Archeage
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 87 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 25 | 41 | 62 | 67 |
| 1440p QHD | 46 | 73 | 105 | 120 |
| 1080p Full HD | 69 | 105 | 156 | 176 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Archeage with AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 pairing in ArcheAge shows a fascinating split personality. At 1080p, this combination delivers exceptional frame rates that suggest a light CPU workload, but the 4K results reveal a hard GPU ceiling that reshapes the entire experience. The data indicates a system that is remarkably consistent in its scaling behavior, though the absolute numbers at each setting tier tell a more complex story about where the true bottleneck resides.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K is dramatic and consistent across all settings, but the magnitude of that drop reveals the limiting component. Moving from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 at High settings, the average FPS falls from 104.9 to 40.5, a reduction of roughly 61%. This is a steep decline that strongly indicates the GPU is the primary constraint at higher resolutions, as the rendering workload scales directly with pixel count.
At Low settings, the scaling is even more pronounced. The 175.8 FPS at 1080p craters to 66.7 FPS at 4K, a 62% drop that shows the RTX 3070 simply cannot maintain high frame rates when the pixel throughput quadruples. The 1440p results sit almost exactly in the middle of these extremes, with Low settings hitting 119.7 FPS and High settings at 72.9 FPS, confirming a linear relationship between resolution and performance that is typical of a GPU-bound scenario.
However, the Ultra settings tell a slightly different story. The 68.5 FPS at 1080p drops to 45.8 FPS at 1440p and then to 25 FPS at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 1440p is 33%, but from 1440p to 4K it is 45%. This increasing rate of decline suggests that at Ultra, the combination of high-quality effects and high resolution starts to exhaust the GPU's memory bandwidth, making the 4K Ultra result a particularly punishing 25 FPS average.
GPU Role
The RTX 3070 brings 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. In ArcheAge, an MMORPG that can feature large player gatherings and complex environments, this memory configuration proves adequate at 1080p but becomes a limiting factor at higher resolutions. The 4K High result of 40.5 FPS versus the 1440p High result of 72.9 FPS illustrates how the GPU's 8 GB capacity and bandwidth are strained when the framebuffer demands increase.
The GPU's clock behavior also plays a role. With a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost of 1725 MHz, the card operates in a narrow frequency window that does not dynamically scale to compensate for resolution increases. The memory clock of 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective, is fixed, meaning the card cannot adapt its memory speed to offset the higher resolution workload. This rigidity explains why the FPS drops are so consistent across settings at each resolution.
The RTX 3070 sits at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 28238. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti, which score 27985 and 27956 respectively, placing the RTX 3070 just 0.9% and 1.0% ahead. This competitive positioning means the GPU is a mid-to-high-tier part, but not a flagship, which aligns with the observed 4K performance that struggles to reach 60 FPS at any setting.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in ArcheAge?
A: The 1440p results provide the best balance, with High settings achieving 72.9 FPS and Low settings at 119.7 FPS. At 1080p, all settings except Ultra exceed 100 FPS, but the higher resolution offers more visual clarity without falling below playable thresholds.
Q: Why is 4K Ultra performance so poor at 25 FPS?
A: The Ultra preset at 3840x2160 demands maximum visual quality, which requires more memory bandwidth and shading power than the RTX 3070 can provide. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for this combination, resulting in a frame rate that is far below the 40.5 FPS achieved at 4K High.
Q: How does the CPU affect 1080p performance?
A: The Ryzen 7 9800X3D's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 3341, ensures the CPU does not bottleneck the GPU at lower resolutions. The 175.8 FPS at 1080p Low demonstrates that the CPU can feed the RTX 3070 effectively, allowing the GPU to be the limiting factor.
Q: Is the RTX 3070 significantly better than its nearest rivals?
A: The difference is marginal. The RTX 3070's average benchmark score of 28238 is just 0.9% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT and 1.0% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti, indicating that these cards offer nearly identical aggregate performance in synthetic tests.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and High settings at 1440p?
A: The difference is substantial. Low settings average 119.7 FPS, while High settings average 72.9 FPS, a reduction of 46.8 FPS or approximately 39%. This suggests that the High preset introduces costly visual effects that significantly impact performance.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 ranks 774th out of 1727 tested combinations in ArcheAge, placing it in the upper-middle tier of the database. This percentile position, roughly the 55th percentile, reflects a pairing that is capable but not exceptional within the broader context of all hardware combinations tested in this game.
