Control
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 88 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 44 | 49 | 56 | 81 |
| 1440p QHD | 65 | 78 | 89 | 122 |
| 1080p Full HD | 89 | 104 | 115 | 162 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Control with AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 delivers a distinctly GPU-bound experience in Control, with frame rates scaling predictably as resolution increases. The data shows a clear pattern where the CPU’s substantial headroom is never the limiting factor, allowing the RTX 3070’s performance ceiling to define the outcome across all tested settings. This combination ranks in the 56th percentile of all tested combos in this game, placing it above the median but firmly within the territory of high-refresh 1080p and capable 1440p play.
Resolution Scaling
The transition from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 reveals a steep performance curve that is characteristic of a GPU-limited scenario. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 162.1 FPS, but this drops to 121.6 FPS at 1440p and further to 81.4 FPS at 4K. That represents a 25% reduction from 1080p to 1440p, and another 33% reduction from 1440p to 4K. These proportional declines indicate that the rendering workload, not the processor, is dictating the frame rate.
The scaling pattern holds across all quality presets. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 104.2 FPS at 1080p to 78.4 FPS at 1440p, a 25% drop, and then to 48.7 FPS at 4K, a 38% drop from 1440p. The Ultra preset shows the most severe degradation, starting at 88.6 FPS at 1080p and collapsing to 64.5 FPS at 1440p, then 44.1 FPS at 4K. The consistent 25% penalty between 1080p and 1440p across Low, High, and Ultra settings is a strong indicator that the GPU’s pixel throughput is the bottleneck.
At 4K, the gap between Low and Ultra settings is 37.3 FPS, which is nearly identical to the 38.1 FPS gap observed at 1440p. This suggests that the RTX 3070’s memory bandwidth and shading capacity are being taxed equally regardless of resolution, reinforcing the conclusion that the CPU is not contributing to frame time variance. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D’s 96 MB of shared L3 cache and high boost clock of 5.20 GHz are more than sufficient to feed the GPU, as evidenced by the lack of any anomalous scaling breaks.
FAQ
Q: What is the maximum average frame rate this combo achieves in Control?
A: The highest recorded average is 162.1 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This is the only configuration in the measured data that exceeds 160 FPS, indicating a comfortable margin for competitive play at reduced quality.
Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Control?
A: At 3840x2160, the average frame rates range from 44.1 FPS at Ultra to 81.4 FPS at Low. The Ultra preset dips below 45 FPS, which is generally not smooth, but Low settings provide a playable 81.4 FPS, suggesting 4K is feasible only with significant quality compromises.
Q: How does the Ultra preset compare to High at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, High achieves 78.4 FPS while Ultra drops to 64.5 FPS. The 13.9 FPS difference represents a 17.7% performance penalty for the highest quality settings, which may be acceptable depending on the user’s preference for visual fidelity over frame rate.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this game?
A: The scaling data indicates the GPU is the primary constraint. Frame rates drop proportionally with resolution increases, and the CPU’s benchmark scores place it in the 90th percentile of all processors, with a single-thread score of 4800 in Cinebench R23, which is far beyond the demands of this title.
Q: What is the performance gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the difference between Low (162.1 FPS) and Ultra (88.6 FPS) is 73.5 FPS. This 45% reduction highlights the significant cost of enabling the highest graphical features on the RTX 3070, even at a resolution where the CPU has ample headroom.
Q: How does this combo rank relative to all tested configurations?
A: The combo ranks 719th out of 1636 total combinations, placing it in the upper-middle tier. This position reflects a strong CPU paired with a mid-range GPU, resulting in performance that is above average but not near the top of the chart.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is the definitive performance arbiter in this pairing. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p but becomes a limiting factor at 4K, where the higher memory pressure reduces average frame rates below 50 FPS on High settings. The GPU’s boost clock of 1725 MHz and 5888 shading units deliver a raw FP32 throughput of 20.31 TFLOPS, which is modest by current standards but adequate for a 2019 title.
The VRAM capacity is particularly relevant in Control, a game known for its physics-heavy environments and destructible scenes. At 4K with Ultra settings, the 8 GB frame buffer is likely saturated, as evidenced by the 44.1 FPS average. This is the lowest result in the entire measured dataset, and it aligns with the GPU’s 72nd percentile ranking among all GPUs. The RTX 3070’s 46 RT cores are also present, though the measured FPS data does not isolate ray tracing effects, so their contribution remains implicit in the overall scores.
The GPU’s transistor density of 44.4M per mm² on Samsung’s 8 nm process allows for a high clock speed relative to its power envelope, but the 220 W TDP suggests thermal constraints could affect sustained performance in long sessions. That said, the benchmark results show no anomalous dips, indicating the cooling solution is adequate for the tested workloads. The 1x 12-pin power connector and suggested 550 W PSU are standard for this class, and the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface ensures no bandwidth bottleneck with the Ryzen 7 9800X3D’s Gen 5 support.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers a wide range of performance depending on settings. Low settings produce 162.1 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh monitors, while Medium yields 114.5 FPS and High drops to 104.2 FPS. Ultra is the most demanding, with an average of 88.6 FPS. The 73.5 FPS gap between Low and Ultra is substantial, and even at High, the frame rate comfortably exceeds 100 FPS, making 1080p a strong use case for this hardware.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down uniformly. Low settings achieve 121.6 FPS, which remains high, but Medium falls to 88.6 FPS, High to 78.4 FPS, and Ultra to 64.5 FPS. The 1440p results show that the RTX 3070 can maintain playable frame rates across all presets, with Ultra staying above 60 FPS. This resolution appears to be the sweet spot for balancing visual quality and smoothness.
At 3840x2160, the limitations become apparent. Low settings still manage 81.4 FPS, but Medium drops to 56.3 FPS, High to 48.7 FPS, and Ultra to 44.1 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is the only configuration in the entire dataset that falls below 45 FPS, indicating that the GPU’s memory bandwidth and compute resources are overwhelmed. The pattern across all three resolutions is consistent: each step up in settings costs roughly 10-20 FPS, with the largest absolute penalty occurring at 1080p due to the higher baseline.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 holds the 719th position out of 1636 tested combos in Control. This places it in the 56th percentile, meaning it outperforms more than half of all configurations but lags behind the top-tier setups that pair high-end CPUs with flagship GPUs. The CPU alone ranks in the 90th percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 37780, while the GPU sits in the 72nd percentile with an average score of 28238. This discrepancy explains the overall ranking: the CPU is overqualified for the GPU’s capabilities, but the combo still benefits from the processor’s ability to maintain consistent frame pacing.
The CPU’s nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i9-13900HK and Intel Core i5-13600KF, have average scores within 0.7% of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, yet the measured FPS results in this game are unlikely to differ significantly because the GPU is the bottleneck. Similarly, the RTX 3070’s closest competitors, including the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti, show performance deltas of less than 1.1%, reinforcing that this GPU tier produces comparable results in Control regardless of the partner CPU. The 719th rank reflects a balanced mid-high setup that excels at 1080p and 1440p but cannot compete with 4K-oriented configurations featuring higher VRAM and faster memory subsystems.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 in Control
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 81.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 56.3 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 48.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 44.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 121.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 88.6 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 78.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 64.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 162.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 114.5 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 104.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 88.6 |
Control with Ryzen 7 9800X3D + Other GPUs
See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Control with RTX 3070 + Other CPUs
See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 9800X3D + RTX 3070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.