Undisputed

Undisputed, the boxing simulation from 2023, is a demanding title that scales heavily with both resolution and graphical presets. The measured data for the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 reveals a configuration that is capable of high refresh rate play at standard resolutions, but which begins to show its limits when pushed to 4K with maximum settings. This analysis breaks down the performance metrics, examining how the CPU and GPU each contribute to the final frame rates across the tested spectrum.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is significant and clearly illustrates the increasing graphical load on the RTX 5060. At the "Low" preset, the average frame rate falls from 235 FPS at 1920x1080 to 107 FPS at 3840x2160, a reduction of 128 FPS. This represents a 54.5% decrease in performance when moving to 4K, a substantial hit that underscores how much the pixel count affects the GPU's workload. The scaling is consistent with a title that is heavily reliant on the graphics card at higher resolutions.

The "High" preset shows a similar pattern of steep scaling. The average frame rate drops from 140 FPS at 1080p to 101 FPS at 1440p, and further down to 64 FPS at 4K. The gap between 1080p and 4K is 76 FPS, or a 54.3% reduction. This consistency across presets suggests that the resolution scaling is the primary factor driving the performance difference, not the specific quality settings themselves. The architecture of the game appears to be uniformly demanding on the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth as the resolution increases.

The scaling pattern indicates that at 1080p, the system is likely not entirely GPU-bound, as the frame rates are exceptionally high, particularly on the "Low" preset. However, as the resolution climbs, the GPU becomes the clear limiting component. The fact that the 4K "Ultra" preset yields just 41 FPS, while the 4K "Low" preset yields 107 FPS, demonstrates that the combination of high resolution and maximum settings places an immense burden on the RTX 5060's 8 GB of GDDR7 memory and its 128-bit memory interface. The data suggests that for consistent 60 FPS gameplay at 4K, users must be willing to significantly reduce graphical fidelity.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is the primary driver of frame rates in this configuration, and its specifications directly correlate with the observed performance. The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The "Medium" preset is the only one with recorded minimum and maximum frame rates, with a minimum of 66 FPS at 4K and 144 FPS at 1080p. This data suggests that the "Medium" preset is a stable point, but the lack of min/max data for other presets makes it difficult to assess frame time consistency across the board.

The GPU's clock speeds are listed with a base of 2280 MHz and a boost of 2497 MHz. These clocks, combined with the 3840 shading units, allow for substantial raw compute performance, reflected in its 19.18 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. In the context of Undisputed, the high frame rates at 1080p, particularly the 235 FPS average on "Low" settings, are a direct result of this compute power not being bottlenecked by memory bandwidth at that resolution. The game's geometry and effects at lower settings are easily handled by the GPU's texture rate of 299.6 GTexel/s.

However, at 4K, the 8 GB VRAM capacity and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth become more critical. The significant frame rate drops at 4K "High" (64 FPS) and "Ultra" (41 FPS) suggest that the GPU is struggling to manage the increased texture data and memory traffic required by the higher resolution. The RTX 5060's performance percentile of 72 places it in a solid mid-range tier, but the data from Undisputed shows that its capabilities are finite. The measured results indicate that the GPU is the clear bottleneck in this pairing, especially when the resolution is set to 3840x2160.

How This Combo Ranks

In the combined CPU and GPU testing database for Undisputed, this specific configuration ranks 1861 out of 2813 total tested combos. This places it in the lower half of all tested systems, which is a noteworthy finding given the individual component specifications. The rank suggests that while each part is capable on its own, their combination yields a result that is not at the top of the performance charts for this particular game.

The ranking position of 1861 indicates that there are 952 other combinations that perform better in this title. This is likely due to the mobile nature of the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, which is designed for power efficiency with a 28 W TDP, potentially limiting sustained performance compared to desktop counterparts. The RTX 5060, while a current-generation GPU, is positioned in the mid-range segment, and its performance is what it is. The combination's rank shows that for Undisputed, this pairing is adequate for smooth gameplay at lower resolutions, but it is not a top-tier performer.

It is important to consider this rank in context with the CPU's own benchmark standing. The Core Ultra 5 125H has an average benchmark score of 27507, which puts it on par with rivals like the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 and Intel Core i5-12600K, with a negligible performance delta of -0.1% and -0.3% respectively. Similarly, the RTX 5060's average benchmark score of 26331 is competitive with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, which has a 1.2% higher score. Despite being competitive in synthetic benchmarks, the combination's rank in Undisputed suggests that the game may be sensitive to specific architectural characteristics or that the system's overall balance is not optimal for this title's engine.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rates provide a comprehensive view of the system's performance across different settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system excels, delivering an average of 235 FPS on "Low" settings. This drops to 169 FPS on "Medium", 140 FPS on "High", and 90 FPS on "Ultra". All of these figures are well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, and the "Medium" preset shows a minimum of 144 FPS, ensuring a consistently high frame rate without significant dips.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows the expected decline. The "Low" preset averages 170 FPS, while "Medium" averages 122 FPS with a minimum of 104 FPS. The "High" preset averages 101 FPS, and "Ultra" drops to 65 FPS. At this resolution, all presets remain playable, but the "Ultra" setting is getting close to the 60 FPS line, indicating that it may not be the best choice for users with high refresh rate monitors who demand absolute smoothness.

