Undisputed

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 combination ranks 555th out of 2,813 tested combos for Undisputed, placing it in the top 20% of all systems evaluated. This position indicates a strong pairing for this sports title, though the data shows that performance is heavily influenced by graphics settings and resolution. The system consistently delivers playable frame rates even at demanding 4K Ultra settings, while at lower resolutions and settings it reaches refresh rates high enough to satisfy competitive play.

How This Combo Ranks

The comboRankInGame of 555 out of 2,813 places this system in the 80th percentile of all tested combinations. This is a strong showing, but the ranking tells only part of the story. The data reveals substantial performance headroom, particularly at lower resolutions where the system's output is less constrained by the visual workload.

At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 400 FPS, a figure that places it far above the needs of any standard display. The ranking reflects the average performance across all tested scenarios, but the spread between the best and worst cases is significant. The system's weakest performance comes at 4K Ultra, where it still maintains 70 FPS, which is comfortably within the playable range for a sports title.

The ranking is also influenced by the CPU and GPU's individual standings. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 holds a 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the RTX 5070 sits at the 82nd percentile among all GPUs. This suggests the CPU is a relative strength, but in Undisputed, the GPU workload dominates at higher resolutions, as evidenced by the FPS scaling patterns.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 brings 20 cores and 20 threads to the system, a configuration that provides ample parallel processing capability for a sports simulation. Its base clock of 2.40 GHz can boost up to 5.30 GHz, allowing it to handle both high-frequency single-threaded tasks and multi-threaded workloads that benefit from the 20-core count.

The CPU's 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 3 MB per core L2 cache help maintain data throughput, while its 17,800 million transistors on a 3 nm process node deliver strong efficiency. In synthetic benchmarks, the chip scores 42,216 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 5,960 in single-core, showing balanced performance across both metrics.

For Undisputed, the CPU's role appears secondary at higher resolutions. The measured FPS data shows that at 4K, performance drops significantly across all settings compared to 1440p, indicating the GPU becomes the limiting factor. However, at 1080p Low, the CPU's ability to feed the GPU becomes more apparent, with the system reaching 400 FPS. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking among all processors suggests it has sufficient headroom to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in most scenarios.

The CPU's nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 4464P, which scores 64,823 on average, a delta of -0.3% compared to the Intel chip's 64,640 average. This places the Core Ultra 7 265 in close competition with server-class processors, indicating its strong multi-threaded capabilities. The 20 threads are more than sufficient for the AI calculations and physics simulation in a boxing game, where the workload is typically spread across multiple cores.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with 6,144 shading units and 48 RT cores. Its 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus provides 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is critical for high-resolution textures and effects in Undisputed. The GPU's 30.87 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 201.0 GPixel/s pixel rate indicate substantial raw processing power.

The GPU's boost clock of 2512 MHz and base clock of 2325 MHz are relatively modest by current standards, but the architecture's efficiency compensates. In synthetic benchmarks, the RTX 5070 scores 29,137 in Passmark G3D and 172,660 in Geekbench OpenCL, placing it at the 82nd percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 580, which scores 40,318 on average, a delta of just 0.1% compared to the RTX 5070's 40,377 average.

The GPU's role in Undisputed is clearly dominant at higher resolutions. The measured FPS data shows that at 4K, the system's performance scales dramatically with settings, dropping from 183 FPS at Low to 70 FPS at Ultra. This pattern indicates that the GPU is the primary constraint at 4K, with the CPU providing sufficient support. At 1080p, the GPU's workload is lighter, and the system can achieve 400 FPS at Low settings, suggesting the CPU is capable of driving the GPU to its limits.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data covers three resolutions and four settings levels, providing a comprehensive view of the system's performance in Undisputed.

At 1920x1080, the system achieves its highest frame rates. With Low settings, the average FPS is 400, representing the absolute ceiling of the pairing. Medium settings produce 288 FPS with a minimum of 245 and maximum of 331 FPS, showing smooth performance with minor variance. High settings drop to 238 FPS, still well above the refresh rate of most monitors. Ultra settings reduce the average to 153 FPS, which remains highly playable and leaves room for high-refresh-rate displays.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong but scales down as expected. Low settings produce 289 FPS, while Medium delivers 208 FPS with a range of 177 to 239 FPS. High settings achieve 172 FPS, and Ultra drops to 111 FPS. These numbers indicate that 1440p is well within the system's capabilities, with even Ultra settings maintaining a comfortable frame rate.

At 3840x2160, the system begins to show its limits. Low settings still deliver 183 FPS, a very strong result at 4K. Medium settings produce 132 FPS with a minimum of 112 and maximum of 151 FPS. High settings reduce the average to 109 FPS, which is still playable but approaches the threshold where motion smoothness could be noticeable. Ultra settings drop to 70 FPS, which is the lowest measured result but remains within the range of acceptable playability for a sports title.

The data shows a clear pattern: performance degrades smoothly as resolution and settings increase, with no dramatic cliffs. This indicates a well-balanced system where both components contribute to the overall result.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution for this combination in Undisputed?*

A: The data shows that 2560x1440 provides an excellent balance. At High settings, the system achieves 172 FPS, and even at Ultra it maintains 111 FPS. This resolution offers high visual quality while keeping frame rates far above the 60 FPS threshold.

*Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Undisputed?*

A: Yes, the system can handle 4K. At High settings, it averages 109 FPS, and at Medium it reaches 132 FPS with a minimum of 112 FPS. Even at Ultra, it maintains 70 FPS, which is playable, though the higher settings may require a lower refresh rate display.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 has an average benchmark score of 64,640. The AMD EPYC 4464P scores 64,823, a delta of -0.3%, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F scores 64,438, a delta of 0.3%. These differences are negligible, indicating the CPU performs on par with these alternatives.

Q: What is the highest frame rate achievable with this combination?

A: The highest measured frame rate is 400 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This represents the absolute ceiling of the system's performance in Undisputed, though most users would prefer higher settings at lower frame rates.

Q: How much performance is lost between 1080p and 4K?

A: At High settings, performance drops from 238 FPS at 1080p to 109 FPS at 4K, a reduction of 129 FPS. At Ultra settings, the drop is from 153 FPS to 70 FPS, a reduction of 83 FPS. The percentage loss varies by settings, with higher settings showing smaller relative drops.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides clear guidance for optimal settings in Undisputed. For users with 1080p displays, Medium settings at 288 FPS offer a strong balance between visual quality and performance. The minimum of 245 FPS ensures smooth gameplay even during intense sequences. High settings at 238 FPS are also viable for those who prioritize visual fidelity, while Ultra at 153 FPS remains playable but may not fully utilize high-refresh-rate monitors.

At 1440p, High settings at 172 FPS provide the best experience. This configuration delivers excellent visual quality while maintaining frame rates well above the 60 FPS standard. Medium settings at 208 FPS are preferable for competitive play where higher refresh rates matter, but the visual difference between Medium and High is notable. Ultra settings at 111 FPS are acceptable, but the performance cost may not justify the marginal visual improvement.

At 4K, Medium settings at 132 FPS with a minimum of 112 FPS represent the best trade-off. This setting provides the highest frame rate with a guaranteed minimum above 100 FPS. High settings at 109 FPS are also viable for users who prefer visual quality, but the lower minimum FPS could be noticeable during fast-paced action. Ultra settings at 70 FPS are playable but may feel less responsive compared to the higher settings.

The data suggests that users should match settings to their display's refresh rate. For 144Hz displays, 1440p High or 4K Medium are optimal. For 240Hz displays, 1080p Medium or 1440p Low are recommended to maximize frame rates.

Resolution Scaling

The performance scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals the system's bottleneck characteristics. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 400 at 1080p to 289 at 1440p and 183 at 4K. This represents a 27.75% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 36.68% drop from 1440p to 4K. The proportional scaling suggests the GPU is the limiting factor at Low settings, as the CPU has sufficient headroom to maintain high frame rates.

At Medium settings, the drop is from 288 FPS at 1080p to 208 FPS at 1440p and 132 FPS at 4K. This shows a 27.78% drop between the first two resolutions and a 36.54% drop between the latter two. The consistency of these percentages indicates that the GPU workload scales predictably with pixel count.

At High settings, the pattern changes. The system achieves 238 FPS at 1080p, 172 FPS at 1440p, and 109 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops are 27.73% and 36.63%, respectively, showing a similar trend to the lower settings. However, at Ultra settings, the scaling is different: 153 FPS at 1080p, 111 FPS at 1440p, and 70 FPS at 4K. The drops are 27.45% and 36.94%, respectively.

The consistent scaling across all settings indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting component at higher resolutions. The CPU's performance remains sufficient to feed the GPU even at 1080p Low, where the system reaches 400 FPS. This suggests that the RTX 5070's 12 GB of VRAM and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth are the key factors determining performance in Undisputed, rather than the CPU's computational capabilities.