Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 combination delivers a dominant performance in Undisputed, placing in the top tier of all tested configurations. With a combo rank of 182 out of 2,813 tested pairings, this system sits in the 94th percentile, indicating that it outperforms the vast majority of hardware combinations in this sports title. The pairing of a 6-core Zen 4 processor with a flagship Blackwell GPU yields frame rates that are consistently high across all resolution and settings combinations, making it a formidable choice for high-refresh-rate gaming.

How This Combo Ranks

The data places this specific CPU-GPU pairing at rank 182 out of 2,813 combos tested in Undisputed. This top-7% placement underscores the synergy between the Ryzen 5 7400F and the RTX 5080 in this particular game. The CPU itself holds an 83rd percentile ranking against all processors in the database, while the GPU sits at the 87th percentile against all graphics cards, suggesting that both components are well above average and their combined performance is greater than the sum of their parts for this title.

Benchmark results indicate that the CPU's average benchmark score of 32,750 places it in a tight competitive cluster. The nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14600T with an average score of 32,707 (a 0.1% difference), the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H at 32,697 (0.2% difference), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H at 32,812 (-0.2% difference). This shows the 7400F is effectively performance-neutral against these competitors in synthetic workloads, yet the real-world gaming results in Undisputed are where this combo distinguishes itself.

For the GPU, the RTX 5080's average benchmark score of 56,083 places it ahead of several close rivals. The AMD Radeon 8060S trails by 0.6%, the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 0.7% behind, and the Radeon Pro W5700X is 2.3% slower. The only competitor ahead is the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE, which leads by 2.2%. This competitive positioning in synthetic tests translates into the high measured frame rates seen in the game-specific data, where the combination proves exceptionally capable.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using a 5 nm process at TSMC, featuring the GB203 chip with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. Its 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s, which is crucial for feeding the 10,752 shading units at high resolutions. The card's base clock is 2,295 MHz with a boost clock of 2,617 MHz, while the memory operates at 1,875 MHz (30 Gbps effective). These specifications explain the card's ability to maintain high frame rates even at 4K resolution.

In Undisputed, the GPU's role is pivotal, as evidenced by the substantial frame rate differences between settings at the same resolution. At 4K, the RTX 5080 produces 227 FPS on Low settings but drops to 87 FPS on Ultra, a 62% reduction that highlights how dramatically the card's workload increases with visual fidelity. The card's 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores, while not directly benchmarked in this title, contribute to its overall capability, and its 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance provides ample compute headroom for the game's physics and rendering demands.

The GPU's texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s are high enough that the card rarely becomes the bottleneck in this pairing. The measured data shows that at 1080p, the combo reaches 497 FPS on Low settings, suggesting that the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient to keep the GPU fed. The RTX 5080's 360 W TDP and dual-slot design indicate a power-hungry but manageable card, and its PCIe 5.0 x16 interface ensures no bandwidth limitations with the Ryzen 5 7400F's Gen 5 support.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the High preset at 1440p offers the best balance of visual quality and performance for most users. At 2560x1440 with High settings, the combo delivers 214 FPS, which is well above the 144 Hz refresh rate common on high-end monitors. This represents a 56% improvement over the Ultra preset's 137 FPS at the same resolution, while only sacrificing some shadow and texture quality that is often imperceptible during fast-paced boxing matches.

For 4K gaming, the Medium preset at 3840x2160 is the recommended starting point, producing 163 FPS with a minimum of 139 FPS and a maximum of 188 FPS. This is the only 4K setting with recorded minimum and maximum values, indicating consistent frame pacing. The High preset at 4K drops to 135 FPS, which is still playable, but the Medium setting provides a more comfortable margin above the 120 Hz threshold. The Ultra preset at 4K, at 87 FPS, is only suitable for players who prioritize maximum visual fidelity over smoothness.

At 1080p, the High preset at 296 FPS is the sweet spot, as it provides more than double the refresh rate of most monitors while maintaining high visual quality. The Medium preset at 357 FPS and Low at 497 FPS offer diminishing returns unless the player has a 360 Hz or higher display. The Ultra preset at 190 FPS is also viable, but the performance gain from dropping to High is minimal in real-world terms. The data suggests that High is the optimal preset across all resolutions, with Medium as a fallback for 4K users who want extra headroom.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo shows exceptional scaling across settings. Low settings produce 497 FPS, Medium drops to 357 FPS with a minimum of 304 FPS and a maximum of 411 FPS, High reaches 296 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 190 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra represents a 62% reduction in frame rate, but even the lowest figure is far above competitive thresholds. The Medium preset's recorded range of 304-411 FPS shows tight frame pacing, which is critical for a sports title where timing matters.

