS 5200M perform against the Intel HD Graphics 4400?
A: The NVS 5200M scores 2138 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 0.2% lower than the HD Graphics 4400's 2142 average. Performance is effectively identical in this workload.
Q: What is the TDP of this GPU?
A: The thermal design power is 25 W, making it a low-power mobile part that does not require external power connectors.
Q: Does the NVS 5200M support modern APIs?
A: It supports DirectX 12 (11_0) and OpenGL 4.6, but Vulkan support is not listed in the data.
Q: What form factor does the NVS 5200M use?
A: It is an MXM module, and display outputs are portable device dependent, meaning connections vary by laptop implementation.
Q: How does it stack up against the Intel UHD Graphics 770?
A: The NVS 5200M trails the UHD 770 by 0.6% (2138 vs. 2150), a surprisingly small gap given the UHD 770's much newer architecture.
Who Should Consider It
The NVS 5200M is not a gaming card, and the data confirms this: a 12th percentile ranking among all GPUs means it will struggle with any modern 3D title at playable settings. However, for legacy workstation applications or light productivity tasks, the dedicated 1024 MB of DDR3 memory and 14.40 GB/s bandwidth make it a viable option for mobile systems from the early 2010s. Users running software that leverages OpenCL acceleration — such as older CAD tools or basic image processing — will find performance comparable to the Intel HD Graphics 4400, which means it can handle 720p video playback and 2D interface work without issue.
At 1080p resolution, the 2.500 GPixel/s pixel rate and 4 ROPs will limit the card to simple 2D workloads or very old (pre-2010) 3D applications at low detail settings. The 240.0 GFLOPS FP32 throughput is sufficient for basic compute tasks but will not accelerate modern machine learning or complex simulations. For users with a legacy MXM-equipped laptop who need a functional, low-power GPU for office work, spreadsheet rendering, or multi-monitor output (via whatever ports the laptop provides), the NVS 5200M remains serviceable.
The 0.3% advantage over the Quadro 1000M suggests that within the same era, this card is a slightly better choice for professional ISV applications than its predecessor. But given its end-of-life status and the fact that even the integrated Intel UHD Graphics 770 outperforms it by 0.6%, there is no reason to seek this card out for new builds. It is only relevant for repairing or upgrading vintage mobile workstations where MXM compatibility and the 25 W TDP are the primary constraints.
Detailed benchmark scores and charts for the NVIDIA NVS 5200M are below.
Benchmark Scores
geekbench_openclSource
Geekbench OpenCL tests GPU compute performance using the cross-platform OpenCL API. This shows how NVIDIA NVS 5200M handles parallel computing tasks like video encoding and scientific simulations. OpenCL is widely supported across different GPU vendors and platforms. Higher scores benefit applications that leverage GPU acceleration for non-graphics workloads.
Top 5 Performers
Top 5 PerformersNearby Performers
Nearby PerformersCompare with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs