Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 combination ranks 1184th out of 2813 tested combos in Undisputed. This places the pairing in the 58th percentile of all tested hardware configurations, meaning it outperforms more than half of the systems measured but sits below the top tier of enthusiast setups. The rank reflects a balanced mid-range pairing where neither component dramatically bottlenecks the other, though the data suggests the RTX 3070 carries more of the performance load than the Ryzen 5 5600F in this boxing title. The 6-core, 12-thread CPU posts a PassMark multithread score of 19236 and a single-thread score of 2872, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU, meanwhile, delivers a PassMark G3D score of 22214 and sits in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. The gap between CPU percentile (85th) and GPU percentile (61st) hints that the graphics card is the more likely constraint when frame rates dip, especially at higher resolutions and quality presets.

How This Combo Ranks

At 1184th of 2813 combos, this system lands squarely in the upper-middle of the database's tested configurations for Undisputed. The ranking implies that roughly 58% of tested systems perform worse, while 42% perform better. The Ryzen 5 5600F's nearest rivals in CPU benchmarks include the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (avg score 36938, delta 0%), the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (avg score 37018, delta -0.2%), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (avg score 37093, delta -0.4%). These tiny deltas — all within half a percent — show the 5600F is tightly clustered with modern mid-range chips, meaning its contribution to the combo rank is consistent with expectations for its class.

The RTX 3070's nearest rivals tell a similar story. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (avg score 17083, delta 0.7%) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (avg score 17037, delta 1%) bracket the 3070's average score of 17208, while the NVIDIA Tesla K40c (avg score 17468, delta -1.5%) sits slightly above. The GPU's 61st percentile ranking lags the CPU's 85th percentile, which is a meaningful divergence. In Undisputed, where the measured FPS ranges from 54 at 4K Ultra to 308 at 1080p Low, the combo rank of 1184 suggests the system can handle the game comfortably at most settings, but the GPU's lower percentile relative to the CPU becomes apparent at the most demanding presets — 4K Ultra drops to 54 FPS average, which is the weakest result in the measured set.

GPU Role

The RTX 3070 brings 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its base clock runs at 1500 MHz with a boost clock of 1725 MHz, and the memory operates at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). These specs position the GPU as a capable 1440p performer, and the measured data supports that: at 2560x1440 High, the combo averages 132 FPS; at 1440p Medium, it hits 160 FPS; at 1440p Low, it reaches 222 FPS. The card's 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output pipelines handle Undisputed's character models and arena environments without apparent strain until the Ultra preset is enabled.

At 4K Ultra, the average FPS collapses to 54, a 61% drop from 4K Low's 141 FPS. This steep decline points to the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth being insufficient for the Ultra preset's texture and shadow workloads at 3840x2160. The 4K Medium result of 101 FPS (with min 86, max 116) shows the card can manage 4K when settings are moderated. The RTX 3070's 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 165.6 GPixel/s pixel rate are respectable, but the data indicates that Undisputed at 4K Ultra demands more than this GPU can deliver for smooth play. The GPU's PassMark DirectX 12 score of 85 and DirectX 11 score of 182 suggest the card's API overhead is modest, which aligns with the relatively strong FPS at lower resolutions where the CPU can feed frames efficiently.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play at with this combo?

A: The measured data shows 2560x1440 High averaging 132 FPS and 1920x1080 High averaging 183 FPS, both well above 60 FPS. At 4K High, the average drops to 84 FPS, which is playable but less comfortable. The sweet spot appears to be 1440p, where High and Medium presets (132 and 160 FPS respectively) provide headroom for consistent frame pacing.

Q: How does the Ultra preset compare to High across resolutions?

A: At 1080p, Ultra averages 118 FPS versus High's 183 FPS, a 35% reduction. At 1440p, Ultra averages 85 FPS versus High's 132 FPS, a 36% drop. At 4K, Ultra averages 54 FPS versus High's 84 FPS, a 36% decrease. The consistent drop across resolutions indicates the Ultra preset imposes a uniform workload increase that scales with pixel count.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 5600F holding back the RTX 3070 in this game?

A: The CPU's 85th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 61st percentile suggests the processor is not the limiting factor. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 308 FPS, which is near the practical ceiling for most displays. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 2872 and multithread score of 19236 are strong enough to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in Undisputed's simulated boxing matches.

Q: What frame rates can I expect at 4K with this setup?

A: The measured data shows 141 FPS at 4K Low, 101 FPS at 4K Medium (min 86, max 116), 84 FPS at 4K High, and 54 FPS at 4K Ultra. The 4K Medium result with a minimum of 86 FPS indicates the GPU can maintain smooth gameplay at 4K if the preset is kept below High.

Q: How does the RTX 3070 compare to its closest rival, the RX 7600 XT?

A: The RTX 3070 has an average benchmark score of 17208, while the RX 7600 XT scores 17083, a delta of 0.7% in favor of the 3070. This near-tie suggests the two GPUs perform similarly in synthetic tests, but the measured FPS in Undisputed reflects the 3070's specific driver and architecture characteristics.

Q: Does the 8 GB VRAM cause problems at any settings?

