Undisputed

Undisputed, the boxing simulation title, presents a demanding workload that separates hardware combinations decisively. The pairing of the Intel Core i7-12700KF with the Intel Arc B370 produces a system that is fundamentally limited by its graphics processor at most settings. The data indicates that this configuration ranks at position 2592 out of 2813 tested combinations for this specific game, placing it in the bottom tier of performance. While the processor is a high-end desktop part with a benchmark percentile of 85, the graphics solution is an integrated-class component with a percentile of just 5, creating a stark imbalance that dictates the gaming experience.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is severe and clearly illustrates that the Intel Arc B370 is the bottleneck in this configuration. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 68 FPS at 1920x1080 to 49 FPS at 2560x1440, and finally to 31 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 54% reduction in average FPS when moving from 1080p to 4K. For a component with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1184, this scaling is expected; the rendering load at 4K simply overwhelms the GPU's 6.144 TFLOPS of compute power.

The scaling pattern is consistent across all presets. At Low settings, the frame rate drops from 115 FPS at 1080p to 83 FPS at 1440p, settling at 52 FPS at 4K. The Medium preset shows a similar trajectory, with averages of 83, 60, and 38 FPS across the three resolutions. The Ultra preset, which pushes the system to its limits, sees average frame rates of 44, 32, and 20 FPS respectively. The progression from 1080p to 1440p typically incurs a 25-30% performance penalty, while the jump to 4K adds another 35-40% reduction, highlighting how the GPU's memory bandwidth, being system-dependent, cannot keep pace with the increasing pixel count.

The data strongly suggests that 4K gaming is not a viable target for this combo. Even at Low settings, the 52 FPS average at 3840x2160 is borderline, and any demanding scene could cause noticeable stuttering. The limiting component is unequivocally the GPU, as the CPU's performance metrics, such as a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28838 and a single-core score of 4071, indicate it has ample headroom to process game logic and physics at these resolutions. The frame rate deltas between settings at the same resolution are far more significant than any CPU-bound variation would be.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B370 is the decisive factor in this system's performance, and its specifications reveal why. Operating with a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, it offers 1280 shading units. Its memory configuration is "System Shared," meaning it relies on the system's main memory rather than dedicated VRAM. This architecture results in a memory bandwidth that is "System Dependent," which is a critical weakness for a game like Undisputed that likely requires rapid texture streaming.

The GPU's benchmark results are modest, with an average score of 1184 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. This places it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals are legacy parts like the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 and the ATI Radeon HD 5770, with score deltas of -0.2% and -0.5% respectively. This context is crucial; the Arc B370 is not competing with modern discrete graphics cards but is instead positioned at the very entry level of performance. The data shows it performs 1.4% better than the AMD FirePro M2000, another older workstation component.

The impact on game settings is clear when examining the 1440p results. At Medium settings, the system produces a 60 FPS average with a minimum of 51 FPS, which is a playable experience. However, moving to High settings at the same resolution drops the average to 49 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 32 FPS. The GPU's 20 ROPs and 40 TMUs are insufficient to handle the increased shading and texture complexity of higher presets. The 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate and 96.00 GTexel/s texture rate are simply too low for sustained high-detail rendering, making the Low to Medium preset range the practical limit for this GPU.

CPU Role

In contrast to the GPU, the Intel Core i7-12700KF is an exceptionally capable processor that is not the bottleneck in this configuration. With 12 cores and 20 threads, it provides substantial parallel processing power. Its architecture is Alder Lake, built on a 10 nm process, and it features a base clock of 3.60 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. This combination of high core count and high clock speed is well-suited for modern games that can utilize multiple threads for AI, physics, and streaming.

The CPU's benchmark scores are robust. It achieves a Geekbench multi-core score of 14367 and a single-core score of 2255. In Cinebench R23, it scores 28838 multi-core and 4071 single-core. These numbers place it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, and its average benchmark score of 35365 is nearly identical to its closest rivals, such as the Intel Core i7-13700T and the Intel Core i5-13600T, with deltas of -0.1% and 0.2% respectively. This demonstrates that the processing power is on par with much newer and more efficient parts.