At 3840x2160, the performance takes a more pronounced hit. The "Low" preset averages 107 FPS, which is still respectable. However, "Medium" drops to 77 FPS with a minimum of 66 FPS, and "High" averages 64 FPS. The "Ultra" preset is the most demanding, producing an average of only 41 FPS, which is below the standard for comfortable gameplay. This data clearly shows that 4K "Ultra" is not a viable option for this configuration, and even 4K "High" may feel inconsistent for some users, given its average is just above the 60 FPS mark.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this configuration to achieve consistently high frame rates?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 provides the highest frame rates, with all presets averaging above 90 FPS. For a target of 144 FPS or higher, the "Low" and "Medium" presets are the only options that reliably meet this, with averages of 235 FPS and 169 FPS respectively.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Undisputed?

A: Yes, but with significant compromises. At 4K, the "Low" preset averages 107 FPS, and "Medium" averages 77 FPS. However, the "High" preset only averages 64 FPS, and "Ultra" drops to 41 FPS, making the highest settings unplayable for a smooth experience.

Q: How does the "Ultra" preset performance compare between 1080p and 4K?

A: The "Ultra" preset sees a dramatic reduction in performance. At 1080p, it averages 90 FPS, which is playable. At 4K, the average falls to 41 FPS, a 54.4% decrease, demonstrating the immense graphical load of combining maximum settings with a high resolution.

Q: Is the "High" preset a good choice for a 1440p monitor?

A: The "High" preset at 2560x1440 averages 101 FPS. This is a good frame rate for most users, providing a smooth experience on standard 60 Hz monitors and a solid experience on 100 Hz displays. It is a better choice than "Ultra", which averages only 65 FPS.

Q: What is the performance difference between the "Low" and "Ultra" presets at 1080p?

A: At 1080p, the "Low" preset averages 235 FPS, while the "Ultra" preset averages 90 FPS. This is a difference of 145 FPS, or 61.7% lower performance for the "Ultra" preset, highlighting the significant cost of enabling all the visual features.

Q: Where does this combination rank compared to all other tested systems?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H and RTX 5060 combination ranks 1861 out of 2813 tested combos for Undisputed. This places it in the lower half of all systems, indicating that there is a substantial number of configurations that deliver higher performance in this specific title.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the user's target resolution and refresh rate. For users with a 1080p monitor, the "High" preset offers an excellent balance of visual quality and performance, averaging 140 FPS. For those with high refresh rate panels seeking maximum smoothness, the "Medium" preset is a strong choice, providing an average of 169 FPS with a minimum of 144 FPS, ensuring the frame rate rarely drops below the 144 Hz threshold.

At 1440p, the "High" preset is the recommended choice, as it delivers an average of 101 FPS, which is well-suited for most gaming experiences. The "Ultra" preset, with an average of 65 FPS, is also viable for users who prioritize visual fidelity over frame rate, but it may not be ideal for fast-paced action. The data indicates that the "Medium" preset, averaging 122 FPS, is the safest option for a consistently smooth experience at this resolution.

For 4K gaming, the "Low" preset is the only recommended option for a consistently smooth experience, averaging 107 FPS. The "Medium" preset, with an average of 77 FPS and a minimum of 66 FPS, is also playable, though users may notice occasional frame drops. The "High" preset at 64 FPS is borderline, and it is advisable to avoid the "Ultra" preset entirely, as the 41 FPS average will result in a stuttery and unresponsive experience. The data suggests that for 4K, users should prioritize frame rate and use the "Low" or "Medium" presets to get the best experience from this hardware.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H plays a supporting role in this configuration, and its performance is sufficient to avoid becoming a major bottleneck in Undisputed. The CPU features 14 cores and 18 threads, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. This multi-threaded capability is reflected in its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12804.5, which is a solid result for a mobile processor. In a game like Undisputed, which is a sports title, the CPU's role is primarily to manage game logic and physics, and this processor appears well-equipped for the task.

The CPU's single-thread performance is also important for gaming. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1647.5 and Passmark single-thread score of 3399 indicate that it has strong per-core performance. This is crucial for maintaining high frame rates, as many game engines rely on a few primary threads for rendering commands. The data implies that the CPU is not the limiting factor in the lower resolution tests, as the frame rates achieved at 1080p are exceptionally high, suggesting the GPU is the primary constraint.

However, the mobile nature of the processor, with a 28 W TDP, should be considered. While its benchmark scores are comparable to desktop parts like the AMD Ryzen 7 5800, the sustained performance may be limited by thermal and power constraints in a laptop chassis. In the context of Undisputed, the measured results show that the CPU is capable of feeding the RTX 5060 enough data to achieve high frame rates, particularly at lower resolutions. The configuration's overall rank of 1861 out of 2813 combos suggests that while the CPU is not a weak link, the overall system balance may not be ideal for pushing the highest possible frame rates in this specific title, where other combinations of desktop CPUs and higher-tier GPUs likely take the top spots.