The CPU's strong performance metrics do not fully compensate for the GPU's limitations. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D sits at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37780, which is nearly balanced against its nearest rivals. The Intel Xeon 6353P scores 37811, just 0.1% higher, and the Intel Core i5-13600KF scores 38028, 0.7% higher. This CPU is clearly a top-tier part, but the RTX 3070's 72nd percentile ranking drags the combined result down.
The rank of 774 out of 1727 suggests that many other combinations, likely pairing stronger GPUs with similar or lesser CPUs, achieve better performance in ArcheAge. The data implies that the GPU is the weaker link in this pairing, as the CPU has ample headroom to support a more powerful graphics card without becoming the limiting factor.
CPU Role
The Ryzen 7 9800X3D is a formidable processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, running at a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. Its 96 MB of shared L3 cache is particularly beneficial for MMORPGs like ArcheAge, where large datasets and player positions are frequently accessed. This cache capacity likely explains why the CPU does not bottleneck the GPU at any resolution, even at 1080p Low where frame rates reach 175.8 FPS.
The CPU's single-thread performance is exceptional, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4800 and a Geekbench single-core score of 3341. These scores indicate that the processor can handle the game's main thread efficiently, which is critical for maintaining high frame rates in an MMORPG where the game logic and network processing often run on a single thread. The multi-threaded scores are equally impressive, with Cinebench R23 multi-core reaching 34004 and PassMark multi-thread at 40009.
The 9800X3D's 3DMark results show strong scaling from 2 threads (2394) to 8 threads (8252) and 16 threads (10081), indicating that the processor efficiently utilizes its cores. However, the game appears to not heavily stress this CPU, as the frame rate differences between 1080p and 1440p at any given setting are primarily driven by GPU load. The CPU's role is to provide consistent, high-frequency execution without introducing frame time spikes, which the data suggests it does admirably.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the RTX 3070 delivers strong performance across all settings. Low averages 175.8 FPS, Medium 156.1 FPS, and High 104.9 FPS, with Ultra being the outlier at 68.5 FPS. The drop from High to Ultra is 36.4 FPS, or 35%, indicating that the Ultra preset includes effects that disproportionately impact performance.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain playable but show the GPU's strain. Low hits 119.7 FPS, Medium 104.6 FPS, and High 72.9 FPS, with Ultra falling to 45.8 FPS. The gap between Medium and High at 1440p is 31.7 FPS, similar to the 1080p gap between those settings, but the absolute values are lower, confirming the resolution penalty.
At 3840x2160, the results are more challenging. Low averages 66.7 FPS, Medium 61.7 FPS, and High 40.5 FPS, with Ultra dropping to 25 FPS. The difference between Low and Medium at 4K is just 5 FPS, suggesting that the Medium preset's additional effects are comparatively lightweight. However, the jump from Medium to High costs 21.2 FPS, a 34% reduction, and moving to Ultra costs another 15.5 FPS.
Settings Recommendations
For players targeting 1080p, the High preset at 104.9 FPS offers the best visual quality without sacrificing smoothness. The Ultra preset's 68.5 FPS is still playable, but the 35% performance hit over High may not justify the visual gains. Low at 175.8 FPS is excessively fast for most displays, so Medium at 156.1 FPS is a viable alternative if High proves too demanding on the GPU.
At 1440p, High at 72.9 FPS is the recommended choice, as it provides a good balance of visual fidelity and performance. Medium at 104.6 FPS offers a smoother experience but with reduced effects, while Ultra at 45.8 FPS drops below the 60 FPS threshold and should be avoided. Low at 119.7 FPS is smooth but sacrifices too much visual quality for a 1440p display.
For 4K, the options are limited. Low at 66.7 FPS is the only preset that stays above 60 FPS, making it the clear recommendation for competitive play. Medium at 61.7 FPS is also acceptable, but High at 40.5 FPS and Ultra at 25 FPS are not recommended for a playable experience. Players who prioritize visual quality at 4K would need to consider a more powerful GPU, as the RTX 3070 cannot maintain high frame rates at this resolution.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 in Archeage
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 66.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 61.7 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 40.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 25.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 119.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 104.6 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 72.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 45.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 175.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 156.1 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 104.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 68.5 |
Archeage with Ryzen 7 9800X3D + Other GPUs
See how Archeage performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Archeage with RTX 3070 + Other CPUs
See how Archeage performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 9800X3D + RTX 3070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.