A: At 4K Ultra, the average FPS of 54 suggests the 8 GB frame buffer is overwhelmed by the Ultra preset's memory demands. At 4K High, the average of 84 FPS indicates the GPU manages with reduced texture quality. The 4K Medium result of 101 FPS (min 86) shows acceptable performance when settings are tuned down to fit within the VRAM limit.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured data covers four resolutions and four settings presets, providing a complete picture of the combo's performance envelope. At 1920x1080, the results are: Low averages 308 FPS, Medium averages 221 FPS (min 188, max 255), High averages 183 FPS, and Ultra averages 118 FPS. The jump from 308 to 221 FPS between Low and Medium is a 28% reduction, while the drop from High to Ultra is 36%. These figures show the CPU and GPU both have ample headroom at 1080p, with even the Ultra preset remaining well above 100 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the averages are: Low at 222 FPS, Medium at 160 FPS (min 136, max 184), High at 132 FPS, and Ultra at 85 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p reduces FPS by approximately 28-33% across presets, which is consistent with the 1.78x pixel increase from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440. The 1440p Ultra result of 85 FPS is notable because it remains playable, unlike the 4K Ultra result. The 1440p Medium minimum of 136 FPS indicates stable frame delivery during intense in-ring action.

At 3840x2160, the averages are: Low at 141 FPS, Medium at 101 FPS (min 86, max 116), High at 84 FPS, and Ultra at 54 FPS. The 4K Low result of 141 FPS is surprisingly strong, suggesting the game's Low preset is not particularly demanding on the GPU's memory bandwidth. However, the 4K Ultra result of 54 FPS is the only measured average below 60, making it the sole configuration where the combo fails to deliver smooth gameplay by conventional standards. The 4K Medium range of 86 to 116 FPS shows the GPU can handle 4K when settings are moderate, but the High preset's 84 FPS average leaves little margin for frame drops.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data suggests the Medium preset at 1440p provides the best balance of visual quality and performance. At 2560x1440 Medium, the combo averages 160 FPS with a minimum of 136 FPS and maximum of 184 FPS. This configuration keeps the frame rate comfortably above 120 FPS, which is beneficial for a sports title where smooth motion is critical for tracking opponent movements. The 1440p Medium result also stays within the GPU's 8 GB VRAM capacity, avoiding the memory pressure that plagues the 4K Ultra preset.

For players with 1080p displays, the High preset at 183 FPS is the recommended choice. It delivers a substantial visual improvement over Medium (221 FPS) while maintaining a frame rate that exceeds most 144Hz monitors' refresh rates. The 1080p Ultra preset at 118 FPS is also viable, but the 35% performance penalty relative to High is hard to justify when the visual gains are marginal in a game focused on two-character interactions. At 4K, the Medium preset at 101 FPS (min 86) is the only truly playable option, as High at 84 FPS lacks headroom and Ultra at 54 FPS falls below the 60 FPS threshold. The data indicates that 4K Medium is the ceiling for this combo in Undisputed if consistent frame delivery is the priority.

CPU Role

The Ryzen 5 5600F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on Zen 3 architecture, manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC. It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. Its PassMark multithread score of 19236 and single-thread score of 2872 place it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, which is remarkably high for a mid-range chip. The nearest rivals — the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (36938 avg), AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (37018 avg), and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (37093 avg) — all score within 0.5% of the 5600F's average benchmark score of 36945, confirming its competitive positioning.

In Undisputed, the CPU's role appears secondary to the GPU, as evidenced by the FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 308 FPS, which is likely near the CPU's frame delivery limit for this game. The fact that 1080p Ultra (118 FPS) is less than half of 1080p Low (308 FPS) suggests the GPU becomes the bottleneck as settings increase, while the CPU maintains consistent frame generation. The 6-core configuration with 12 threads is adequate for Undisputed's physics and AI calculations, which are not particularly demanding given the game's 1v1 boxing format. The CPU's memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s on dual-channel DDR4 is sufficient to feed the GPU at 1080p and 1440p, as the measured FPS at those resolutions remains high.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K reveals where the bottleneck shifts in this combo. At 1080p Low, the average is 308 FPS; at 1440p Low, it drops to 222 FPS (28% reduction); at 4K Low, it falls to 141 FPS (54% reduction from 1080p). This scaling pattern — where the FPS drop is smaller than the pixel count increase (1.78x from 1080p to 1440p, 4x from 1080p to 4K) — indicates the GPU is not fully saturated at lower resolutions. The CPU can deliver frames faster than the GPU can render them at 1080p, but as resolution increases, the GPU's workload grows and the FPS drops accordingly.

For the Ultra preset, the scaling is more severe. From 1080p Ultra (118 FPS) to 1440p Ultra (85 FPS) is a 28% drop, and from 1440p Ultra to 4K Ultra (54 FPS) is a 36% drop. The 4K Ultra result of 54 FPS is the only measured average below 60 FPS, and it aligns with the GPU's 61st percentile ranking. The RTX 3070's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are the likely culprits at 4K Ultra, as the preset's high-resolution textures and effects exceed the GPU's memory capacity. The 4K Medium result of 101 FPS (min 86) versus 4K High at 84 FPS shows a 17% performance gap, which is smaller than the 30-36% gaps seen between Medium and High at lower resolutions. This suggests the GPU's memory subsystem becomes a limiting factor at 4K, and the High preset's additional memory demands cause a disproportionate performance hit. The data overall indicates the combo is CPU-bound at 1080p, balanced at 1440p, and GPU-bound at 4K, with the Ultra preset at 4K being the only configuration where the system struggles to maintain playable frame rates.