Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a highly capable 1080p and 1440p experience in Undisputed, but 4K Ultra remains a challenge. The data indicates that the "High" preset is the optimal balance for most users, offering a smooth 116 FPS at 1080p and a very playable 84 FPS at 1440p, while the "Ultra" preset at 4K falls below the 60 FPS threshold. This pairing ranks in the 20th percentile of all tested combos, placing it in a competitive but not elite tier for this title.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data strongly suggests that the "High" preset is the sweet spot for this hardware combination. It provides a significant performance buffer over "Ultra" while maintaining visual fidelity. At 1920x1080, the "High" preset delivers 116 FPS, which is more than sufficient for a smooth, responsive experience. Moving to 2560x1440, the average drops to 84 FPS, which remains well within the playable range for a sports title, ensuring that animations and gameplay remain fluid.

While the "Low" preset offers the highest frame rates—195 FPS at 1080p and 141 FPS at 1440p—it does so at a considerable visual cost. The data shows that the jump from "Low" to "Medium" at 1080p is a 46 FPS reduction (from 195 to 141 FPS), but this trade-off is likely worth it for the improved graphical detail. At 4K, the "Low" preset is the only one that breaks the 60 FPS barrier, achieving 89 FPS, which indicates that for 4K gaming, players must make a clear choice between visual quality and performance.

The "Medium" preset is a viable alternative, offering a good middle ground. At 1080p, it delivers 141 FPS, and at 1440p, it hits 102 FPS with a minimum of 86 FPS, showcasing a stable frame pacing. However, "High" offers a better balance of visual quality and performance, as the step from "Medium" to "High" at 1080p only costs 25 FPS (from 141 to 116 FPS), a smaller penalty than the jump from "Low" to "Medium". The "Ultra" preset is the most demanding, with scores dropping to 75 FPS at 1080p, 54 FPS at 1440p, and 34 FPS at 4K. These numbers indicate that "Ultra" is only suitable for 1080p gaming on this combo, and even then, it sacrifices a substantial amount of performance for marginal visual gains.

For the best experience, the data recommends the "High" preset at 1080p or 1440p. This configuration provides a high frame rate that fully utilizes the capabilities of the hardware without pushing it to its limits. The 4K resolution is best reserved for the "Low" preset if a high refresh rate is the priority, as the other presets fail to provide a consistently smooth experience.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for a 60 FPS experience?

A: The data shows that the "High" preset at 2560x1440 delivers 84 FPS, and the "Ultra" preset at 1920x1080 delivers 75 FPS. For a locked 60 FPS, the "High" preset at 1440p is the safest choice, as it has a significant buffer above the 60 FPS threshold. At 4K, only the "Low" preset, with 89 FPS, achieves a comfortable margin above 60 FPS.

Q: How does the "Ultra" preset compare to "High" in terms of performance cost?

A: The performance cost is substantial. At 1080p, the average FPS drops from 116 on "High" to 75 on "Ultra", a 41 FPS reduction. At 1440p, the drop is from 84 to 54 FPS. At 4K, the drop is even more severe, from 53 to 34 FPS. This indicates that "Ultra" settings place a significant strain on the GPU.

Q: Is this combination capable of 4K gaming?

A: Yes, but with limitations. The measured data shows that at 3840x2160, the "Low" preset achieves 89 FPS, and the "Medium" preset achieves 64 FPS. The "High" preset is borderline at 53 FPS, and "Ultra" is not playable at 34 FPS. Therefore, 4K is viable only on lower settings.

Q: How stable is the frame rate on the "Medium" preset?

A: The data provides minimum and maximum FPS values for the "Medium" preset. At 1080p, the average is 141 FPS with a minimum of 120 FPS and a maximum of 162 FPS. At 1440p, the average is 102 FPS with a minimum of 86 FPS and a maximum of 117 FPS. At 4K, the average is 64 FPS with a minimum of 55 FPS and a maximum of 74 FPS. This shows a stable performance profile with no severe dips.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5700G's performance compare to its nearest rivals in general benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700G has an average benchmark score of 27051. This puts it virtually on par with the Intel Core i9-9900K, which scores 27097 (a 0.2% difference). It is also closely matched with the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, which scores 26936 (0.4% higher for the 5700G), and the Intel Core i5-14400T, which scores 27166 (0.4% lower for the 5700G).

