Undisputed

FAQ

Q: What is the best preset to use for this CPU/GPU combo in Undisputed?

A: The data shows the High preset delivers the best balance of visual quality and performance across all resolutions. At 1080p it averages 248 FPS, at 1440p it averages 179 FPS, and at 4K it averages 113 FPS, all of which are well above smooth playability thresholds.

Q: How much of a performance jump is there from Low to Ultra settings?

A: The gap is substantial. At 1080p, Low averages 417 FPS while Ultra averages 160 FPS, a difference of 257 FPS. At 1440p, Low averages 301 FPS versus Ultra's 115 FPS. At 4K, Low averages 191 FPS while Ultra drops to 73 FPS.

Q: Does the RTX 4070 SUPER bottleneck at 4K Ultra in this game?

A: Yes, the 4K Ultra result of 73 FPS average is the only preset/resolution combination that falls below 100 FPS. Benchmark results indicate this is where the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor, as higher settings at 4K demand significantly more from the graphics processor.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400F scores 21,765 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. Its average benchmark score of 32,750 puts it only 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14600T and 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, while sitting 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H.

Q: Is the 12 GB VRAM sufficient for Undisputed at 4K?

A: The data indicates yes. The 4K Medium result averages 137 FPS with a minimum of 117 FPS, and even 4K High maintains 113 FPS. These results suggest the 12 GB GDDR6X memory with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth is not being saturated at these settings.

Q: What is the performance difference between 1080p and 4K at the High preset?

A: At High settings, the average FPS drops from 248 at 1080p to 179 at 1440p, then to 113 at 4K. This represents a 54.4% reduction from 1080p to 4K, indicating the game becomes progressively more GPU-bound as resolution increases.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data clearly favors the High preset as the optimal configuration for this hardware combination in Undisputed. This recommendation holds across all three tested resolutions, with High delivering the most consistent performance headroom above typical display refresh rates.

At 1080p, High settings produce an average of 248 FPS, which is more than sufficient for any high-refresh-rate monitor. The gap to Ultra at 160 FPS is substantial, yet the visual differences between High and Ultra are unlikely to justify that 35.5% performance penalty in a fast-paced sports title where frame timing matters.

For 1440p users, the High preset averages 179 FPS, comfortably above 144 Hz displays. The Medium preset offers 217 FPS for competitive play, but High provides the better visual fidelity without sacrificing the ability to keep frame rates above common high-refresh thresholds.

At 4K, the High preset's 113 FPS average is the strongest recommendation, as it remains above 100 FPS while delivering significantly better image quality than Medium's 137 FPS or Low's 191 FPS. The Ultra preset at 73 FPS average falls below the 75 FPS threshold that many consider the minimum for smooth gameplay, making it unsuitable for consistent competitive play.

The Low preset is only recommended for players targeting maximum frame rates on 240 Hz or higher refresh displays, particularly at 1080p where it reaches 417 FPS. However, the visual compromise is substantial, and the High preset already exceeds 240 FPS at 1440p and 1080p, making Low largely unnecessary outside of extreme refresh-rate scenarios.

Resolution Scaling

The measured performance scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals how Undisputed responds to pixel count increases. At High settings, the transition from 1080p to 1440p reduces average FPS from 248 to 179, a 27.8% drop. Moving from 1440p to 4K further reduces the average to 113 FPS, another 36.9% decline. The total reduction from 1080p to 4K is 54.4%.

This scaling pattern is typical of a game that becomes increasingly GPU-limited at higher resolutions. The RTX 4070 SUPER's 35.48 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 198.0 GPixel/s pixel rate are the primary drivers of these framerate changes. The 192-bit memory bus with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth also plays a role, as higher resolutions demand more memory throughput.

At Low settings, the scaling is even more pronounced in absolute terms. The 1080p result of 417 FPS drops to 301 FPS at 1440p and then to 191 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops are 27.8% and 36.5% respectively, closely mirroring the High preset's scaling. This consistency suggests the game's rendering pipeline has similar resolution scaling behavior across settings.

The Medium preset shows the same pattern with 300 FPS at 1080p, 217 FPS at 1440p, and 137 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset follows with 160 FPS at 1080p, 115 FPS at 1440p, and 73 FPS at 4K. The consistency of these scaling ratios indicates that resolution is the dominant factor in performance variation, with settings amplifying the base performance level rather than changing how the GPU responds to pixel count.

