Valorant

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and Intel Arc B570 pairing delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Valorant across all tested settings, with the data indicating a system that is overwhelmingly capable of driving high-refresh-rate displays. The measured results show that even at the most demanding 4K Ultra preset, the average frame rate remains well above the threshold for competitive play, suggesting that the primary bottleneck in most scenarios is the CPU rather than the GPU.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K is significant but not as dramatic as typically seen in more graphically intensive titles. At Low settings, the average FPS decreases from 508 at 1920x1080 to 347 at 3840x2160, a reduction of approximately 31.7%. This indicates that while the resolution increase does load the Intel Arc B570 more heavily, the GPU still has ample headroom to maintain very high performance. The transition from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 at Low settings shows a drop from 434 FPS to 347 FPS, a 20% decrease, which is a more moderate scaling curve than the jump from 1080p to 1440p.

The pattern shifts slightly when examining higher quality presets. At High settings, the average FPS moves from 319 at 1080p to 272 at 1440p, and finally to 217 at 4K. This represents a 14.7% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 20.2% drop from 1440p to 4K. The Ultra preset follows a similar trajectory, with 304 FPS at 1080p, 259 FPS at 1440p, and 207 FPS at 4K. The consistency of these scaling patterns suggests that the game's rendering engine is well-optimized for this hardware combination, with no sudden cliff in performance that would indicate a severe architectural bottleneck.

At Medium settings, the only preset with full min/max FPS data, the scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a drop from 335 to 286 average FPS (14.6%), while the 4K result of 228 average FPS represents a further 20.3% reduction. The minimum FPS values also scale predictably: 285 at 1080p, 243 at 1440p, and 194 at 4K. This indicates that frame time consistency is maintained as resolution increases, with the gap between average and minimum FPS remaining relatively stable across resolutions.

The data strongly suggests that the limiting component shifts from CPU-bound at lower resolutions to more balanced at 4K. At 1080p Low, the 508 FPS average is likely near the CPU's practical ceiling for this game, as the Ryzen 5 8400F's six cores and 12 threads are heavily utilized. As resolution increases, the GPU begins to take on more of the workload, but the Arc B570's 10 GB of GDDR6 memory and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth prove sufficient to prevent any major frame rate collapse.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is a six-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. In Valorant, which is known to be sensitive to single-thread performance, the CPU's 3dmark_single_thread score of 951 and passmark_single_thread score of 3685 indicate strong per-core capability. The 16 MB of shared L3 cache also helps reduce memory latency, which is crucial for maintaining high frame rates in fast-paced FPS titles.

The CPU's benchmark scores provide context for its gaming performance. The cinebench_r23_multicore score of 20851 and singlecore score of 2943 suggest a balanced processor that can handle both the game's main thread and background processes. The passmark_multithread score of 24389, combined with the 3dmark_16_threads score of 6091, shows that the CPU does not become a significant bottleneck even when the GPU is pushed to its limits at 4K resolution.

Comparing to the nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 8400F's average benchmark score of 25005 is only 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F's 24964, and 0.3% higher than the Intel Core i7-11850H's 24935. This places it in a very tight performance band, with a 0.4% lead over the Intel Core i7-13620H and a 0.4% deficit against the AMD EPYC 9474F. The percentileVsAllCpus of 77 indicates that this processor outperforms 77% of all CPUs in the database, which is a strong showing for a mainstream desktop part.

The CPU's 65 W TDP and 4 nm process node from TSMC indicate efficient power delivery, which allows for sustained boost clocks during extended gaming sessions. The lack of integrated graphics means the system relies entirely on the discrete Arc B570, but this is not a concern for gaming performance. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth from dual-channel DDR5 support is adequate for Valorant's requirements, though the game does not heavily stress memory throughput.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B570, based on the Xe2-HPG architecture and Battlemage generation, brings 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus with 380.0 GB/s bandwidth. This memory configuration is more than sufficient for Valorant, which is not a VRAM-intensive title. The GPU's 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 80 ROPs provide the raw compute power needed to maintain high frame rates, while the 18 ray tracing cores are largely unused in this competitive shooter.

The GPU's clock speeds are notable: both base and boost clocks are listed at 2500 MHz, with memory running at 2375 MHz or 19 Gbps effective. This high boost clock, combined with the 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, allows the card to push the very high frame rates observed in the measured data. The 200.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 360.0 GTexel/s texture rate ensure that even at 4K resolution, the GPU can fill the screen without becoming a limiting factor.

Benchmark results show the Arc B570's passmark_g3d score of 14195 places it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, has an average score of 20534, just 0.1% lower, while the Intel Arc A750 is 0.1% higher at 20582. The AMD Radeon R9 M390X trails by 0.5% at 20662, and the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M is 0.4% ahead at 20480. These scores indicate that the Arc B570 is positioned in the mid-range segment, but for Valorant specifically, the performance is far above what the raw benchmark numbers might suggest.

The 10 GB VRAM capacity is particularly relevant for 4K gaming, though Valorant's texture requirements are modest. The 150 W TDP and 1x 8-pin power connector make this a manageable card for most systems, with a suggested 450 W PSU. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU, and the 272 mm length fits in most mid-tower cases.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 5 8400F and Arc B570 ranks 2227 out of 2883 tested combos in Valorant, placing it in the 22.8th percentile of all combinations. This ranking is surprisingly low given the absolute performance numbers, which suggests that the database includes many combinations with higher-end CPUs or GPUs that achieve even more extreme frame rates in this highly optimized game.

The rank indicates that while this combo delivers excellent playable performance, there are 656 other combinations that produce higher average FPS in Valorant. This is likely due to the game's unusual scalability with high single-thread performance and the fact that many of the top-ranked combos feature flagship CPUs like the fastest Ryzen 7000/9000 series or Intel Core i9 parts, paired with top-tier GPUs.

Despite the rank, the actual measured FPS values are all well above 200 FPS even at 4K Ultra, which is far beyond the refresh rate capabilities of most monitors. The combo's position in the bottom quartile of the ranking is more a reflection of the competition than a criticism of this hardware's capabilities. The data shows that this combination is more than adequate for competitive play at any resolution, and the ranking should be interpreted as "good but not elite" rather than "underperforming."

The percentileVsAllGpus of 65 for the Arc B570 and percentileVsAllCpus of 77 for the Ryzen 5 8400F indicate that both components are above average individually, but their combined ranking in this specific game is lower because Valorant rewards raw single-thread CPU performance and high-end GPUs to an extreme degree.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo maintain 240 FPS at 1080p?

A: Yes, at High settings the average FPS is 319 at 1920x1080, which is well above 240. Even at Ultra settings, the average of 304 FPS exceeds this threshold, and at Low settings the 508 FPS average is more than double the requirement.

Q: Is the 10 GB VRAM sufficient for 4K gaming in Valorant?

A: The measured data shows 4K High settings produce a 217 FPS average, and 4K Ultra produces 207 FPS. The 10 GB GDDR6 memory with 380.0 GB/s bandwidth is not a limiting factor, as even the most demanding preset does not cause a significant performance drop.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Ryzen 5 7500F?

A: The Ryzen 5 8400F has an average benchmark score of 25005, which is 0.2% higher than the Ryzen 5 7500F's 24964. Both CPUs are nearly identical in synthetic benchmarks, suggesting similar gaming performance.

Q: What is the expected FPS at 1440p Medium settings?

A: The measured data shows an average of 286 FPS at 2560x1440 with Medium settings, with a minimum of 243 FPS and a maximum of 329 FPS. This provides a smooth experience on 144Hz or 165Hz monitors.

Q: Is the Arc B570 better than the Arc A750?

A: In terms of average benchmark score, the Arc B570 at 20556 is 0.1% lower than the Arc A750 at 20582. The two GPUs are essentially equivalent in synthetic tests, though the B570 has newer architecture.

Q: Does the combo perform better at 1080p Low or 4K Ultra?

A: The 1080p Low setting produces a 508 FPS average, which is 301 FPS higher than the 207 FPS average at 4K Ultra. The lower resolution and settings reduce the GPU load significantly, allowing the CPU to push higher frame rates.

Settings Recommendations

For competitive play where maximum frame rates are prioritized, the Low preset at 1920x1080 delivers the highest average FPS at 508, which maximizes the refresh rate potential of high-end monitors. This setting is recommended for players who use 360Hz or 500Hz displays and want to ensure the frame rate never dips below the monitor's refresh rate. The data shows no minimum FPS recorded for this setting, but the average is so high that even significant dips would remain above 400 FPS.

For players with 240Hz monitors who want a balance between visual quality and performance, the High preset at 1080p offers a 319 FPS average, which provides a comfortable margin above 240. Alternatively, the Medium preset at 1080p with a 335 FPS average and a recorded minimum of 285 FPS ensures that even the most intense firefights stay above the refresh rate threshold. The Ultra preset at 1080p, with a 304 FPS average, is also viable for 240Hz displays while providing the best visual fidelity.

At 1440p, the Medium preset yields a 286 FPS average with a 243 FPS minimum, making it suitable for 240Hz monitors, while the High preset at 272 FPS average is better for 144Hz or 165Hz displays. For 4K gaming, the High preset's 217 FPS average is the recommended choice for 144Hz monitors, as it provides good visual quality while maintaining high frame rates. The Ultra preset at 4K, with a 207 FPS average, is acceptable for 144Hz displays but offers minimal visual improvement over High for the performance cost.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the performance scales predictably across settings. The Low preset delivers the highest average FPS at 508, followed by Medium at 335, High at 319, and Ultra at 304. The Medium preset is the only one with full min/max data, showing a minimum of 285 FPS and a maximum of 385 FPS, indicating a tight frame time distribution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the average FPS drops across all settings. Low produces 434 FPS, Medium 286 FPS, High 272 FPS, and Ultra 259 FPS. The Medium preset again has the only min/max data, with 243 FPS minimum and 329 FPS maximum. This represents a 14.6% drop from Medium 1080p to Medium 1440p.

At 3840x2160, the performance further decreases. Low yields 347 FPS, Medium 228 FPS, High 217 FPS, and Ultra 207 FPS. The Medium preset shows a minimum of 194 FPS and a maximum of 263 FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is more consistent across settings, with drops ranging from 20.0% for Low to 20.3% for Medium, indicating that the GPU is becoming the primary limiter at this resolution.

The overall pattern shows that this combo is capable of exceeding 200 FPS at every resolution and setting combination tested, with the only exception being the 4K Ultra preset at 207 FPS, which still exceeds 200. The data confirms that the Ryzen 5 8400F and Arc B570 provide an excellent foundation for high-refresh-rate Valorant gaming, with no configuration falling below the playable threshold.