Valorant
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 320 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 281 | 284 | 292 | 342 |
| 1440p QHD | 305 | 307 | 311 | 365 |
| 1080p Full HD | 319 | 322 | 328 | 386 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Valorant with Intel Core i5-10400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i5-10400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 delivers exceptional frame rates in Valorant, a competitive FPS where high refresh rates are paramount. The measured data shows that this combination consistently produces average FPS well above the thresholds required for even the fastest gaming monitors, indicating a system that minimizes graphical bottlenecks and leverages the esports-tuned nature of the title. The following analysis breaks down the performance characteristics across resolutions and settings.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a system that is heavily CPU-bound at lower resolutions, with the GPU only beginning to assert its influence at the highest pixel counts. At the High preset, moving from 1920x1080 (321.9 avg FPS) to 2560x1440 (306.5 avg FPS) results in a modest drop of approximately 4.8%. The scaling from 1440p to 4K (284 avg FPS) shows a further decline of about 7.3%. This relatively gentle slope indicates that the processor is the primary limiting factor, as the graphics card has ample headroom to render frames quickly.
The trend becomes clearer when examining the Low preset, which is designed to minimize GPU load. Here, the 1080p result is 386.2 avg FPS, which falls to 365.1 at 1440p and 342.1 at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is roughly 11.4%, which is a tighter margin than the 13.4% drop seen on the High preset across the same resolution span. This suggests that even when the graphics workload is lightened, the CPU's frame generation limit is being reached, capping performance. The data shows that the RTX 5070 is not the bottleneck; a less powerful GPU would likely show a steeper decline in FPS as resolution increases, whereas this setup demonstrates that the i5-10400F is the component determining the upper ceiling of performance.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the benchmark database, this specific combination of the Intel Core i5-10400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 holds a rank of 1287 out of 1650 tested combos in Valorant. This places it in the 78th percentile of all system pairings, indicating that it outperforms the majority of tested configurations. The ranking suggests that while the individual components are strong, the pairing is not maximizing its potential, likely due to the aforementioned CPU limitation in a game that favors high single-thread performance.
The CPU's own benchmark data supports this interpretation. In the database, the Core i5-10400F sits in the 73rd percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 14168. Its nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 7552 (0.4% faster), the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C (0.8% slower), and the Intel Core i5-8500 (1.1% slower). This shows the processor is a mid-to-upper tier part for general compute, but its architecture is not tailored for the absolute highest frame rates in esports titles. The GPU, conversely, is a top-tier part, ranking in the 83rd percentile with an average score of 41687, placing it near the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (0.6% faster) and AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (0.2% slower). The rank of this combo reflects a scenario where the GPU's potential is partially held back by the older CPU generation.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data provides clear guidance for optimal settings based on the user's display refresh rate. For 1080p and 1440p panels, even the most demanding Ultra preset delivers average frame rates that exceed 300 FPS (319.3 and 305, respectively). This means users with 240Hz or 360Hz monitors can comfortably enable maximum visual quality without sacrificing competitive performance. The High and Medium presets offer marginal FPS increases over Ultra, but the visual fidelity difference is likely to be more significant than the slight performance gain.
For 4K resolution, the situation changes slightly. The Ultra preset yields 281 avg FPS, while High provides 284 avg FPS, a negligible difference. The Low preset at 4K provides 342.1 avg FPS, which is a substantial jump of over 21% compared to Ultra. This data indicates that at 4K, the system begins to show a slight sensitivity to settings, but all presets remain playable at high refresh rates. The recommendation is to use the Ultra preset at all resolutions for the best visual experience, as the measured frame rate penalty is minimal, and the system's performance is robust enough to handle it without dipping below the 280 FPS mark.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The complete dataset reveals a consistent pattern of performance across all tested configurations. At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from a low of 319.3 on Ultra to a high of 386.2 on Low. The Medium and High presets sit in between at 327.8 and 321.9, respectively. This shows a 17.3% performance spread between the lowest and highest settings, which is a small margin, confirming that the CPU is the limiting factor, as the GPU can easily handle the varying workload.
At 2560x1440, the results are closely packed. The Low preset achieves 365.1 avg FPS, followed by Medium at 311, High at 306.5, and Ultra at 305. The difference between High and Ultra is negligible (0.5%), and the gap between Low and Ultra is 16.5%. Moving to 3840x2160, the trend continues. Low yields 342.1 avg FPS, Medium drops to 291.6, High to 284, and Ultra to 281. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K is 17.9%, showing that the resolution increase does not exacerbate the setting sensitivity, which would be expected if the GPU were the primary bottleneck. All 12 measured configurations produce average FPS above 280, underscoring the system's capability to drive high-refresh-rate displays in this specific game.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a 5 nm process, is a powerful graphics card that is underutilized in Valorant. Its specifications include 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, alongside 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2325 MHz and a boost clock of 2512 MHz, with 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. The card's raw compute capability is substantial, with an FP32 performance of 30.87 TFLOPS and a pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s.
Despite these high specifications, the measured FPS data shows that the GPU is not the performance limiter in this pairing. The benchmark results for the RTX 5070 show a Passmark G3D score of 29137, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and the AMD Radeon Pro 580X. The fact that the FPS does not scale dramatically with lower settings or resolutions indicates that the GPU's frame rendering time is shorter than the CPU's frame generation time. The card's high bandwidth and fast clock speeds are more than sufficient to handle Valorant's relatively simple graphics workload, ensuring that its role is to provide a stable, high-FPS output without becoming a constraint.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-10400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Comet Lake architecture, built on a 14 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, with a 12 MB shared L3 cache. The processor supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering a memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s. Its benchmark scores, such as a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10297 and a single-core score of 1453, position it as a capable mid-range CPU. However, its performance in Valorant is dictated by its single-thread speed and IPC (instructions per clock), which are lower than newer architectures.
The data strongly suggests that the i5-10400F is the definitive bottleneck in this system for Valorant. The 3DMark single-thread score of 688 and the Passmark single-thread score of 2541 are the metrics that correlate most strongly with esports performance. The fact that the FPS at 1080p Low (386.2) is only slightly higher than at 4K Low (342.1) indicates that the CPU is hitting a performance ceiling around the 380-390 FPS mark, regardless of the GPU load. The CPU's percentile rank of 73% against all CPUs, while respectable, shows it is not a top-tier part for this specific workload. The 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for Valorant's engine, but the older Comet Lake architecture's lower IPC prevents it from feeding the RTX 5070 with frames as fast as a more modern processor could, capping the system's overall potential in this title.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-10400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-10400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 in Valorant
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 342.1 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 291.6 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 284.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 281.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 365.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 311.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 306.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 305.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 386.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 327.8 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 321.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 319.3 |
Valorant with ii5-10400F + Other GPUs
See how Valorant performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Valorant with RTX 5070 + Other CPUs
See how Valorant performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-10400F + RTX 5070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.