The 4K Ultra result of 73 FPS represents the steepest relative drop from 1080p, falling 54.4%. This suggests that at Ultra settings, the combination of high pixel count and maximum shading complexity pushes the GPU to its limits, making 4K Ultra the only configuration where the RTX 4070 SUPER cannot maintain a comfortable frame rate margin.

Measured FPS Breakdown

1080p Resolution:

The Low preset averages 417 FPS, making it the highest-performing configuration in the entire dataset. Medium produces 300 FPS average with a minimum of 255 FPS and maximum of 345 FPS, indicating stable frame delivery. High averages 248 FPS, maintaining a large performance buffer above typical display refresh rates. Ultra averages 160 FPS, which remains smooth but represents a 36.4% reduction from the High preset.

1440p Resolution:

Low settings average 301 FPS, still well above 240 Hz display capabilities. Medium averages 217 FPS with minimum 184 FPS and maximum 249 FPS, showing tight frame pacing. High averages 179 FPS, comfortably exceeding 144 Hz displays. Ultra averages 115 FPS, which is above common 100 Hz monitors but below 144 Hz thresholds.

4K Resolution:

Low settings average 191 FPS, demonstrating the GPU's capability even at maximum pixel count. Medium averages 137 FPS with minimum 117 FPS and maximum 158 FPS, providing stable performance above 120 Hz. High averages 113 FPS, suitable for 120 Hz displays. Ultra averages 73 FPS, the only result below 100 FPS in the entire dataset, indicating this configuration pushes the hardware too far for smooth competitive play.

The Medium preset is the only one with min/max data across all resolutions, providing insight into frame consistency. At 4K, the range from 117 to 158 FPS around the 137 average indicates moderate frame variance. At 1440p, the range of 184 to 249 around 217 average shows similar variance patterns. At 1080p, the range of 255 to 345 around 300 average maintains proportionally consistent behavior.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus provides 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration proves sufficient for Undisputed's demands, as even the 4K Medium result maintains 137 FPS average with 117 FPS minimum, suggesting no memory capacity or bandwidth bottlenecks at these settings.

The GPU's clock behavior shows a base clock of 1980 MHz and boost clock of 2475 MHz. These clocks, combined with 7168 shading units and 224 texture mapping units, deliver 35.48 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The 80 ROPs achieve a pixel rate of 198.0 GPixel/s, which directly influences how quickly the GPU can fill framebuffers at 4K resolution.

The AD104 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. This architecture, Ada Lovelace, supports DirectX 12 Ultimate with all its modern rendering features. The 56 RT cores and 224 tensor cores are available for games that utilize ray tracing or DLSS, though the measured data in Undisputed does not indicate specific usage of these features.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4627 and Passmark G3D score of 29995 place it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 43223 puts it within 0.1% of the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB and 1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, showing competitive positioning against very different hardware classes.

The 220 W TDP and dual-slot design with a single 16-pin connector indicate this GPU is designed for mainstream desktop integration. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for the game's data transfer needs, as evidenced by the strong performance across all resolution and settings combinations.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F features 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. Its base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 4.70 GHz provide the single-thread performance that sports games like Undisputed typically rely on for game logic and physics calculations.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 scores of 21,765 multi-core and 3,072 single-core demonstrate strong processing capability. The single-core performance is particularly relevant for Undisputed, as the game's core simulation loops generally scale with single-thread performance. The 3,072 single-core score places this CPU well above the threshold needed to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in this title.

The 32 MB shared L3 cache and 1 MB L2 cache per core provide ample on-die storage for game data. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth from dual-channel DDR5 support ensures the CPU can feed data to the GPU without creating a bottleneck, as evidenced by the high frame rates achieved even at lower resolutions where CPU overhead is more likely to surface.

The CPU's Passmark multi-thread score of 25,645 and single-thread score of 3,689 indicate balanced performance across both threaded and lightly-threaded workloads. Its average benchmark score of 32,750 places it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core i5-14600T at 0.1% ahead and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H at 0.2% ahead.

In Undisputed, the CPU's role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions where the GPU has less work per frame. The 1080p Low result of 417 FPS suggests the CPU can drive frame rates well beyond typical display refresh rates, indicating no significant CPU limitation exists. The consistent scaling pattern across resolutions further confirms the CPU maintains adequate performance headroom throughout the GPU's workload range.

The 65 W TDP and 5 nm TSMC process node make this an efficient processor for sustained gaming sessions. Its AMD Socket AM5 platform with PCIe Gen 5 support provides a modern foundation, though the game's performance in the measured data does not appear constrained by platform bandwidth limitations.