Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F paired with the Intel Arc B370 is a combination that targets a very specific corner of the PC gaming market. The CPU is a solid mainstream desktop part, while the GPU is an integrated graphics solution with a low power envelope. The benchmark data for Undisputed reveals a system that can handle the game at lower settings and resolutions, but struggles to maintain smooth frame rates at higher presets. This analysis will break down the measured performance, ranking, and settings recommendations based exclusively on the provided data.

FAQ

*Q: What is the overall rank of this CPU and GPU combo in Undisputed?*

A: The combo ranks 2592 out of 2813 tested combinations. This places it in the bottom percentile of all tested systems, indicating that it is not a high-performance configuration for this game.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F compare to its nearest rivals in general benchmark scores?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 36945. This is nearly identical to the Intel Core Ultra 5 225, which scores 36938 with a deltaPct of 0. It is also only 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D and 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450. The CPU's performance is essentially on par with these parts.

*Q: What is the best measured average FPS this combo achieves in Undisputed?*

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 115 at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This is the only measured configuration to exceed the 100 FPS mark.

Q: What is the worst measured average FPS for this combo?

A: The lowest average FPS recorded is 20 at 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings. This is the only measured configuration to drop below 30 FPS.

Q: Does the Intel Arc B370 have its own dedicated VRAM?

A: No. The memory size, type, and bus width are all listed as "System Shared". The memory bandwidth is also "System Dependent", meaning it relies on the system's main memory rather than a dedicated pool of graphics memory.

Q: What is the FPS range for the Medium settings preset at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the combo achieves an average of 60 FPS, with a minimum of 51 FPS and a maximum of 69 FPS. This is the only resolution where a min/max range is provided for the Medium preset.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) belonging to the Arc Graphics-M generation based on the Xe3-LPG architecture. It is built on a 3 nm process node from Intel. Its performance characteristics are a major limiting factor for this combo. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark score is 1184, which places it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs. This is a very low score, indicating entry-level or integrated-level graphics capability.

Its nearest rivals in benchmark scores are older discrete cards, such as the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 and the ATI Radeon HD 5770, with scores of 1186 and 1190, respectively. The B370 is only 0.2% slower than the HD 5570 and 0.5% slower than the HD 5770. This context is crucial; the B370's performance is comparable to graphics hardware from over a decade ago, which explains its struggles in modern titles.

The GPU has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. It features 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 20 render output units (ROPs). It also has 10 ray tracing cores. Its theoretical pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s, with an FP32 performance of 6.144 TFLOPS. The memory type is "System Shared", meaning it has no dedicated VRAM. This is a significant handicap.

In Undisputed, the lack of dedicated VRAM and the low overall GPU compute power directly impact performance. The data shows that the combo is more capable at lower settings, where the rendering load is reduced. The jump from Low to Ultra settings at any resolution incurs a massive performance penalty. For instance, at 1080p, average FPS drops from 115 on Low to 44 on Ultra. This 71 FPS difference demonstrates how quickly the GPU becomes the bottleneck as graphical demands increase. The shared system memory also means that the GPU is competing with the CPU for memory bandwidth, which can cause stuttering and frame drops in demanding scenes.

How This Combo Ranks

The data places this specific CPU and GPU combination at rank 2592 out of 2813 tested combos in Undisputed. This is a very low ranking, putting it in the bottom 8% of all tested systems. This rank is a direct result of the GPU's limitations. While the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is a capable processor, its performance is effectively neutralized by the integrated Arc B370.

The CPU's own benchmark data shows it is a solid mid-range part. It has a percentile of 85 versus all CPUs and is closely matched with rivals like the Intel Core Ultra 5 225. However, the GPU's percentile of 5 is what drags the entire system down. The combo's rank of 2592 is more indicative of the GPU's standing than the CPU's. In this configuration, the GPU is the primary constraint, and the system's overall performance in Undisputed reflects that.

This rank means that for most gaming purposes, this combo will be outperformed by the vast majority of systems in the database. It is not a configuration for high-refresh-rate competitive play or for maxing out graphical settings. Instead, it is best suited for low-impact gaming or as a basic system where gaming is not a primary function. The rank of 2592 is a clear signal that users should have modest expectations for this hardware combination.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at how this combo performs across various resolutions and settings. All data points are average FPS unless otherwise specified.

