Valorant

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the Intel Arc B570 produces a combination that ranks 2,227th out of 2,883 tested combos in Valorant. This places the pairing in the lower-middle portion of the database, suggesting that while it is far from the top-tier configurations, it is also not among the weakest. The rank reflects a system that is capable of delivering playable frame rates, but it is not one that will dominate leaderboards for raw performance. The data shows this combo sits in the 23rd percentile of all measured pairings, which is a meaningful indicator that other CPU-GPU combinations offer more headroom for this specific title.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 2,227 out of 2,883 is a critical data point for understanding where this system stands. It means that roughly 77% of all tested configurations outperform this pairing in Valorant, while 23% are slower. This is not a flattering position, but it is a realistic one for a mid-range CPU paired with a newer budget-oriented GPU. The ranking suggests that the combination is not bottlenecked in a way that produces catastrophic frame rates; rather, it is a balanced but modest setup. For context, the CPU alone holds a 77th percentile ranking among all processors, which is solid, but the GPU’s 65th percentile ranking among all graphics cards pulls the overall combo down. The interaction between these two components in Valorant, a game known for being CPU-sensitive, is what ultimately drives this result.

Benchmark results indicate that the Ryzen 5 7500F’s single-threaded strength is a key asset here. Its 3DMark single-thread score of 974 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,218 are competitive, but the Arc B570 does not boost the system to higher echelons. The combo’s rank is far below what a top-tier GPU would achieve with the same CPU, which points to the GPU as the limiting factor in most scenarios. However, the data also shows that the CPU is not holding the GPU back entirely, as frame rates remain high across all settings. This is a pairing that will satisfy casual players but will not impress those chasing maximum refresh rates on high-end monitors.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture with a BMG-G21 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It features 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s base and boost clocks are both set at 2500 MHz, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). These specifications position the card as a capable 1080p and 1440p performer, which is consistent with the measured frame rates in Valorant. The 10 GB frame buffer is more than sufficient for a game like Valorant, which is not VRAM-intensive, so memory capacity is unlikely to be a constraint at any resolution tested.

The GPU’s compute capabilities include 2,304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output pipelines, with a pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput of 11.52 TFLOPS gives the card enough raw power to handle the game’s moderate graphics demands. In benchmark tests, the Arc B570 posts a Passmark G3D score of 14,195 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 96,844, which are respectable numbers for its class. The nearest rival data shows it is nearly identical in average score to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (deltaPct 0.1%) and Intel Arc A750 (deltaPct -0.1%), indicating that performance is on par with those established cards.

In Valorant, the GPU’s role becomes more pronounced at higher resolutions and settings, where the frame rate drops from the CPU-bound 1080p Low results. The data shows that the GPU can push 217 FPS at 4K High and 207 FPS at 4K Ultra, which are strong numbers for a card in this tier. The card’s 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs means it outperforms a majority of the field, but it is not a high-end part. Its performance in this game is sufficient to maintain high refresh rates at 1080p and playable rates at 4K, which is a notable achievement for a card with a 150 W TDP.

FAQ

Q: What is the combo’s overall rank in Valorant?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and Intel Arc B570 combination ranks 2,227th out of 2,883 tested combos in Valorant.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F has an average benchmark score of 24,964. It is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-11850H (24,935), 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13620H (24,911), and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core 5 210H (24,872), while being 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (25,005).

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The highest average FPS is 508, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: Does the GPU have enough VRAM for Valorant at 4K?

A: Yes, the 10 GB GDDR6 memory is more than sufficient, as the measured FPS at 3840x2160 ranges from 207 to 347 depending on settings.

Q: How does the GPU’s performance compare to the Intel Arc A750?

A: The Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20,556, which is 0.1% lower than the Arc A750’s score of 20,582.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded in the measured data?

A: The lowest minimum FPS recorded is 194, which occurs at 3840x2160 resolution with Medium settings.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how the combo performs across different preset levels. At 1080p, the Low preset delivers 508 FPS, which is the highest average recorded for any configuration. This is ideal for competitive play where maximum frame rates are paramount, especially on high-refresh-rate monitors. The Medium preset drops to 335 FPS, which is still excellent, but the 173 FPS difference between Low and Medium suggests that the Low preset is the best choice for esports-focused players who prioritize responsiveness over visual fidelity. The High preset at 319 FPS and Ultra at 304 FPS are marginally slower, indicating diminishing returns for higher settings at this resolution.

At 1440p, the story remains similar. Low settings produce 434 FPS, which is a significant drop from 1080p but still well above the threshold for smooth gameplay. Medium settings yield 286 FPS, while High and Ultra deliver 272 and 259 FPS, respectively. For players with 1440p monitors, the Low preset is again the recommended choice for competitive play, as it offers the highest headroom. However, the difference between Low and Medium is 148 FPS, which is substantial, so those who value visual quality might consider Medium as a compromise, but the data shows Low is superior for performance.

