Thief
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 105 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 48 | 51 | 64 | 87 |
| 1440p QHD | 79 | 81 | 107 | 143 |
| 1080p Full HD | 116 | 122 | 157 | 210 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Thief with AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 delivers a compelling, if uneven, experience in Thief. The data shows a combination that is heavily constrained by the graphics card at higher resolutions, yet reveals the CPU's immense headroom at lower settings. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, contextualizes the hardware within its respective performance percentiles, and explains where each component's role begins and ends.
FAQ
*Q: What is the overall rank of this CPU and GPU combination in Thief?*
A: The combo ranks 603rd out of 1642 tested combinations, placing it in the top 36.7% of all tested hardware pairings for this title.
Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9800X3D compare to its closest CPU rivals in average benchmark scores?
A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 37780 is effectively tied with the Intel Xeon 6353P (37811, -0.1%) and the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (37831, -0.1%). It sits slightly behind the Intel Core i9-13900HK (38020, -0.6%) and Intel Core i5-13600KF (38028, -0.7%).
Q: What is the RTX 3070's performance standing relative to other GPUs?
A: The GPU holds a percentile ranking of 72 among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 28238 is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (27985, +0.9%) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti (27956, +1.0%), while slightly trailing the AMD FirePro S7150 (28409, -0.6%).
*Q: What is the best-case FPS scenario for this combo in Thief?*
A: The highest average frame rate measured is 209.5 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This indicates the combination can push far beyond standard display refresh rates when the graphical load is minimized.
Q: What is the most demanding scenario for this combo?
A: The lowest average frame rate is 47.9 FPS, recorded at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings. This is the only configuration that dips below the 50.9 FPS average seen at 4K High, showing the significant cost of maxing out visual fidelity at 4K.
*Q: Does the CPU's high single-thread performance prevent FPS drops in Thief?*
A: The CPU's single-thread score in Cinebench R23 is 4800, and its PassMark single-thread score is 4430. While these are strong numbers, the FPS data shows that at 4K Ultra, the frame rate drops to 47.9, indicating that the GPU becomes the limiting factor before CPU single-thread performance is a concern.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination's position at rank 603 out of 1642 combos in Thief suggests a pairing that is stronger than the median but not exceptional. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D is a top-tier processor, with a percentile ranking of 90 against all CPUs, meaning it performs better than 90% of all CPUs tested. Its average benchmark score of 37780 places it in the same league as the Intel Core i5-13600KF, which has a score of 38028 and is only 0.7% faster.
However, the RTX 3070 is a mid-to-high-range graphics card with a percentile of 72 against all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 28238 is statistically indistinguishable from the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (27985, +0.9%). This disparity in relative strength between the CPU and GPU is the defining characteristic of this combo. The CPU is capable of feeding far more powerful graphics cards, but the RTX 3070 cannot always utilize the full potential of the 9800X3D, especially at lower resolutions where the CPU is less of a bottleneck.
The data implies that the 9800X3D is not the limiting factor in most scenarios for Thief. The CPU's benchmark scores, such as a multi-core score of 34004 in Cinebench R23 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 40009, are exceptional. This hardware is in the 90th percentile for a reason. The combo's overall rank of 603 is therefore pulled down by the GPU's relative performance, which, while respectable, falls significantly short of the CPU's capabilities. This is a classic case of a high-end processor being paired with a solid but not flagship graphics card, resulting in a system that is well-balanced for high-refresh-rate 1080p and 1440p gaming but leaves performance on the table at lower resolutions.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 plays the pivotal role of rendering the final image, and its memory configuration and clock speeds are critical to understanding its performance in Thief. The card features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. This memory bandwidth is sufficient to feed the GPU's 5888 shading units, but the 8 GB capacity is the primary concern for high-resolution textures.
The GPU's base clock is 1500 MHz with a boost clock of 1725 MHz. In a game from 2014 like Thief, these clock speeds are more than adequate to drive high frame rates. The bottleneck is not the clock speed but rather the memory capacity and the raw compute power. The card's FP32 performance is rated at 20.31 TFLOPS, which is substantial for the game's era. However, the data shows a clear trend: as resolution increases, the frame rate drops significantly, highlighting the GPU's workload intensifying.
The role of the GPU becomes the deciding factor in performance scaling. At 4K Ultra, the game demands more from the 8 GB VRAM buffer, and the average FPS falls to 47.9. This is not a CPU limitation; it is the GPU struggling to maintain high frame rates with the increased pixel count and texture detail. The RTX 3070's performance, while adequate for 1080p and 1440p, shows its limits at 4K, where it cannot consistently deliver smooth frame rates at the highest settings. The GPU's architecture and memory bus are well-suited for the game, but the finite memory capacity and compute throughput cap its performance at higher resolutions.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at how the combination scales across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the combo is largely CPU-bound, delivering an average of 209.5 FPS at Low, 157.2 FPS at Medium, 121.9 FPS at High, and 116.1 FPS at Ultra. The gap between Low and Ultra is significant, but even the Ultra setting maintains a high average that is well beyond the needs of most monitors.
Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU begins to assert its influence. The average FPS drops to 143.4 at Low, 107.4 at Medium, 80.7 at High, and 78.6 at Ultra. The performance penalty for increasing resolution is clear, but the system still delivers playable frame rates across all settings. The drop from 1080p Low to 1440p Low is 66.1 FPS, a considerable reduction that indicates the GPU is now a more significant factor.
At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint. The average FPS falls to 87.1 at Low, 64.4 at Medium, 50.9 at High, and 47.9 at Ultra. These numbers show that while the game is still playable at 4K Low and Medium, the High and Ultra presets push the RTX 3070 to its limits, with the latter dropping below the 50 FPS threshold. The data shows a clear hierarchy: 1080p is effortless, 1440p is strong, and 4K is only viable with reduced settings.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and reveals the limiting component. At Low settings, the average frame rate falls from 209.5 FPS at 1080p to 143.4 FPS at 1440p, a 31.6% reduction. Moving from 1440p to 4K sees a further drop to 87.1 FPS, a 39.3% reduction from 1440p. The total drop from 1080p Low to 4K Low is 58.4%, a massive decrease that is almost entirely attributable to the GPU's rendering load.
The scaling pattern is similar at Ultra settings, though the absolute numbers are lower. The average FPS goes from 116.1 at 1080p to 78.6 at 1440p (32.3% drop), and then to 47.9 at 4K (39.1% drop from 1440p). The consistency of these percentage drops across different settings presets is a strong indicator that the scaling is primarily a function of pixel count, not texture quality or other settings that might impact the CPU.
This behavior clearly identifies the GPU as the limiting factor. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the FPS would remain relatively flat across resolutions, as the CPU's workload does not change significantly with resolution. Instead, the frame rate scales inversely with resolution, which is the classic signature of a GPU-bound scenario. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D, with its high single-thread score of 4800 in Cinebench R23, is more than capable of handling the game's logic and draw calls at any resolution, but the RTX 3070 simply cannot maintain the same frame rate as the pixel count increases. The data confirms that for this combo in Thief, the graphics card is the definitive bottleneck, and the CPU's performance is mostly held in reserve.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 in Thief
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 87.1 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 64.4 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 50.9 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 47.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 143.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 107.4 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 80.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 78.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 209.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 157.2 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 121.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 116.1 |
Thief with Ryzen 7 9800X3D + Other GPUs
See how Thief performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Thief with RTX 3070 + Other CPUs
See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 9800X3D + RTX 3070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.