1920x1080:

• Low: The best result here is 115 FPS. This is the only setting at 1080p that provides a high-refresh-rate experience.
• Medium: Average FPS is 83, with a minimum of 70 and a maximum of 95. This is a playable result, though it represents a significant drop from Low.
• High: Average FPS is 68. This is a 47 FPS drop from Low, showing a steep scaling cost.
• Ultra: Average FPS is 44. This is the lowest result at 1080p and is not ideal for smooth gameplay.

2560x1440:

• Low: Average FPS is 83. This is a 32 FPS drop from the 1080p Low result.
• Medium: Average FPS is 60, with a minimum of 51 and a maximum of 69. This is a borderline playable result, hitting the 60 FPS target on average.
• High: Average FPS is 49. This is a significant drop from the 1080p High result.
• Ultra: Average FPS is 32. This is a steep decline from the Medium result and is not a smooth experience.

3840x2160:

• Low: Average FPS is 52. This is the only 4K setting that is remotely playable.
• Medium: Average FPS is 38, with a minimum of 32 and a maximum of 43. This is below the 60 FPS target.
• High: Average FPS is 31. This is a low result that will be noticeable as stutter.
• Ultra: Average FPS is 20. This is the worst result in the entire dataset and is unplayable.

The data shows a clear pattern. At every resolution, the Low preset is the only one that can maintain a high frame rate. The gap between Low and Medium is substantial, and the gap between Medium and High is also significant. The Ultra preset is consistently a performance killer at all resolutions.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS data shows how the system scales from 1080p to 4K. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 115 at 1080p to 83 at 1440p and then to 52 at 4K. This is a 55% drop from 1080p to 4K. At Medium settings, the average FPS drops from 83 at 1080p to 60 at 1440p and then to 38 at 4K. This is a 54% drop from 1080p to 4K.

These scaling patterns are typical for a system that is heavily GPU-limited. As the resolution increases, the number of pixels the GPU must render increases exponentially. The fact that the FPS drops by roughly half when moving from 1080p to 4K indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck. A system that is CPU-limited would show a smaller performance drop at higher resolutions because the CPU's workload would not increase as much.

The data also shows that the scaling is not perfectly linear. At Low settings, the drop from 1080p to 1440p is 32 FPS, while the drop from 1440p to 4K is 31 FPS. This is a fairly consistent scaling pattern. At Medium settings, the drop from 1080p to 1440p is 23 FPS, while the drop from 1440p to 4K is 22 FPS. This consistency suggests that the GPU is being pushed to its limits at all resolutions, with no other component stepping in to mitigate the load.

The CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, is a 6-core, 12-thread processor with a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. Its benchmark scores, such as a single-thread score of 2872 and a multithread score of 19236, indicate it is a strong processor. However, the data shows that even at 1080p with Low settings, the system is not producing the kind of frame rates that would suggest a CPU bottleneck. The GPU is clearly the limiting factor, as evidenced by the steep performance drops with increased resolution.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the user's target resolution and performance expectations.

For a 1080p display, the Low preset is the clear recommendation for a high-refresh-rate experience, delivering 115 FPS. This is the only way to fully utilize a 100+ Hz monitor. If a user prefers higher visual fidelity, the Medium preset is a viable alternative, with an average of 83 FPS. This is still a smooth experience for most games. The High preset at 68 FPS is also playable, but the drop from Medium to High is 15 FPS, which is a significant cost for the visual upgrade. The Ultra preset at 44 FPS is not recommended, as it falls below the 60 FPS target and may feel less responsive.

For a 1440p display, the Low preset is the only way to achieve a high frame rate, with an average of 83 FPS. The Medium preset averages 60 FPS, which is the accepted standard for smooth gameplay, but it does have a minimum of 51 FPS, indicating there will be dips below 60. The High preset at 49 FPS is playable but not ideal for fast-paced action. The Ultra preset at 32 FPS is not recommended.

For a 4K display, the data is less encouraging. The Low preset is the only one that achieves a playable frame rate, with an average of 52 FPS. The Medium preset at 38 FPS is playable but will have noticeable stutter. High and Ultra presets at 31 and 20 FPS, respectively, are not viable options.

The best overall experience per the measured data is at 1080p with the Low preset. This provides the highest performance margin. For users who prefer a balance between performance and visual quality, 1080p with Medium settings is the recommended compromise. The data indicates that this combo is not suited for high-resolution, high-settings gaming. Players should expect to use Low or Medium settings to get a smooth experience. The Ultra preset is universally a poor choice with this hardware, causing the frame rate to plummet at every resolution.