At 4K, the frame rates become more modest but remain playable. Low settings produce 347 FPS, which is still very high, while Medium, High, and Ultra deliver 228, 217, and 207 FPS, respectively. The drop from Low to Medium is 119 FPS, which is noticeable, but even Ultra maintains above 200 FPS. For 4K gaming, the Low preset offers the best experience in terms of frame rate, but the visual differences are more pronounced at this resolution. Given that Valorant is not graphically demanding, the Low preset is the recommended choice across all resolutions to maximize the combo’s performance, as it consistently provides the highest average FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combo is comprehensive, covering three resolutions and four settings levels. At 1920x1080, the Low preset leads with 508 FPS, followed by Medium at 335 FPS, High at 319 FPS, and Ultra at 304 FPS. The Medium preset also has a recorded minimum of 285 FPS and a maximum of 385 FPS, which provides a range for frame time variability. The spread between Low and Ultra is 204 FPS, which is substantial and shows how much performance is lost by increasing graphical fidelity at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the Low preset produces 434 FPS, which is a 74 FPS drop from 1080p Low. Medium settings deliver 286 FPS, with a minimum of 243 FPS and a maximum of 329 FPS. High settings yield 272 FPS, and Ultra comes in at 259 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 175 FPS, which is slightly narrower than at 1080p, indicating that the GPU is beginning to play a larger role. The minimum FPS of 243 at Medium is still well above the 144 Hz refresh rate that many monitors use, so gameplay remains smooth.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset delivers 347 FPS, which is a 161 FPS drop from 1080p Low. Medium settings produce 228 FPS, with a minimum of 194 FPS and a maximum of 263 FPS. High settings yield 217 FPS, and Ultra delivers 207 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra shrinks to 140 FPS, which suggests that the CPU is becoming the limiting factor at this resolution. Even at 4K Ultra, the average FPS of 207 is above the 200 FPS threshold, making it a viable option for players with high-refresh-rate 4K displays, though the Low preset remains the best for pure performance.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, and built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The CPU features 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration is well-suited for gaming, as the high boost clock and efficient architecture provide strong single-threaded performance, which Valorant relies heavily upon. In benchmark tests, the CPU scores 3,218 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 22,799 in multi-core, indicating robust performance across both lightly and heavily threaded workloads.

The CPU’s 3DMark scores further illustrate its capabilities: 974 in single-thread, 1,902 in 2-thread, 3,621 in 4-thread, 5,372 in 8-thread, and 6,379 in max-thread tests. These numbers show a linear scaling up to 8 threads, with diminishing returns beyond that, which is typical for a 6-core part. The Passmark single-thread score of 3,841 is particularly relevant for Valorant, as the game’s engine is known to be sensitive to single-core performance. The CPU’s 77th percentile ranking among all processors confirms that it is a solid mid-range choice, but it is not a top-tier part like a 16-core or 24-core flagship.

In this combo, the CPU is likely the primary driver of performance at lower resolutions and settings. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the frame rate reaches 508 FPS, which is a level that the GPU alone could not achieve without a strong CPU. The CPU’s ability to feed the GPU with data at high rates is evident in the minimal frame rate drops when moving from Medium to High settings at 1080p. However, at higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, as evidenced by the smaller gaps between settings. The CPU’s role is thus crucial for achieving the highest possible frame rates, but it is not the limiting factor at 4K.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K provides insight into the balance between CPU and GPU in this combo. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 508 at 1080p to 434 at 1440p (a 14.6% decrease) and then to 347 at 4K (a 31.7% decrease from 1440p). This scaling pattern is relatively flat, suggesting that the CPU is the dominant factor at Low settings across all resolutions. The GPU has enough headroom to handle the increased pixel count without causing a dramatic performance collapse, which is a sign that the CPU is keeping up with the GPU’s demands.

At Medium settings, the FPS drops from 335 at 1080p to 286 at 1440p (a 14.6% decrease) and then to 228 at 4K (a 20.3% decrease from 1440p). The scaling is similar to Low, but the absolute numbers are lower, indicating that the GPU is starting to play a larger role. At High settings, the FPS drops from 319 at 1080p to 272 at 1440p (a 14.7% decrease) and then to 217 at 4K (a 20.2% decrease from 1440p). This pattern continues, with the GPU becoming more influential as settings increase.

At Ultra settings, the FPS drops from 304 at 1080p to 259 at 1440p (a 14.8% decrease) and then to 207 at 4K (a 20.1% decrease from 1440p). The consistency of the percentage drops across settings is notable, with roughly a 15% decrease from 1080p to 1440p and a 20% decrease from 1440p to 4K. This suggests that neither component is severely bottlenecked at any resolution, but the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K, as the absolute frame rates are lower and the gaps between settings are narrower. The data indicates that this combo is well-balanced for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but at 4K, the GPU’s performance ceiling is reached, preventing the CPU from fully flexing its strengths.