The data indicates that the CPU has plenty of headroom in Undisputed. Since the frame rates are so heavily influenced by the GPU at higher settings, the CPU is likely idling, waiting for the graphics card to finish rendering. Even at 1080p Low, where the GPU is less stressed, the 115 FPS average is likely still below what the CPU could theoretically deliver. The processor's rapid 5.00 GHz boost clock and high single-thread performance ensure that the game's core logic is processed without delay, but this speed is wasted when the GPU can only produce 20 FPS at 4K Ultra.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured data, the optimal experience for this combination is at 1920x1080 with the Medium preset. This configuration yields an average frame rate of 83 FPS, with a minimum of 70 FPS and a maximum of 95 FPS. This provides a smooth and responsive experience that is well above the threshold for comfortable play, and the frametime variance is acceptable. While the Low preset at 1080p produces a higher average of 115 FPS, the visual fidelity drop is significant, and the Medium preset offers a much better balance of image quality and performance.

For users with a 1440p monitor, the Medium preset is the only viable option for a consistent experience. It achieves an average of 60 FPS, exactly on par with standard display refresh rates, and a minimum of 51 FPS which keeps most scenes playable. The High preset at this resolution is risky, as the 49 FPS average is likely to feel less fluid. At 4K, the situation is grim; the Low preset is the only one that approaches playability with a 52 FPS average, but the visual compromise is substantial.

The Ultra preset is not recommended at any resolution. The data shows it is only able to produce 44 FPS at 1080p, 32 FPS at 1440p, and 20 FPS at 4K. These frame rates are too low for a fast-paced sports title where timing is crucial. The measured minimum FPS data is only available for the Medium preset, but the average FPS for Ultra suggests that the system is at its absolute limit, likely producing stutters and inconsistent frame pacing. The verdict is clear: stick to Medium settings for a playable frame rate, or drop to Low if the resolution is more important than visual quality.

FAQ

Q: Is this system capable of running Undisputed at 4K resolution?

A: The data shows it is not capable of a smooth experience. At 4K, the highest average FPS is 52 at Low settings. Medium settings drop to 38 FPS, and Ultra falls to 20 FPS. These results are below the threshold for comfortable, consistent gameplay.

Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for this hardware?

A: The best measured performance is at 1920x1080 with Medium settings, which yields an average of 83 FPS and a minimum of 70 FPS. This provides the best balance between visual quality and smoothness. At 1440p, Medium is the only acceptable preset, averaging 60 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU performance compare to its competitors?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700KF has an average benchmark score of 35365, which is nearly identical to its nearest rivals. It is 0.2% faster than the Intel Core i5-13600T and 0.2% faster than the Intel Core i7-12700K, while being 0.1% slower than the Intel Core i7-13700T.

Q: Why is the performance so low despite having a powerful CPU?

A: The system is bottlenecked by the Intel Arc B370, which has a low performance percentile of 5. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score is only 1184, and it relies on system-shared memory, which limits its bandwidth. The CPU's high benchmark scores are irrelevant when the GPU cannot render frames fast enough.

Q: Is there a significant performance difference between Low and Medium settings?

A: Yes. At 1080p, the Low preset averages 115 FPS, while Medium averages 83 FPS. This is a 32 FPS difference. At 1440p, the gap is 23 FPS (83 vs 60), and at 4K it is 14 FPS (52 vs 38). The visual quality improvement from Low to Medium is substantial, making the frame rate trade-off worthwhile.

Q: What does the frame rate data suggest about the GPU's memory?

A: The GPU uses "System Shared" memory with "System Dependent" bandwidth. This is a major limitation. The significant frame rate drops at higher resolutions and settings indicate that the GPU is struggling with memory bandwidth, as it must compete with the CPU for system memory access.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table details the exact measured average FPS, with minimum and maximum values where available, for each resolution and settings preset.

1920x1080 (1080p)

• Low: 115 FPS average
• Medium: 83 FPS average, 70 FPS minimum, 95 FPS maximum
• High: 68 FPS average
• Ultra: 44 FPS average

2560x1440 (1440p)

• Low: 83 FPS average
• Medium: 60 FPS average, 51 FPS minimum, 69 FPS maximum
• High: 49 FPS average
• Ultra: 32 FPS average

3840x2160 (4K)

• Low: 52 FPS average
• Medium: 38 FPS average, 32 FPS minimum, 43 FPS maximum
• High: 31 FPS average
• Ultra: 20 FPS average

The data reveals a consistent pattern where the Medium preset is the highest setting that provides a playable frame rate. The High and Ultra presets are only suitable for static screenshots, not for active gameplay. The minimum FPS data, available only for Medium, shows that even this preset can dip below its average, but the 51 FPS minimum at 1440p is still within a playable range. The system's overall ranking of 2592 out of 2813 combinations confirms its status as a low-performance option for this specific title.