Q: What is the performance delta between this GPU and its closest rival?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, scores 20534, making the B570 0.1% faster. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, making it 0.1% faster than the B570. These are near-identical performance levels.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G and Intel Arc B570 combination is ranked 2256 out of 2813 tested combos for Undisputed. This places it in the lower half of the database, specifically around the 20th percentile. This ranking suggests that while the combination is fully capable of running the game, there are many other hardware pairings that can achieve higher frame rates, particularly at higher resolutions and settings.

This rank is a holistic measure that considers all tested resolutions and settings. The combo's strength lies in its 1080p and 1440p performance, where it can deliver high refresh rates on "High" settings. However, its performance at 4K on higher presets drags down its overall standing, as many other combos can handle 4K more effectively. The data shows that the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K, as its performance scales down significantly with increased resolution, a point reinforced by the fact that the CPU is a high-end 8-core part.

The rank of 2256 indicates that for a user prioritizing 1080p or 1440p gaming on a high refresh rate monitor, this combination offers a great experience. However, for those seeking a top-tier 4K experience, this pairing would not be a top recommendation. It sits in a competitive mid-range tier, outperforming many older or lower-end combinations but being outclassed by more powerful CPUs and GPUs.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of the performance envelope. At 1920x1080, the combination starts strong. On "Low" settings, it achieves a very high 195 FPS. The "Medium" preset delivers 141 FPS, with a minimum of 120 FPS and a maximum of 162 FPS. The "High" preset is still excellent, with an average of 116 FPS. The "Ultra" preset brings the average down to 75 FPS, which is still playable but shows the cost of maximum graphical fidelity.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down as expected. The "Low" preset produces 141 FPS, a 54 FPS drop from 1080p. "Medium" yields 102 FPS, with a minimum of 86 FPS, indicating a solid experience. "High" settings result in 84 FPS, which is the recommended setting for a high-refresh 1440p monitor. The "Ultra" preset falls to 54 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck. The "Low" preset is the only one that provides a high frame rate, at 89 FPS. "Medium" drops to 64 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS line. "High" settings only manage 53 FPS, and "Ultra" falls to 34 FPS, which is not a playable experience for a fast-paced game. The lack of min/max data for most 4K presets suggests the frame pacing is less consistent at this resolution.

Resolution Scaling

The data illustrates a classic resolution scaling curve, with the GPU being the limiting factor. From 1080p to 1440p on "High" settings, the average FPS drops from 116 to 84, a 32 FPS or 27.6% reduction. This is a significant hit, but the resulting 84 FPS is still a good score. From 1080p to 4K on "High", the drop is much more severe, falling to 53 FPS, a 63 FPS or 54.3% reduction from the 1080p score.

This scaling pattern is typical for a mid-range GPU. The Intel Arc B570 has 10 GB of memory and a 160-bit bus, which are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p but can become strained at 4K. The increase in pixel count from 1080p to 4K is fourfold, and the FPS does not scale linearly, showing the GPU's computational limits are being reached. The fact that the "Low" preset at 4K (89 FPS) is comparable to the "High" preset at 1440p (84 FPS) further demonstrates that the GPU is the primary constraint at higher resolutions.

The CPU's role in this scaling is minimal. The Ryzen 7 5700G is a powerful 8-core processor, and the frame rate drops are consistent with a GPU-bound scenario. This is evidenced by the significant performance difference between presets at the same resolution, which is a GPU-dependent variable. The data indicates that to achieve higher frame rates at 4K, a more powerful GPU would be required, as the current setup is hitting its performance ceiling.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture. It has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. In the context of Undisputed, a sports title that likely benefits from multiple threads for simulation and AI, this CPU provides ample processing power. Its benchmark results are strong, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12830.5 and a single-core score of 1494.

The CPU's performance relative to its rivals is remarkably tight. Its average benchmark score is 27051, which is within 0.6% of its nearest competitor, the Intel Core i7-1370P. It is essentially tied with the Intel Core i9-9900K and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445. This indicates that the 5700G is a very competitive processor in its class, and it is unlikely to be a bottleneck in Undisputed.

The data supports this conclusion. At 1080p on "Low" settings, the combo hits 195 FPS, which is a very high frame rate that would stress the CPU's ability to feed the GPU. However, the fact that it achieves this score shows that the 8-core, 16-thread configuration is more than sufficient for this game. The performance drops at higher resolutions are solely attributable to the GPU's workload, as the CPU's frame generation capability remains constant. The 16 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel memory support provide a solid foundation for gaming workloads. In this pairing, the CPU is a strong, stable anchor that allows the GPU to be the primary determinant of visual performance.