Moving to 2560x1440, the same pattern emerges with lower absolute numbers. Low settings yield 359 FPS, Medium delivers 258 FPS with a 219-297 FPS range, High produces 214 FPS, and Ultra drops to 137 FPS. The 1440p results show that the RTX 5080 remains highly capable, with even the Ultra preset exceeding 120 FPS. The Medium range of 219-297 FPS indicates that the game remains smooth under load, and the 42% drop from Low to Ultra is consistent with the 1080p results.

At 3840x2160, the performance impact becomes more pronounced. Low settings still manage 227 FPS, Medium falls to 163 FPS with a 139-188 FPS range, High reaches 135 FPS, and Ultra drops to 87 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is the only sub-100 FPS figure in the entire dataset, representing a 62% decrease from Low settings. The Medium preset's minimum of 139 FPS ensures that even during intense gameplay moments, the frame rate stays above the 120 Hz threshold, making it the most reliable 4K option.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate degradation from 1080p to 4K reveals important information about the limiting component in this combo. At Low settings, the drop from 497 FPS at 1080p to 227 FPS at 4K represents a 54% reduction. This significant scaling suggests that even at the lowest settings, the GPU is being taxed by the increased pixel count, but the CPU is not the primary bottleneck since the frame rates remain exceptionally high.

At Medium settings, the transition from 357 FPS at 1080p to 163 FPS at 4K shows a 54% decrease, nearly identical to the Low setting scaling. This consistency indicates that the RTX 5080's rendering pipeline scales predictably with resolution, and the Ryzen 5 7400F's 6 cores with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz are sufficient to avoid CPU limitations even at the lower resolutions where frame rates exceed 350 FPS.

The High and Ultra presets show similar scaling patterns, with High dropping from 296 FPS at 1080p to 135 FPS at 4K (a 54% reduction) and Ultra falling from 190 FPS to 87 FPS (a 54% reduction). This uniform scaling across all settings strongly suggests that the GPU is the limiting component throughout, as the CPU's performance headroom is not exhausted even at 1080p Low with 497 FPS. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth of the CPU's dual-channel DDR5 support appears ample, and the 32 MB shared L3 cache helps maintain consistent frame delivery.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for this CPU-GPU pairing in Undisputed?*

A: The measured data shows that 2560x1440 with High settings provides 214 FPS, making it the optimal balance for most players. For 4K, Medium settings at 163 FPS with a minimum of 139 FPS offers the most consistent experience, while 1080p High at 296 FPS is ideal for ultra-high refresh rate displays.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7400F compare to its nearest CPU rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The 7400F scores 32,750 in average benchmark score, placing it 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14600T (32,707), 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32,697), and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32,662). It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H by 0.2% (32,812).

*Q: Is the RTX 5080's 16 GB VRAM sufficient for Undisputed at 4K?*

A: The measured results indicate that 16 GB of GDDR7 memory with 960.0 GB/s bandwidth is more than adequate. At 4K Ultra, the combo still produces 87 FPS, and at 4K High it reaches 135 FPS, showing no VRAM-related performance dips.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, Low settings produce 497 FPS while Ultra drops to 190 FPS, a 62% reduction. This large gap indicates that the Ultra preset's additional graphical effects significantly increase GPU load, but even the lowest figure is far above standard monitor refresh rates.

Q: Which rival GPU is closest in performance to the RTX 5080?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE leads the RTX 5080 by 2.2% in average benchmark score (57,367 vs. 56,083). The AMD Radeon 8060S trails by 0.6%, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 0.7% behind, and the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 2.3% slower.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU at any resolution in this game?

A: The data suggests no CPU bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 497 FPS, and the frame rate scales uniformly (~54% reduction) from 1080p to 4K across all settings. This consistent scaling indicates the GPU is the limiting factor, not the Ryzen 5 7400F's 6 cores and 12 threads.